RiotACT

Welcome to The RiotACT

Register Post Story How To Post

The RiotACT is an online forum for news and views in the Canberra and ACT Region.
It's an open and interactive ACT online soapbox - a Riot.
"the last ACT election was a choice basically on a par with choosing your preferred sexually transmitted disease." - Ian, June 2009

Lifestyle

Moratorium placed on Molonglo development

ABC online is reporting that a moratorium has been placed on Molonglo development for the next 20 years to allow comprehensive natural resource studies on vulnerable species living in the valley.

About 9,000 homes are eventually expected to be built there.

Planning Minister Andrew Barr says the moratorium will not have any impact on land supply because the development is not due to start for another 20 years.

It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Dunlop

1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5

Discussion

32 comments for “Moratorium placed on Molonglo development”

  1. #1
    VYBerlinaV8_the_one_they_all_copy (Agitator) 16:37, 14 May 08

    …and we wonder why we have a supply problem! Release the damn land!

  2. #2
    hax (Anarchist) 18:03, 14 May 08

    Yet again another way to make land in the ACT more expensive.

    More than 50% of the ACT governments revenue comes from land/property and related taxes – so it’s fair to assume that this is where the majority of the money for all these studies and everything else is ultimately coming from.
    Just bump up the price some more.

  3. #3
    sepi (Agitator) 19:56, 14 May 08

    I am confused now.

    Is this land that is being released in 20 years the same place where the govt is demolishing a small thriving arboretum that th residents love, and also a small old house that a couple live in, who are being kicked out to make way for the developers? Someone near Weston Creek?

    Or is it somewhere else?

  4. #4
    spoonbill (Rioter) 20:05, 14 May 08

    This is wonderful news, and for once the govt should be congratulated for applying for common sense. The reason for the moratorium is because a number of endangered species live in the area, including the little eagle and brown treecreeper. This development should never have proceeded as far as it has these issues were well known and documented.

  5. #5
    VYBerlinaV8_the_one_they_all_copy (Agitator) 20:40, 14 May 08

    No problemo spoonbill, I see why you think this is important. Be aware, however, that in having this opinion you forgoe the right to ever be cranky about local housing prices, since your attitude is keeping land prices a lot higher than they need to be.

  6. #6
    Bungle (Anarchist) 21:23, 14 May 08

    I seriously doubt that land prices in that valley would be in the affordable bracket anyway which wouldn’t bring down the land prices in Wanniassa or Charnwood – maybe in Red Hill.

  7. #7
    deezagood (Rabble Rouser) 22:38, 14 May 08

    Moratorium is such a morose word ….

  8. #8
    ant (Protagonist) 23:08, 14 May 08

    What the hell is a Brown Treecreeper? That sounds like a bloody snake. If it’s a snake, then they need to napalm the entire area immediately.

  9. #9
    Aubergine (Hooligan) 01:22, 15 May 08

    Read the news article closely. The moratorium is on development in CENTRAL Molonglo, which is indeed not due to start for 15-20 years anyway. SOUTH Molonglo is by far the largest part of the entire new town area, stretching from Cotter Rd up to Coppins Crossing, with 15,000 homes slated. And development of this area is definitely not covered by a moratorium – it will start this year. Already they are drilling test holes for geological sampling just west and south of the RSPCA on the north of Cotter Rd. This is where they will be spending over 10 million (see the budget) on a lake and infrastructure. The first suburb, called Coombs, will begin west of here, right near that old house which they shamefully plan to demolish. Also they will be putting housing in North Weston uphill from the AFP facility, but I believe they are having second thoughts about destoying the arboretum there. A lot of the so-called arboretum consists of dead eucalypts next to the Parkway, but the more exotic trees are doing well and must be preserved.

  10. #10
    astroboy (Newbie) 02:49, 15 May 08

    1920s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Duntroon

    1940s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Fairbairn

    1950s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Narrabundah

    1960s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Woden

    1960s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Belconnen

    1970s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Tuggeranong

    1990s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Gungahlin

    2000s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Forde

    2010s – It will be a sad day when that beautiful valley is dotted with houses like another Molonglo and North Weston

  11. #11
    Thumper (Demagogue) 08:25, 15 May 08

    Except astro, all those places mentioned were god forsaken windswept limestone plains ;)

    The Coppins crossing part will be built on as soon as they get around to it as the rural leasees on that land have already had their 999 years leases cut back to 99 years, and then to one year.

    Maybe we need to buy some land off NSW, say, North of Gungahlin, or whatever is out there now.

  12. #12
    Crikey (Picketer) 11:05, 15 May 08

    The stupid fu*king little eagles and brown treecreepers can find somewhere else to live once the bulldozers arrive.

    Where are people going to live now. A 20 year wait – what tools.

  13. #13
    RuffnReady (Picketer) 14:32, 15 May 08

    Crikey, you are the tool. Know anything about ecology? Eliminate species and you break down food webs which in turn destroys entire ecosystems. Guess what? No ecosystem, no humanity. But no, let’s just develop without considering the consequences because what the world definitely needs is more McMansions!

  14. #14
    Crikey (Picketer) 15:51, 15 May 08

    No, what the world needs is more housing for people.

    I am sure RuffnReady has a nice house and enjoys the benefits of city life – but everyone else can line up behind the little eagles and brown treecreepers.

  15. #15
    Mælinar (Veteran Rioter) 16:12, 15 May 08

    To be frank, the Molongolo valley is a wasteland, as the cocky on the land isn’t looking after it.

    I presume this is in response to the lease arrangements, but he wasn’t doing that great a job (barely managing) before the lease changed.

    I see there are 2 things that need to occur before any development begins:

    1. Coppins Crossing becomes 2 lane all the way, and the bridge is fixed up
    2. Water sufficiency measures are implemented and the valley partially filled – this will also add to the ultimate aesthetic and value.

    There is no water, no sewage, no telephones, no power, or any other infrastructure other than a high pressure gas line already in the area – these should also be constructed before any development begins.

    Oh, and if we get another fire event, its probably going to be a very hot suburb.

    What I’d like to see is the cocky put some effort into the property, plant a shedload of trees etc, to raise the natural heritage value of the place. It’ll certainly make it a LOT harder for the ACT Government to wrestle it off him, if it actually had farming value.

  16. #16
    mouthface (Rioter) 16:42, 15 May 08

    Reptile loving green blooded freaks!!!
    Save for a few lofty green hills, all land within the general area identified as “Canberra” should be open to development. Enough of this green-left anti-development nonsense. On the one hand, you lot amuse yourselves with quirky comments on Canberra’s boring tag, and on the other you put up an argument opposing every new development. This town NEEDS TO GROW!!!

    (If you want to accuse me of generalising, that’s fine, I’m new so you are ALL implicated – as I learn your personalities I will be less critical of riot-ACT bloggers in general and save my criticism for those who deserve it)

  17. #17
    Gungahlin Al (Veteran Rioter) 16:51, 15 May 08

    That’s a kind of different way for a newbie to dive on into pond riotact.
    Mouthface, around here the rule is all the regulars dump crap on the newbies but then gradually get to appreciate your point of view (or not).
    Dunno about this idea of flaming any and everybody with your first post. Don’t think that’s the RA way…

  18. #18
    mouthface (Rioter) 16:51, 15 May 08

    RuffnReady said :

    Know anything about ecology? Eliminate species and you break down food webs which in turn destroys entire ecosystems. Guess what? No ecosystem, no humanity. But no, let’s just develop without considering the consequences because what the world definitely needs is more McMansions!

    You are truly a tool! Is it possible to come up with an original thought or are you just mindlessly repeating some claptrap someone once told you to say in order to appear appropriately correct enough to score a BJ at Uni?

  19. #19
    mouthface (Rioter) 16:54, 15 May 08

    Hi Gungahlin Al…
    You may well be right… but I’m starting off as a heel (WWE terminlogy) in order to get some attention and then I may turn good guy (just building my brand)

  20. #20
    Skidbladnir (Agitator) 16:58, 15 May 08

    Gungahlin Al said :

    That’s a kind of different way for a newbie to dive on into pond riotact.
    Mouthface, around here the rule is all the regulars dump crap on the newbies but then gradually get to appreciate your point of view (or not).
    Dunno about this idea of flaming any and everybody with your first post. Don’t think that’s the RA way…

    I liked it, but its a pity about the second posting.
    The dream of a firecracker newbie has become a moist fart of delirium.

  21. #21
    Gungahlin Al (Veteran Rioter) 17:03, 15 May 08

    Ant: brown treecreeper is a little bird. Part of the various little non-descript sensitive woodland birds our ecologist used to call LBJs – little brown jobs.
    The hop up and down trees eating little bugs. They help repel dieback of eucalypts caused by sap-sucking insects called physllids or lerps.

    Problem is that rampant growth of numbers of the very aggressively territorial Noisy Miner leads to LBJs being driven out of large areas, leaving the trees without their natural protectors.

    Presence of the LBJs indicates more healthy ecosystem with mid-storey structure (and therefore less Miners) and hence something worth protection.

    Some very good work done here by David Freudenberger in CSIRO on such “focal species”.

    Sorry, I’ll shuddup now…

  22. #22
    Skidbladnir (Agitator) 17:09, 15 May 08

    Gungahlin Al said :

    Sorry, I’ll shuddup now…

    I generally don’t mind your involvement here Al, except for the occasional moment when you’re trying to divert my taxpayer funds or Government attention to this hastily-cobbled-together project you call “Gungahlin”.

  23. #23
    Gungahlin Al (Veteran Rioter) 17:28, 15 May 08

    Cheers Skid. Just doing what I was elected to do.

    “The dream of a firecracker newbie has become a moist fart of delirium”
    LOL

  24. #24
    caf (Agitator) 17:49, 15 May 08

    Watching the Gungahlin representatives clamour for roads / schools / pools / offices / etc is kind of like watching a turtle on it’s back struggling to right itself. You feel like you should help, but it’s too fascinating just watching…

  25. #25
    spoonbill (Rioter) 21:15, 15 May 08

    VYBerlinaV8. I take your point but that does not make this development, or houses for the people at any cost it, right. This country has a shameful history of extinction and especially in this modern era we have no right to do drive any species to extinction. Mouthface, if that makes me a green blooded freak I will wear the badge with pride – just why does this town need to grow? Like many people I like Canberra as it is. If I wanted to live in a metropolis, I could have chosen Sydney. But I didn’t. As for you the enlightened comments by crikey, I hope it was in gest.

  26. #26
    ant (Protagonist) 22:25, 15 May 08

    Gungahlin Al said :

    Ant: brown treecreeper is a little bird.

    so, not a snake. You’re sure? I wonder if I have any brown treecreeper birds, I’ve been furiously planting trees for years and I knew they were getting to useful size when a sugar glider appeared on my sliding door one night. There’s lots of weird little birds but the bird book isn’t much use at working out what htey are. Or maybe the kookaburras et them.

  27. #27
    Thumper (Demagogue) 08:06, 16 May 08

    Snakes are cool…

    Save the snakes baby…

  28. #28
    Thumper (Demagogue) 08:11, 16 May 08

    Mael,

    the guy on the land at coppins has been on one year leases for yonks. He has had no reason to replant or put in vegetation corridors or whatever as he has known for many, many years that the government will be kicking him off at some time in the future.

    Why put in tens of thousands of dollars of rehab work when it will ultimately get bulldozed for a suburb?

    And you know exactly how expensive rehabilitation/ revegetation works are.

  29. #29
    Thumper (Demagogue) 08:11, 16 May 08

    Watching the Gungahlin representatives clamour for roads / schools / pools / offices / etc is kind of like watching a turtle on it’s back struggling to right itself. You feel like you should help, but it’s too fascinating just watching

    That is one of the funniest things I have ever read on RA.

  30. #30
    Mælinar (Veteran Rioter) 09:35, 16 May 08

    Thumper said :

    Mael,

    the guy on the land at coppins has been on one year leases for yonks. He has had no reason to replant or put in vegetation corridors or whatever as he has known for many, many years that the government will be kicking him off at some time in the future.

    Why put in tens of thousands of dollars of rehab work when it will ultimately get bulldozed for a suburb?

    And you know exactly how expensive rehabilitation/ revegetation works are.

    You don’t see any problem with noting that he has been there for yonks, yet hasn’t done anything to remediate his land ?

    We’re back to our old conversations – have you thought, even for a micron, about lowering the amount of stock you have rather than putting your hand out to the Gumnut for money ?

    Have you thought, that by allowing your stock to eat not only the tertiary layer of the groundcover, but the rootbase as well, that you have increased the rehabilitation time for that paddock by decades, rather than months ?

    I agree, he has no reason now to replant, because it is expensive. What I have said previously though, was that he should have been doing it a long time ago. If he were to make the investment now, there is still a high chance that he could be kicked off the land, however it would be a darned sight better than leaving it to wasteland like it is now.

  31. #31
    Gungahlin Al (Veteran Rioter) 10:26, 16 May 08

    I laughed too Thumper.
    And then I noticed “roads / schools / pools / offices / etc”
    Meaning the message is getting through – Caf knows exactly the things we’ve been pursuing. And that’s half the battle. :)

  32. #32
    Thumper (Demagogue) 10:34, 16 May 08

    Gungahlin could have been interchanged with any other organisation and it still would have been funny ;)


Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Advertisement

Advertisement

Join our Mailing List

Most Commented Posts

Recent Comments

Show your support by making a Donation