Skip to content Skip to main navigation

CCC being a little disingenuous?

By johnboy - 3 May 2007 54

A reader has sent in the above image of the Canberra Cycling Club photo page (full size and many more images are also available) from the weekend race which lead to the horrible accident on the Cotter Road.

The screenshot is particularly telling because, if you were to visit the above link now, you wouldn’t be able to find the pictures of the cyclists on the wrong side of the road any more.

This might be related to the Club’s media statement which made the following claim:

The Canberra Tour was conducted in accordance with road rules and approvals from the ACT Department of Territory and Municipal Services, and the immediate response was consistent with the incident plan for the event.

So how many riders were disqualified over the course of the event?

Seeing as we’re assured by cycle racing devotees the rules require this.

UPDATED: Without much pleasure (poking sticks at the Canberra Cycling Club isn’t a goal of mine) I’d be remiss if I didn’t pass along an observation. Another reader has noted that in a great many of the photos there appear to be support vehicles in the background on the wrong side of unbroken lines. This closeup illustrates the point:

Not exactly “conducted in accordance with road rules” then?

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
54 Responses to
CCC being a little disingenuous?
1
RandomGit 2:34 pm
03 May 07
#

Can you say ‘Lobby Group’

Report this comment

2
johnboy 2:52 pm
03 May 07
#

Sorry RG, not quite taking your meaning?

Report this comment

3
Steve666 3:51 pm
03 May 07
#

Oh, the ironing, the ironing, the huge manatee!

Report this comment

4
Sammy 3:57 pm
03 May 07
#

Heads should definitely roll.

Report this comment

5
CraigFromCurtin 4:01 pm
03 May 07
#

Someone should make a complaint to the AFP investigation that these photos prove that the riders were not complying with the road rules, and that the organisers have now removed such photos, probably in an attempt to cover up the truth and, dare I say, pervert the course of justice? Well what do you call it when you hide evidence?

Report this comment

6
Sammy 4:03 pm
03 May 07
#

And think of the poor car driver, who through the poor management of this event is now in the position of being unintentionally involved in this horrendous accident.

Report this comment

7
futto 4:09 pm
03 May 07
#

Nice bit of work discovering that. This is why i enjoy coming to this website so much.

Report this comment

8
Ari 4:43 pm
03 May 07
#

Where are all the rabid cyclists defending this behaviour?

Report this comment

9
Bartron 6:50 pm
03 May 07
#

Ari, I can only assume they are out covering their tracks.

Report this comment

10
Aeek 7:24 pm
03 May 07
#

if you want inexcusable behaviour

“— opening doors into the bunch while stopped in the other lane
— opening doors into a bunch while passing the bunch at speed
— pulling in front of small rider groups after passing, then slamming on the brakes
— pulling alongside a bunch and slowly veering left
— throwing fairly large objects (e.g., big McDonald’s bag full of rubbish, full can of soda) at cyclists”

excerpt from
Comment by advocate — 2 May, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
http://the-riotact.com/?p=4783

Report this comment

11
Ari 8:16 pm
03 May 07
#

Yep, that’s a great defence.

I stand corrected.

Report this comment

12
Bartron 8:22 pm
03 May 07
#

Aeek, That makes disobeying the road rules and then claiming to operate “within the law” OK then?

Explain the cyclists behaviour, not that of a few idiot drivers (throwing stuff, veering and purposly slamming on brakes is not on, no matter what vehicle you travel in/on).

From the looks of them images it’s hardly one or two ‘bad apples’ doing the wrong thing….more like half the pack (and their support vehicles). You want respect on the road, show some respect for other road users and stay on the left….act as if you own the road an other road users will get the shits with you.

Report this comment

13
Aeek 8:32 pm
03 May 07
#

It gives a context for the support vehicles.
I’m not defending the riders crossing the centre line.

Its stay as left as practical, completely different.

Report this comment

14
Ari 8:54 pm
03 May 07
#

Simply, it’s cyclists as hypocrites.

Perfect example.

Report this comment

15
terubo 9:29 pm
03 May 07
#

Pedalling prats.

Report this comment

1 2 3 4

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site