28 June 2007

2006 Census Results

| Deano
Join the conversation
43

The ABS has started to release the results of the 2006 Census

Interesting facts about the ACT:

324,034 persons usually resident in Australian Capital Territory: 49.3% were males and 50.7% were females. Of the total population in Australian Capital Territory 1.2% were Indigenous persons, compared with 2.3% Indigenous persons in Australia.

19.1% of the population usually resident in Australian Capital Territory were children aged between 0-14 years, and 20.3% were persons aged 55 years and over. The median age of persons in Australian Capital Territory was 34 years, compared with 37 years for persons in Australia.

89.5% of persons usually resident in Australian Capital Territory were Australian citizens, 21.7% were born overseas and 0.9% were overseas visitors.

73.0% of persons usually resident in Australian Capital Territory stated they were born in Australia. Other common responses within Australian Capital Territory were: England 4.0%, New Zealand 1.2%, China 1.1%, India 0.8% and Viet Nam 0.7%.

English was stated as the only language spoken at home by 81.0% of persons usually resident in Australian Capital Territory. The most common languages other than English spoken at home were: Mandarin 1.1%, Italian 1.1%, Vietnamese 0.9%, Cantonese 0.9% and Greek 0.8%.

The most common responses for religious affiliation for persons usually resident in Australian Capital Territory were Catholic 28.0%, No Religion 23.4%, Anglican 16.7%, Uniting Church 4.0% and Presbyterian and Reformed 2.7%.

47.7% of persons aged 15 years and over usually resident in Australian Capital Territory were married, 37.2% never married, 10.9% separated or divorced and 4.1% widowed.

In Australian Capital Territory, the median weekly individual income for persons aged 15 years and over who were usual residents was $722, compared with $466 in Australia. The median weekly household income was $1,509, compared with $1,027 in Australia. The median weekly family income was $1,773, compared with $1,171 in Australia.

There were 84,508 families in Australian Capital Territory: 47.0% were couple families with children, 36.2% were couple families without children, 15.1% were one parent families and 1.6% were other families.

There were 122,901 occupied private dwellings counted in Australian Capital Territory: 75.0% were separate houses, 13.5% were semi-detached, row or terrace house, townhouse etc, 11.3% were flat, unit or apartment and 0.2% were other dwellings.

In Australian Capital Territory, the median weekly rent was $260, compared to $190 in Australia. The median monthly housing loan repayment was $1,500, compared to $1,300 in Australia. The average household size was 2.6 and the average number of persons per bedroom was 1.1.

In Australian Capital Territory, 28.7% of occupied private dwellings were fully owned, 36.9% were being purchased and 28.6% were rented.

In Australian Capital Territory, 67.9% of occupied private dwellings were family households, 22.1% were lone person households and 5.1% were group households.

So in summary, compared to the rest of Australia the average Canberran is more likely to:

be aged 15 to 54 years old
born in Australia
speak only English
be a Catholic or atheist
have a much higher income
have children
live in a separate or semi-detached house
be renting
pay a lot more rent
live in a group house
live in government housing

and less likely to:
be married,
own their own home
be widowed
be an indigenous person

Join the conversation

43
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

My spiritual leader actually told me that gay marriage is OK.

As long as both guys are hot…

Did you look outside its raining men

My spiritual leader actually told me that gay marriage is OK.

As long as both chicks are hot…

No one should need any excuse for demanding equal rights, equal rights should be the default position.

I would doubt that the majority of people would think homosexuality is disguisting.
What a ridiculous assumption.
The only people I know who think that are my grandparents.
Oh, and my grandparents also think that asains are the cause of the worlds problems, and also that children should be seen and not heard. So there really highly intelligent people.

Ralph I suspect JHoward agrees with you.
But if so he should say so, and not hide behind religion.

I don’t think the majority of people agree with you and him however.

ralph recent polling shows you are actually in the minority, not the majority.

How about seepi because the majority of the populous thinks that homosexual behaviour is disgusting?

Social deviance isn’t an excuse for demanding equal rights.

Absent Diane12:52 pm 29 Jun 07

so what is the christian way given that ‘god’ in the OT is such a fcking lunatic. Then in the NT that jesus dude ( there is no proof of his existence other than the dribble sorry bible) says a whole bunch of nice things but then says yeah but despite that you still have to follow the word of the OT.. so do you want to kill or do want you love?? which is it.

And how can anyone have any respect for a religion that changes it’s story everytime public perception over issues changes thereby forcing the hand of religious leaders to make there religion relevant again. Absolute rubbish. Remember blood transfusions wasn’t that evil because it was messing with gods work. I wonder how many xtians would reject that now.

I quite like religious history but the fact is that all religions of the earth have been proven wrong time and time again. We have got it wrong and it is time move on and for everybody to collectively explore existence and it’s meaning with logic.

Now would you say I was crazy if I started rambling on about my god roger the squirrel, his brother the hippo who is actually roger the squirrel and then the fan who creates the wind but because roger the squirrel is everything the fan is actually roger the squirrel and the hippo and the hippo is also the fan.

Personally I don’t want to live in a world where people have there stuck up there arse believing in deep illogic. I am a very patient and tolerant person but the illogic has to end sometime.

I saw JH on tv saying explicitly that Aust. is a largely religious nation, that religion is incompatible with gay marriage, and for that reason he was banning it.

I don’t think it is a logical inconsistency to then decide to fill in ‘none’ religion in my census, so as not to be part of the justification for JH continuing to push conservative values.

That’s what the conservatives say.

I thought the banning of gay marraige was directly related to the apparant majority who held “christian values” and were against it.

toriness – You say you believe in freedom of religion, that you “don’t care if people believe in god – I just don’t want to hear about it” Yet you seem to want to spread your own religion.

Religion does not cause war. All major mainstream religions preach peace. And religion is not the reason for banning gay marriage. It’s conservative morality, which is sometimes confused with Christianity. John Howard is, despite what he says, not a Christian, or at least not acting in a Christian way. (Ditto for Dubya).

Apologies for hijacking the thread.

Sure there is a lot of good done by religious organisations, however I happen to know of one particular organistion that has banned their workers from providing contraceptives or contraceptive advise to their clients.
Good thing that the workers ignore management in these cases –
And for the record – I also work for a religious based organisation (not my own religion though, and also not the org referred to above), and the only time religion ever comes into it is at the AGM when they say prayers (and the majority of staff who are non religious always looked quite humourous while trying to join in)

Also, I am surprised that there are not more numbers of non-religious people reflected in the Census – as the majority of people I know would say that they are non-religious – but I guess that they probably think
“Well, I haven’t been to church in 10 years, I have sex before marriage (Maybe I even use condoms!oh no), but I was baotisted at birth – so I’ll just mark catholic.”

thumper i agree each to their own as a general principle – however there are far too many religious nuts out there forcing their views on others and committing evil acts with their religion being an excuse for evil and inhumane behaviour – i taint all religions with the same brush in this respect. i don’t care if people believe in god – i just don’t want to hear about it – and the fact is a lot people who believe in god or allah or whatever won’t keep their religious-biased and -based opinions to themselves.

LOL Woody Mann Caruso – I see you got the latest Bras and Things catalogue as well 🙂

Woody Mann-Caruso10:27 pm 28 Jun 07

From memory, it wasn’t a multiple choice question – you wrote the name of your religion

It was kinda both. I just bet a bunch of people said “well, I believe in Jeebus, but I’m not a Catholic, not Anglican, not UC, not Presbyterian…I’ll just say ‘no religion’.

it could be argued that this reflects a decline in caring.

Yeah – argued by stupid people. Stupid people who believe in magic sky fairies who watch us all masturbate.

Both toriness and sepi are committing the logical fallacy of if A is a part of B and does something, then B does that thing. I forget what it’s called, but it’s so common in philosophy that it has its own name.

It would be like arguing that because Howard is a prick and Howard is a politician, politicians should be banned.

Hang on…

Because John Howard justifies decisions like banning gay marriage under the excuse that it is incompatible with of most of the population being religious. that is the specific reason why I put no religion this time around.

Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.

because there are far too many evil acts done in the name of religion, that’s why. people can be charitable and do community work without being religious.

AD: “Happy about the increasing number of people with no-religion”

toriness: “an increase from the last census to nearly 1 in 5 having no religion is still heartening”

I support everyone being able to believe in whatever they want. Please explain how it is a positive, either to yourselves individually, or to the nation as a whole, that fewer people are religious?

Considering how much charity and community work is done by religious organisations it could be argued that this reflects a decline in caring.

i wish there was an atheist box as well, i would put a big fat cross in it

From memory, it wasn’t a multiple choice question – you wrote the name of your religion and could have easily written atheist if you so wished, or left it blank which is even easier.

Ingeegoodbee3:59 pm 28 Jun 07

Boarding school …rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Ingeegoodbee … either the very old or the very young … there is also a girls’ boarding school in Deakin.

This would also skew the figures somewhat.

i wish there was an atheist box as well, i would put a big fat cross in it. but still – an increase from the last census to nearly 1 in 5 having no religion is still heartening. nice to know australians are getting smarter, even if it is a gradual process 🙂

Ingeegoodbee3:47 pm 28 Jun 07

GnT, I suspect you’d have to like the, erm “older” ladies if you were heading to Deakin to find some lovin’. Deakin also ranks highly for retired folk, widows, and people living in assisted aged care – I’d bet a buck that’s be related to the apparent high population of ladies.

I would rather Forrest any day compared to the North Shore – less crime, bigger blocks, less pollution, Canberra lifestyle, etc. There’s no competition!

Woody Mann-Caruso2:10 pm 28 Jun 07

I wish there was an ‘atheist’ box. I know ‘no religion’ should be the same thing (as Dawkins once said, or quoted somebody saying, atheism is a religion in the same way that not collecting stamps is a hobby), but I suspect a lot of the people who tick ‘no religion’ are really non-denominational Christians who don’t attend church.

Apparently (and only apparently – having heard it on 106.3) Forrest is the most affluent suburb in Australia.

Err Forrest – yeah folks…

I would rather North Shore any day compared to Forrest.

VYBerlinaV8 now_with_added grunt1:42 pm 28 Jun 07

Just goes to show that the ACT is much richer, and effectively more privileged, than the rest of the country. Maybe we should all stop bitching (except me, because I actually live in NSW and commute in every day…).

Did that sound pompous enough?

Naah you’re ok Darklady – I have a goo dphotographer friend who is pre op transexual – becoming a woman – I am the type of person who looks beyond appearances and sees the real person – anyway… kinda off topic….

A couple of weeks ago I was fossicking around in my possessions and foudn a notebook that I had written in late last century.
Seems I was unhappy with paying $210 for a 3br SLUG in Scullin… Try getting that today… Impossible.

captainwhorebags12:50 pm 28 Jun 07

I can’t remember how the question was set up but the rent may be accounted for by group households with people paying $120 or whatever per person

According to the treasurer when he made his speech (sorry, can’t find a link), if you’re looking for the highest proprotion of single females in the ACT, Deakin is the place to go.

DarkLadyWolfMother11:44 am 28 Jun 07

With regard to the rent, people like me (and I know of at least one other, so maybe there are a lot of us) might skew the results.

I’ve been renting the same place for about 10 years and I’m currently paying $250 a week (the rent hasn’t gone up that much). Three bedroom house in Weston Creek area.

I know another person paying slightly less for a 3 bedroom semi-detached in Wanniassa..

DarkLadyWolfMother11:41 am 28 Jun 07

You’re a bad person, Danman. I like that 😉

I’m a shemale (if you prefer that term). I’m also interested in the various ‘gender states’, and advocacy for recognition of same.

Did that sound pompous enough?

I agree with the rent, find a 2 bedroom that isn’t in a getto for less then $350p/w

$260 – what a load.

😮 meant to be 🙂 :0 looks suggestive – especially when speaking of shemales 🙂

Which would you prefer DarkLadyWolfMother – I am a pretty open minded person :0

Absent Diane11:04 am 28 Jun 07

yup that sounds about right..

Happy about the increasing number of people with no-religion (across all states).. although i suspect a lot of people just answer out of lack of care.. which is ok; because atheist should be the default anyway.

DarkLadyWolfMother10:56 am 28 Jun 07

That’s one of the many options. Or do you mean me personally, Danman?

DarkLadyWolfMother10:36 am 28 Jun 07

I admit I’ll be happy when they stop making ‘gender’ binary and start getting figures to find out how many don’t easily fit into just ‘male’ or ‘female’.

But then, I have an agenda 😉

Median weekly rent of $260 in the ACT. Love to know where you can get it for that in the ACT. Must be offset be alot of public housing.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.