Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Politics

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Deckchairs rearranged on the Titanic

By PantsMan - 12 December 2011 25

What are the ins and outs of the moves?

[ED – The Prime Minister’s reshuffle has been announced. We’d value reader insights as to what it means for the public service here in Canberra.]

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
25 Responses to
Deckchairs rearranged on the Titanic
1
Primal 3:12 pm
12 Dec 11
#

It means there is now a department known as DIISRTE. Which I shall henceforth be pronouncing as “dessert”.

Report this comment

2
MrMagoo 3:35 pm
12 Dec 11
#

My question is with the shuffling of the deck chairs and creating of new Departments, where is the 4% dividend being saved from???? Toilet paper allowance?

Report this comment

3
MrMagoo 3:37 pm
12 Dec 11
#

I work in the sport portfolio and since 07, we’ve now been MoG’d 3 times, talk about your … wait for it…. Political Football.

Report this comment

4
random 3:57 pm
12 Dec 11
#

Primal said :

It means there is now a department known as DIISRTE. Which I shall henceforth be pronouncing as “dessert”.

The dyslexic reading of “DISTRESS” is probably closer to the mark.

Report this comment

5
chewy14 4:02 pm
12 Dec 11
#

Primal said :

It means there is now a department known as DIISRTE. Which I shall henceforth be pronouncing as “dessert”.

It looks like they’re trying to get dis rite.

Report this comment

6
longshanks 4:31 pm
12 Dec 11
#

MrMagoo said :

My question is with the shuffling of the deck chairs and creating of new Departments, where is the 4% dividend being saved from???? Toilet paper allowance?

I don’t think people realise just how much money departments spend on their Ministers, and MoG changes result in a huge amount of wastage and duplication of effort. I worked through two MoG changes in a large agency, in a role where I was involved in purchasing, e.g. Blackberrys for Minister and advisers; newspaper deliveries (home and office) for Minister and advisers; beautifully embossed letterhead for correspondence; home internet connection for the Minister; digital voice recorders for the Minister and advisers; magazine subscriptions (supposedly portfolio-related); etc. etc. And that’s before you start talking about office furniture and equipment, most of which is paid for by the Department of Finance.

Have a read of http://www.finance.gov.au/parliamentary-services/docs/senators_and_members_entitlements.pdf if you’re interested – and you’ll start to understand the amount of money which gets thrown out the window every time there’s a reshuffle.

Report this comment

7
steveu 6:05 pm
12 Dec 11
#

Longshanks is spot on. Whats even more costly is the internal restructures and accommodation move, all that the whim of the Senior Executive Service (SES) who seeks to change things for the sake of changing things. Unless there are savings to be demonstrated, then SES shouldnt be given a carte-blanche to waste public money in this way. I would love to see senate estimates get into a few government departments over this.

Report this comment

8
I-filed 6:46 pm
12 Dec 11
#

According to Barry Cassidy, the only reason for expanding the cabinet is that Peter Garrett threatened to walk back to being a rock star. Gillard had asked him to leave the ministry. So much for “stamp of authority”!

Report this comment

9
benno1 7:06 pm
12 Dec 11
#

Nicola Roxon totally screwed up with Health & Aging, so lets put her in charge of the nations security instead??

Report this comment

10
PantsMan 7:56 pm
12 Dec 11
#

steveu said :

Longshanks is spot on. Whats even more costly is the internal restructures and accommodation move, all that the whim of the Senior Executive Service (SES) who seeks to change things for the sake of changing things. Unless there are savings to be demonstrated, then SES shouldnt be given a carte-blanche to waste public money in this way. I would love to see senate estimates get into a few government departments over this.

We’ll get MORE SES to help ‘manage the transition.’ Three uni students share-housing would be better able to cost effectively move a department and sign a lease on a new building than the SES retards.

It’s just another total taxpayers-funded waste-fest so that a few ministers can have “innovation” or similar crap in their pointless titles. Is the Minister for Emergencies going to have his own Department of Emergencies? FFS!

PS – And just for completeness, Gillard sucks.

Report this comment

11
JessP 8:31 pm
12 Dec 11
#

Got to agree – machinery of government changes cost a motza for little gain.

The cost of moving people from department to department, the creation of departments, systems, leasing buildings even creating letterheads is phenomenal. If only the public knew the real cost!!

Crap.

Report this comment

12
EvanJames 10:24 am
13 Dec 11
#

benno1 said :

Nicola Roxon totally screwed up with Health & Aging, so lets put her in charge of the nations security instead??

How did she screw up Health and Ageing? I thought she did quite well. The department is an utter basket case but I don’t know where you’d start in fixing it. Mark Butler is very impressive too.

Report this comment

13
johnboy 10:27 am
13 Dec 11
#

Moving Emergency Management out of Attorney-Generals appears to be a declaration the war on terror is over.

Which means ASIO and the AFP are in for some major haircuts.

Report this comment

14
PantsMan 11:00 am
13 Dec 11
#

johnboy said :

Moving Emergency Management out of Attorney-Generals appears to be a declaration the war on terror is over.

Which means ASIO and the AFP are in for some major haircuts.

The War on Terror is never over. Free peoples must remain vigilant in the face of the tyranny of those in our World who are the enemies of democracy…
Or some crap like that…

Report this comment

15
PantsMan 11:07 am
13 Dec 11
#

EvanJames said :

benno1 said :

Nicola Roxon totally screwed up with Health & Aging, so lets put her in charge of the nations security instead??

How did she screw up Health and Ageing? I thought she did quite well. The department is an utter basket case but I don’t know where you’d start in fixing it. Mark Butler is very impressive too.

Given the Commonwealth Health Department does not employ any doctors or nurses, but rather develops ‘policy’ like Kevin Rudd’s Your Health website, I don’t think it could be a bigger waste of money. We sent a letter to Health once about technical amendments and a year later someone who spoke at about three words per minute rang us and said that they were going to think about it. They later refused to agree because “something else was also happening in this area, and this might be too much to try all at once.”

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site