Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Canberra kangaroo cull makes the NY Times

By Dave_K - 15 March 2008 15

Somehow the New York Times manages to take a time out on the Elliot Spitzer saga and finds room to run a story about the Belconnen kangaroo cull. Reporter Tim Johnson goes to a bit of effort to implicate federal environment minister Peter Garrett in the issue.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
15 Responses to
Canberra kangaroo cull makes the NY Times
1
AussieGal83 5:17 pm
15 Mar 08
#

Pfft, I love how the articles starts of with “Sydney, Australia”. F*kin stupid yanks.

Report this comment

2
Hasdrubahl 5:42 pm
15 Mar 08
#

If he filed from Sydney, then that’s fair enough.

Vaguely on topic: I bought a pair of shoes today.

Turns out they were made of….

kangaroo leather. Oops.

Report this comment

3
ant 5:51 pm
15 Mar 08
#

4
CanberraResident 7:00 pm
15 Mar 08
#

Does anyone know if the local Aboriginal people were consulted regarding the kangaroo cull? After all, kangaroos are sacred to the indigenous community …

See ABC news: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/15/2190355.htm

PS Couldn’t find the CODE button to insert a hyperlink as per the posting instructions above- sorry.

Report this comment

5
GuruJ 11:16 am
16 Mar 08
#

One fact in the article that I haven’t seen anywhere in the Australian media anywhere is this:

“Last year, state governments issued permits to cull 3.7 million kangaroos…”

Admittedly, they go on to say that only about 2/3 of these are actually shot, but that’s still 2+ million kangaroos killed each year. And we’re getting upset about just 400???

Report this comment

6
Mr Evil 12:37 pm
16 Mar 08
#

Aren’t Kangroos native to Austria?

Report this comment

7
Deadmandrinking 1:13 pm
16 Mar 08
#

Guru, that’s true. I do agree with culling at some levels, but I think 400 of the same mob of kangaroos being culled simply because they’re on the wrong slab of land is excessive and not necessary.

Report this comment

8
sepi 3:55 pm
16 Mar 08
#

Yes Kangaroos are native to Australia, but so what?

We object when african nations kill their endangered species.

I’m not fussed about the kangaroo cull, but the arguments need to be well made (eg – too many kangaroos, no other solutions). Not just ‘it’s our country back off.’

Report this comment

9
Vic Bitterman 6:51 pm
16 Mar 08
#

Whoosh….. over sepi’s head…. as usual….

Report this comment

10
el ......Turbo V8 Re 7:02 pm
16 Mar 08
#

I’m fairly certain that kangaroos aren’t in any way an endangered species, sepi.

Feel free to continually disregard the ‘they’re bloody well starving to death due to overpopulation’ argument, too.

Report this comment

11
Absent Diane 7:31 pm
16 Mar 08
#

can we do a people cull while we are at it? we could start with all the types of people i don’t like. which would mean there would only be me left. Me and the kangaroos, we could be so happy together. We could be soooo cute!!

Report this comment

12
sepi 8:05 pm
16 Mar 08
#

Did I say they were endangered?

I was saying that relying on nationalistic arguments like ‘it’s our country we know what to do with our animals’ is stupid. This is what is bringing in international protesters.

I don’t care about the cull either way.

Report this comment

13
el ......Turbo V8 Re 8:27 pm
16 Mar 08
#

Implied, sepi. Either that or a massive shifting of goalposts.

el ……Turbo V8 Recumbent Bicycle said :

We object when african nations kill their endangered species.

Report this comment

14
Thumper 8:19 am
17 Mar 08
#

So, when is the cull supposed to happen?

If indeed, it does happen now…

Report this comment

15
Mr Evil 1:07 pm
17 Mar 08
#

A-U-S-T-R-I-A!

Pay attention, Sepi: I was having a go at some Americans lack of knowledge of the world outside of the US or A! :)

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site