Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Don’t blame Maccas for your fat kid

By johnboy - 22 November 2012 21

The ANU has the bad news for parents that physical activity has more to do with childhood obesity than what they eat.

So blaming junk food advertising isn’t going to cut it.

Lead researcher Professor Richard Telford from the ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment and the Clinical Trials Unit at The Canberra Hospital said the new aspect of the LOOK study provides some of the strongest evidence to date in the important debate around how best to tackle childhood obesity.

“Our four-year study of 734 otherwise healthy Australian children in the general community, aged between 8 and 12 years, found that the main difference between lean and overweight children was that lean children were more physically active,” Professor Telford said.

“Children with a higher proportion of body fat, even those considered obese, did not consume more kilojoules – they did not eat more fat, carbohydrate or sugar – than those who were lean.

“Indeed, our study found that leaner boys actually consumed more kilojoules over the four years of the study than overweight boys, but were much more physically active.

“The data also indicated that if a child became more active during the four years he or she became leaner. Alternatively, a child who became less active increased his or her body fat percent.”

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
21 Responses to
Don’t blame Maccas for your fat kid
1
bundah 6:51 pm
22 Nov 12
#

No way, really, who woulda thought? In the words of one Mr. Miyagi wax on wax off!

Report this comment

2
gooterz 8:29 pm
22 Nov 12
#

So the nazi treatment of school lunches by the government was all for nothing.

Applause for all those that think kids would be as fit, healthy and active on a salad.

Report this comment

3
Tetranitrate 9:06 pm
22 Nov 12
#

bundah said :

No way, really, who woulda thought? In the words of one Mr. Miyagi wax on wax off!

This isn’t really that obvious – the research is attempting to quantify the influence of various factors, and it’s very much worthwhile to know that physical activity is significantly more influential than diet.
That’s not some kind of intuitive fact that ‘everybody already knows’.

Report this comment

4
wildturkeycanoe 8:23 am
23 Nov 12
#

Norm from the “Life Be In It” campaign pointed this out nearly 40 years ago. Why did it take a university study and how much spending to find out what we already knew?

Report this comment

5
devils_advocate 8:53 am
23 Nov 12
#

I’m not questioning this research, however I will admit to finding it completely counter-intuitive and surprising. I know for myself, it is extemely difficult to get a shred going if I have even one cheat meal, I have to eat clean for weeks to get lean. For me, it’s definitely the quality of calories that counts, not just the quantity.

Probably kid’s metabamolism thingies work differently. Don’t know if this means that I would suddenly start feeding my kids bulk amounts of crap but it’s still very interesting, and food for thought.

I’d be interested to know the outcome of similar research on adults.

Report this comment

6
Tetranitrate 9:36 am
23 Nov 12
#

devils_advocate said :

I’m not questioning this research, however I will admit to finding it completely counter-intuitive and surprising. I know for myself, it is extemely difficult to get a shred going if I have even one cheat meal, I have to eat clean for weeks to get lean. For me, it’s definitely the quality of calories that counts, not just the quantity.

Probably kid’s metabamolism thingies work differently. Don’t know if this means that I would suddenly start feeding my kids bulk amounts of crap but it’s still very interesting, and food for thought.

I’d be interested to know the outcome of similar research on adults.

Agreed when it comes to my personal experience as well – my guess is that it’s probably more to do the more physically active ones having higher base metabolic rates + energy expenditure from regular activity soas to have much higher energy needs.

Report this comment

7
NoImRight 10:05 am
23 Nov 12
#

I dont think pointing out that exercise helps keep weight down means a proper diet is somehow now excluded. You cant just start wolfing down burgers while spouting “this isnt why Im fat”. A proper balance of diet and exercise is what we should be aiming for, not just looking for a single villian as an excuse.

Report this comment

8
devils_advocate 10:21 am
23 Nov 12
#

NoImRight said :

I dont think pointing out that exercise helps keep weight down means a proper diet is somehow now excluded. You cant just start wolfing down burgers while spouting “this isnt why Im fat”. A proper balance of diet and exercise is what we should be aiming for, not just looking for a single villian as an excuse.

I don’t think anyone’s saying it’s excluded, it’s just far less important than we previously thought. I personally think the 4 year longitudinal study puts this research head and shoulders above most other studies in the field, or at least the ones that have been publicised by the mainstream media.

Report this comment

9
devils_advocate 10:27 am
23 Nov 12
#

Tetranitrate said :

Agreed when it comes to my personal experience as well – my guess is that it’s probably more to do the more physically active ones having higher base metabolic rates + energy expenditure from regular activity soas to have much higher energy needs.

Well I have a pretty high base metabolic rate, and I am actually a good test/experiment subject in that my physical activity is very, very constant from one week to the next, the only change from one week to the next is my diet (including alcohol intake). If I eat just lean steak, veg and small amount of clean carbs, all is good. If I get lazy and eat junk, the effects become visible pretty quickly.

Whereas, this study seems to be suggesting that carbs, sugar and fat are not a significant predictor/not strongly correllated with obesity in children, rather its the level of activity. This is the bit that is surprising to me.

Report this comment

10
astrojax 12:47 pm
23 Nov 12
#

my kid’s fat – i blame macdonald’s…*

[*neither astromonkey or astro chicken are actually fat – quite lean, in fact – though i have never given maccas a cent of my hard earned… coincidence?]

Report this comment

11
Erg0 12:54 pm
23 Nov 12
#

devils_advocate said :

Whereas, this study seems to be suggesting that carbs, sugar and fat are not a significant predictor/not strongly correllated with obesity in children, rather its the level of activity. This is the bit that is surprising to me.

The key phrase there is probably “in children”. From what I gather, their metabolisms work pretty differently to an adult’s.

Report this comment

12
Diggety 1:24 pm
23 Nov 12
#

Don’t blame Maccas for your fat kid

Blame your kid.

Report this comment

13
Tetranitrate 1:48 pm
23 Nov 12
#

devils_advocate said :

Whereas, this study seems to be suggesting that carbs, sugar and fat are not a significant predictor/not strongly correllated with obesity in children, rather its the level of activity. This is the bit that is surprising to me.

Remember we’re talking about trends across a population.

We haven’t yet done a study where we take active kids, sedentary kids, divide both groups into control groups and test groups, then force feed the test groups McDonalds.

Report this comment

14
NoImRight 2:19 pm
23 Nov 12
#

Diggety said :

Don’t blame Maccas for your fat kid

Blame your kid.

Its my kid’s fault your kid is fat?

Report this comment

15
Pork Hunt 5:32 pm
23 Nov 12
#

I trust this is the same Dick Telford who was the founding director of the AIS ?

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site