Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Politics

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Cost of living exploding?

By johnboy - 27 October 2011 32

The Liberals’ Zed Seselja (aka the Working Class Hero) is banging his cost of living drum thanks to the latest ABS stats.

Australian Bureau of Statistics data released yesterday shows Canberra’s cost of living is continuing to rise under ACT Labor. In the past year, the ACT has experienced increases in the price indexes of rents (5.8 per cent), utilities (6.9 per cent), electricity (5.3 per cent) and water and sewerage (12 per cent). The ACT is also equal to Sydney with a consumer price index of 3.7 per cent.

“Under ACT Labor, Canberrans are being taxed more than ever before and are faced with such high basic living costs that many struggle to pay their bills,” ACT Opposition Leader, Zed Seselja said today.

“But instead of moving to reduce these pressures, this government continues to punish taxpayers by pushing ahead with a $430 million office block.

We might have to stop calling that office block “the pleasure dome” and start referring to it as “the root of all evil”.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
32 Responses to
Cost of living exploding?
1
Chaz 11:18 am
27 Oct 11
#

why is Zed so unhappy? He’s making $200,000+ per year

Report this comment

2
arescarti42 11:20 am
27 Oct 11
#

“We might have to stop calling that office block “the pleasure dome” and start referring to it as “the root of all evil”.”

Weren’t you referring to it as the “Death Star” at some point? Seems fairly appropriate.

Report this comment

3
qbngeek 11:28 am
27 Oct 11
#

JB, they would be the ABS stats, not the ABC stats.

Report this comment

4
Classified 11:29 am
27 Oct 11
#

Why are they even building the new pleasure dome? Sure, it’s nice to have a new building and all, but that’s a lot of coin.

Report this comment

5
johnboy 11:30 am
27 Oct 11
#

6
Jim Jones 11:50 am
27 Oct 11
#

Classified said :

Why are they even building the new pleasure dome? Sure, it’s nice to have a new building and all, but that’s a lot of coin.

I think (correct me if I’m wrong) because it’s infrastructure that has a large initial outlay, but offsets against future costs. It was recommended by the Hawke review of the ACT public service as part of a way to make the ACT public service more efficient and accountable.

Report this comment

7
housebound 12:03 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Jim Jones said :

I think (correct me if I’m wrong) because it’s infrastructure that has a large initial outlay, but offsets against future costs. It was recommended by the Hawke review of the ACT public service as part of a way to make the ACT public service more efficient and accountable.

I think that’s what the Costello Review was meant to do – shared services, centralise departments to be closer to Civic, and much more – and look where that got us.

Report this comment

8
marcothepolopony 12:04 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Do you think it is the government’s way of deterring and eliminating ‘lower forms of life’ from our community?

Keeping the cost of living sky high will (assist in) keeping out ‘ferals’ and undesirables.

Just a thought…………

Report this comment

9
BethiePrice 12:37 pm
27 Oct 11
#

marcothepolopony said :

Do you think it is the government’s way of deterring and eliminating ‘lower forms of life’ from our community?

Keeping the cost of living sky high will (assist in) keeping out ‘ferals’ and undesirables.

Just a thought…………

Not really, some people take drastic measures when the cost of living becomes to high, thus resorting to ‘undesirable’ status. That bum on the street may have once been a middle income earning home owner forced out of his/her house due to increasing pressures on finances, now they have to beg for food to feed their children.
Plus the price of housing is continuously going up but you don’t see all the government housing on Northbourne being pulled down.
And it’s not just ACT, NSW cost of living isn’t improving either.

Report this comment

10
Deref 12:56 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Of course it’d be soooo much better under the Libs.

Report this comment

11
Deref 12:57 pm
27 Oct 11
#

marcothepolopony said :

Do you think it is the government’s way of deterring and eliminating ‘lower forms of life’ from our community?

Keeping the cost of living sky high will (assist in) keeping out ‘ferals’ and undesirables.

Just a thought…………

If so, it’s not working.

Report this comment

12
Classified 1:06 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Jim Jones said :

Classified said :

Why are they even building the new pleasure dome? Sure, it’s nice to have a new building and all, but that’s a lot of coin.

I think (correct me if I’m wrong) because it’s infrastructure that has a large initial outlay, but offsets against future costs. It was recommended by the Hawke review of the ACT public service as part of a way to make the ACT public service more efficient and accountable.

Clearly someone must have run the numbers, but I’d have thought the interest cost of the money to build would be a large ongoing cost until the loan was eventually paid back. The opportunity cost would be huge, even though down the track (probably in 20-30 years) the ACT govt would own a sizable asset.

Report this comment

13
Classified 1:07 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Deref said :

Of course it’d be soooo much better under the Libs.

It is said that people get the government they deserve.

Report this comment

14
Kiron2222 1:09 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Canberra is the 15th most expensive in the world to live in.

How much more expensive can a glorified country town get?

Report this comment

15
Jim Jones 1:35 pm
27 Oct 11
#

Classified said :

Deref said :

Of course it’d be soooo much better under the Libs.

It is said that people get the government they deserve.

Africans must be really terrible people.

Report this comment

1 2 3

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site