Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Transport

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Drink driver smashes into the Belco Coles Express

By johnboy - 14 March 2013 22

coles belconnen

A 38-year-old Belconnen man was more than three times over the legal limit when his vehicle collided with a service station last night (Wednesday March 13).

Around 10pm the disqualified driver failed to control the black Nissan Z51 Murano when entering the Belconnen Shell service station. The vehicle struck a petrol bowser before crashing into the Coles shop-front. No-one was injured during the incident.

The man, whose licence had been disqualified for a previous drink-driving offence, returned a positive road-side screening test and was transported to Belconnen Police Station for breath analysis.

The driver returned a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) reading of 0.169.

The man will face ACT Magistrates Court, where he will be charged with driving whilst over the prescribed concentration of alcohol and driving whilst
disqualified.

Acting Superintendent of Traffic Operations Rod Anderson said incidents like this demonstrate the dangers of drink-driving.

“I’m astounded at the actions of this man. Driving intoxicated into an area full of combustible liquids has the potential to create a real disaster, particularly in one of our more populated areas. It’s extremely fortunate this incident didn’t have a worse outcome. The community has every right to be outraged by his behaviour”, A/Supt Anderson said.

ACT Policing urge observe anyone you believe may be driving intoxicated, or driving in a dangerous manner, you to report it to Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000, or via www.act.crimestoppers.com.au. Information can be provided anonymously.

[Courtesy ACT Policing]

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
22 Responses to
Drink driver smashes into the Belco Coles Express
1
Ben_Dover 3:07 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Ok, I’ll start the bidding at a year’s weekend detention, any takers?

Report this comment

2
bundah 3:14 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Ben_Dover said :

Ok, I’ll start the bidding at a year’s weekend detention, any takers?

You’re kidding at worst he’ll get his licence suspended probably for no more than a week and he’ll have to write an essay!

Report this comment

3
p996911turbo 3:21 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Whoa, that’s a bit more of a crash than “failed to control the black Nissan…” prepared me for.

Report this comment

4
Ben_Dover 3:26 pm
14 Mar 13
#

bundah said :

You’re kidding at worst he’ll get his licence suspended probably for no more than a week and he’ll have to write an essay!

Only bad cricketers get sentenced to essay writing.

Report this comment

5
damien haas 3:46 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Its a very good thing no one was injured, this ticks all the boxes for massive disaster potential.

Report this comment

6
bundah 3:47 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Ben_Dover said :

bundah said :

You’re kidding at worst he’ll get his licence suspended probably for no more than a week and he’ll have to write an essay!

Only bad cricketers get sentenced to essay writing.

At this rate we’ll need to drive a car through the stumps if we stand any chance of pulling off a win.

Report this comment

7
thatsnotme 4:04 pm
14 Mar 13
#

It brings a smile to my face to know that as a disqualified, drunk driver, this loser won’t be insured – so had likely written off an expensive car for which he hopefully still owes money, and will be liable for the damage done to the service station. The magistrate may end up giving him a slap on the wrist, but I doubt the shop’s insurance company will let him off as easily.

Report this comment

8
shirty_bear 4:14 pm
14 Mar 13
#

thatsnotme said :

It brings a smile to my face to know that as a disqualified, drunk driver, this loser won’t be insured – so had likely written off an expensive car for which he hopefully still owes money, and will be liable for the damage done to the service station. The magistrate may end up giving him a slap on the wrist, but I doubt the shop’s insurance company will let him off as easily.

Initially pleasing to think champ will cop a massive damages bill … until you consider that he’ll just cop a $10/week dole reduction for the rest of his life … will never get anywhere near covering actual costs.

Will get an additional licence disqualification too … but what does the duration matter when you’re already driving while disqualified?

Report this comment

9
Jivrashia 4:17 pm
14 Mar 13
#

thatsnotme said :

I doubt the shop’s insurance company will let him off as easily.

I doubt that the offender has any care for that kind of stuff.

Who in their right mind would get behind a wheel, disqualified, drunk to stupor, and drive at such speed as to smash through a shop?

I’m guessing this but the guy appears to be on a path to self-destruction.

Report this comment

10
Reprobate 4:28 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Acting Superintendent of Traffic Operations Rod Anderson said incidents like this demonstrate the dangers of drink-driving.
“I’m astounded at the actions of this man. Driving intoxicated into an area full of combustible liquids has the potential to create a real disaster, particularly in one of our more populated areas.”

1) Duh!
2) Not sure that the loser, er alleged perp, had cognitive consideration that this particular sequence of events would occur.

Oh, and
“The man, whose licence had been disqualified for a previous drink-driving offence…”
Time for mandatory alcohol interlocks to be fitted on all vehicles garaged at an offender’s address, even for a first/low range offence. Cost to be borne by the offender instead of a fine.

Report this comment

11
thatsnotme 4:32 pm
14 Mar 13
#

shirty_bear said :

thatsnotme said :

It brings a smile to my face to know that as a disqualified, drunk driver, this loser won’t be insured – so had likely written off an expensive car for which he hopefully still owes money, and will be liable for the damage done to the service station. The magistrate may end up giving him a slap on the wrist, but I doubt the shop’s insurance company will let him off as easily.

Initially pleasing to think champ will cop a massive damages bill … until you consider that he’ll just cop a $10/week dole reduction for the rest of his life … will never get anywhere near covering actual costs.

Will get an additional licence disqualification too … but what does the duration matter when you’re already driving while disqualified?

I’m making some assumptions here, which could well be wrong, but if this guy actually owns the car he was driving, it doesn’t strike me as the type of car your average white commodore driving dole bludger could affford. That model of Murano was released in 2009, and 2nd hand models still go for almost $30k. They’re closer to $50k new.

Although after an effort like this, I’d not be surprised if he needed the dole pretty quickly.

Report this comment

12
p996911turbo 4:48 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Reprobate said :

Time for mandatory alcohol interlocks to be fitted on all vehicles garaged at an offender’s address, even for a first/low range offence. Cost to be borne by the offender instead of a fine.

So say you were lucky that evening at your local restaurant and the waiter put just a little more wine into your glass. And then you left early. You had thought about it, you’d only had one glass, you had no intention of drink driving but you just hadn’t calculated it quite right. You get pulled over, you get done at .051. You were one thousandth of a percent over the prescribed amount. Bugger. Do you really think that should require interlocks fitted to all your cars? At your expense?

You can drive at 84 km/h in a school zone and only lose 4 points off your licence but if you get caught at 0.051 you think interlocks should go on all your cars? That’s just idiotic.

It’s different for high range or multiple offences but a first time low range offence doesn’t deserve that level of punishment.

Report this comment

13
peitab 4:50 pm
14 Mar 13
#

I never understand why they’re not charged with an offence over the damage they’ve caused as well.

Report this comment

14
Reprobate 5:07 pm
14 Mar 13
#

“You drink, you drive, you get pulled over, you get done at .051. You were over the prescribed amount. Bugger. Do you really think that should require interlocks fitted to all your cars? At your expense?” Edited – for brevity and legal clarity. Yes.

“You can drive at 84 km/h in a school zone and only lose 4 points off your licence but if you get caught at 0.051 you think interlocks should go on all your cars? That’s just idiotic.” No, idiotic is allowing people to pay a fine into consolidated revenue rather than a preventative measure to reduce the risk of a repeat incident. I’ve previously argued that instead of speeding fines, people should pay to attend a half-day driving skills/attitude readjustment course. Excess speed can be checked and acted upon by a driver in the car (speedo/GPS) but DUI can’t – at present.

It’s different for high range or multiple offences but a first time low range offence doesn’t deserve that level of punishment. Clearly you’re ok with driving just a little illegally and impaired, me not so much. Nor with sending out the signal that you can get caught once and get a free pass.

Report this comment

15
Genie 6:12 pm
14 Mar 13
#

I hope the insurance company fails to pay out, and the idiot has to fix that car and pay for damages…

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site