Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

David Eastman’s murder conviction quashed

By Canfan - 22 August 2014 21

David Eastman is set to be released from prison after his murder conviction was quashed in the supreme court today.

The Director of Public Prosecutions must now decide whether Eastman will be hauled back before a jury for another trial.

Holding an effective retrial could prove near impossible as witnesses are now dead, evidence has been destroyed and a jury free from prejudice would be difficult to find.

Eastman, who has spent more than 19 years behind bars, was not in court for today’s ruling.

Should David Eastman face a retrial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
21 Responses to
David Eastman’s murder conviction quashed
1
Canfan 3:39 pm
22 Aug 14
#

2
bundah 3:51 pm
22 Aug 14
#

So even though Acting Justice Martin said he was almost certain of Eastman’s guilt he gets a get out of jail free card due to poor forensics. The ACT is a laughing stock!

Report this comment

3
astrojax 3:54 pm
22 Aug 14
#

Holding an effective retrial could prove near impossible as witnesses are now dead, evidence has been destroyed and a jury free from prejudice would be difficult to find.

probably true, but nonetheless, the dpp surely couldn’t not order a retrial. i wonder if he’ll move back into his public housing residence..?

Report this comment

4
Masquara 4:32 pm
22 Aug 14
#

Simon Corbell, so vocal in his intrusions into this process, appears to have gone to ground.

Report this comment

5
RadioVK 4:40 pm
22 Aug 14
#

astrojax said :

Holding an effective retrial could prove near impossible as witnesses are now dead, evidence has been destroyed and a jury free from prejudice would be difficult to find.

probably true, but nonetheless, the dpp surely couldn’t not order a retrial. i wonder if he’ll move back into his public housing residence..?

If David Eastman was to face a new trial, and if he were to be found guilty, I’d imagine that there’s every chance that he would be sentenced to “time served”, given that he’s been in jail for 19 years already.

That assumes that a fair trial could be had in the first place, which I doubt.

I can’t help feeling that a re-trial would be a waste of time, money, and resources.

Report this comment

6
John Moulis 4:59 pm
22 Aug 14
#

I wonder if In Wollongong Tonight (formerly WIN News) will have the story or if that old bloke’s head will keep popping up all afternoon saying that “we are awaiting a verdict”. What’s that you say? You didn’t know WIN News was still on? A lot of people are saying that nowadays.

Report this comment

7
ChristyJ 5:00 pm
22 Aug 14
#

David Eastman is very fortunate that he had Adelaide Barrister Mark Griffin QC as his lawyer through legal aid during the Eastman Inquiry. What a wonderful day for the Australian Criminal Justice System.

Report this comment

8
astrojax 5:13 pm
22 Aug 14
#

RadioVK said :

astrojax said :

I can’t help feeling that a re-trial would be a waste of time, money, and resources.

so, a re-trial then, given this is canberra…

Report this comment

9
justin heywood 5:36 pm
22 Aug 14
#

I’m no lawyer, but the court seems to favour a retrial @ 298 and 299

Report this comment

10
Masquara 6:58 pm
22 Aug 14
#

Let’s not forget Jon Stanhope welcoming bad news for Eastman at every turn:

http://info.cmcd.act.gov.au/archived-media-releases/media5bd1.html?v=3777&s=326

John Hargreaves, what was your take at the time?

Report this comment

11
Smithers 7:12 pm
22 Aug 14
#

bundah said :

So even though Acting Justice Martin said he was almost certain of Eastman’s guilt he gets a get out of jail free card due to poor forensics. The ACT is a laughing stock!

Yes of course he does. He was wrongfully convicted.

Report this comment

12
dungfungus 8:36 am
23 Aug 14
#

RadioVK said :

astrojax said :

Holding an effective retrial could prove near impossible as witnesses are now dead, evidence has been destroyed and a jury free from prejudice would be difficult to find.

probably true, but nonetheless, the dpp surely couldn’t not order a retrial. i wonder if he’ll move back into his public housing residence..?

If David Eastman was to face a new trial, and if he were to be found guilty, I’d imagine that there’s every chance that he would be sentenced to “time served”, given that he’s been in jail for 19 years already.

That assumes that a fair trial could be had in the first place, which I doubt.

I can’t help feeling that a re-trial would be a waste of time, money, and resources.

Having what you suggested (re-trial, found guilty and sentence commuted to time served) would save the ACT ratepayers millions as Eastman would not be able to claim compensation for wrongful imprisonment.
On the other hand, if he wasn’t found guilty the ACT would be liable for probably twice the amount he should be given now.
Whatever the decision, we can guarantee the ACT government will chose the wrong one.

Report this comment

13
astrojax 8:41 am
23 Aug 14
#

Smithers said :

bundah said :

So even though Acting Justice Martin said he was almost certain of Eastman’s guilt he gets a get out of jail free card due to poor forensics. The ACT is a laughing stock!

Yes of course he does. He was wrongfully convicted.

exactly; ‘wrongfully convicted’ doesn’t mean ‘innocent’, so he should be re-tried so justice can be seen to be done.

Report this comment

14
Antagonist 9:27 am
23 Aug 14
#

This has been a screw-up of monumental proportions from the outset. It has cost the ACT taxpayer enormous amounts in terms of both costs and resources. No matter what direction it takes from here, it will cost the ACT taxpayer a whole bunch more. There are only a few things that seem to be certain in all of this:

1. The DPP had its chance to put Eastman away and they dropped the ball, and has since cost the ACT taxpayer squillions in courts, lawyers, prison resources etc.
2. Eastman was indeed screwed by the process, and regardless of innocence or guilt, has spent 19 years behind bars.
3. The Eastman family would, understandably, be feeling very upset at the moment. I would hate to be in their position.

IMHO, don’t think this could, in fairness, be put to trial again. And if it does, and he is found guilty, it will go to the high court a dozen or so times costing the ACT taxpayer a fortune. It raises an interesting ethical question: Do we cut our costs now and let Eastman walk away with a few million dollars in settlements, or try to put him away costing us a shed-load for years to come?

Report this comment

15
portal0001@lycos.com 3:00 pm
23 Aug 14
#

If Eastman was fitted up in the previous trials, why would having another trial allow justice to be seen to be done? This would be like trying Lindy Chamberlain again.

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site