Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Fair work rings a death knell for the community sector?

By johnboy - 1 February 2012 40

The “community sector” as its come to be known is a series of organisations being paid by the government to provide social services that would otherwise be the responsibility of the Government.

It’s grown like topsy in the last 20 years because the community sector providers have found cheaper ways to deliver services than Governments can manage.

A major way they’ve done this is by finding people willing to do the work for much less money than Governments have been able to do.

Today the Greens’ Meredith Hunter is celebrating the decision by Fair Work Australia to pay community sector workers the same wages as government social workers.

“In May 2011, Fair Work Australia found that employees in the SACS industry are predominantly women and are generally remunerated at a level below that of employees of state and local governments who perform similar work,” ACT Greens Leader, Meredith Hunter, said today.

“This brought to the public’s attention a fact many in the community sector have known for a long time, namely that much of this vital work has been undervalued and underpaid.”

“After many months of waiting, today’s announcement of pay increases of between 18-40% over 8 years is a much needed validation of the important work of over 200,000 people nationally, working in social services, disability support and other community services.

Which rather renders the community sector redundant and certainly means we’re going to have less services, and probably less employment.

But it will be more fair.

UPDATE: Minister for Community Services Joy Burch has announced that in the short term the ACT Government is going to make good the difference:

“I am pleased to announce that we will fund the increased salary costs for community sector organisations that deliver programs through agreements with the ACT Government,” Ms Burch said.

“The ACT Labor Government’s commitment means that many Community Sector workers will receive significant wage increases without their employers having to compromise on service delivery to fund the outcome of the case.”

“Today the ACT Labor Government is standing up to support community workers with fair pay, particularly for women, who make up the bulk of the workforce in the sector.”

Ms Burch said she was pleased that the ACT Council of social Services had welcomed the ACT Government’s announcement, as the Government had worked closely with the sector to develop the best response for the community and the sector.

She said the impact of the decision on the Budget would be proportionately less in the ACT than other jurisdictions, as community workers here were already paid more than their interstate counterparts.

“Thanks to a tradition of support by the ACT Labor Government, at least 85 per cent of employers in the community sector in the ACT currently pay their employees above the Award.

“We understand the sector will require support over the phase in period as the new Award impacts upon them, and the Government is today providing certainty that funding will be increased by an amount equivalent to the impact on their salary costs.”

Preliminiary calculations estimate the impact of today’s decision on the ACT Government to be $27 million over eight years.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
40 Responses to
Fair work rings a death knell for the community sector?
1
eh_steve 10:07 am
02 Feb 12
#

And the Commonwealth is going to pay their share too.

These organisations are still going to be able to get the job done at a much lower rate than the Government ever could.

Programs like Building the Education Revolution, or those expensive kiosks at LBG, or any other number of programs demonstrate the cost of bureaucracy is more than just higher pay for workers.

I am sick of hearing this described as a gender equality issue . Commentators consistently say that people doing a similar job outside of the Community Sector get paid more, which is true. Or at least it was until yesterday.

However, those workers are also mostly female, so the difference in rates of pay has absolutely nothing to do with gender, and yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

Report this comment

2
Onceler 10:30 am
02 Feb 12
#

eh_steve said :

And the Commonwealth is going to pay their share too.

These organisations are still going to be able to get the job done at a much lower rate than the Government ever could.

Programs like Building the Education Revolution, or those expensive kiosks at LBG, or any other number of programs demonstrate the cost of bureaucracy is more than just higher pay for workers.

I am sick of hearing this described as a gender equality issue . Commentators consistently say that people doing a similar job outside of the Community Sector get paid more, which is true. Or at least it was until yesterday.

However, those workers are also mostly female, so the difference in rates of pay has absolutely nothing to do with gender, and yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

It is about gender equality in the sense that this type of work is typically done by women (not always, but more than often), and has been undervalued in terms of remuneration. The pay increase is meant to address that.

Report this comment

3
poetix 10:30 am
02 Feb 12
#

eh_steve said :

I am sick of hearing this described as a gender equality issue . Commentators consistently say that people doing a similar job outside of the Community Sector get paid more, which is true. Or at least it was until yesterday.

However, those workers are also mostly female, so the difference in rates of pay has absolutely nothing to do with gender, and yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

But if most of the community workers are female, and the pay just went up, that will slightly close the wage gap between male and female workers, and so it is about gender equality in a wider sense.

Report this comment

4
Jim Jones 10:59 am
02 Feb 12
#

eh_steve said :

yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

Completely untrue.

Report this comment

5
colourful sydney rac 11:11 am
02 Feb 12
#

eh_steve said :

yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

Simply wrong.

Report this comment

6
eh_steve 12:06 pm
02 Feb 12
#

How can it be about gender, when the argument is that people doing the same job in other sectors get paid more.

The people doing that same job, and getting paid more, are mostly females too.

So this decision hasn’t brought the wages of women doing the same job as men onto the same level, it has brought women doing the same job as other women onto the same level.

It is a good decision, but the context it has been placed in is misleading.

Report this comment

7
EvanJames 12:16 pm
02 Feb 12
#

The sector is female-dominated, and the type of work is female-dominated. Put them both together, and you have the situation where this work is under-valued.

compare this with what’s happened in the trades and trades assistant/labouring roles in recent times. The bloke I buy my coffee from rants about how some of the blokes doing a build in the district come in, they can’t string a sentence together yet they’re on $70 – $120 an hour.

Yet all these people in the caring occupations that are community-based are working for pitiful rates of pay.

Report this comment

8
Erg0 12:59 pm
02 Feb 12
#

EvanJames said :

The sector is female-dominated, and the type of work is female-dominated. Put them both together, and you have the situation where this work is under-valued.

I’m not sure I understand this correctly, are you asserting that they were being paid less because they’re female?

It seems overly simplistic to compare construction workers to community workers without accounting for differing rates of unionisation, profit vs non-profit industries, training requirements, availability of skilled workers, etc. I absolutely agree that community work is/was undervalued, but there’s a lot more behind that than simple gender politics.

Report this comment

9
chewy14 1:13 pm
02 Feb 12
#

Jim Jones said :

eh_steve said :

yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

Completely untrue.

Exactly,
It’s set true gender equality back a long way.

Report this comment

10
chewy14 1:15 pm
02 Feb 12
#

EvanJames said :

The sector is female-dominated, and the type of work is female-dominated. Put them both together, and you have the situation where this work is under-valued.

compare this with what’s happened in the trades and trades assistant/labouring roles in recent times. The bloke I buy my coffee from rants about how some of the blokes doing a build in the district come in, they can’t string a sentence together yet they’re on $70 – $120 an hour.

Yet all these people in the caring occupations that are community-based are working for pitiful rates of pay.

Why don’t these women go and do a trade if its so easy and the pay is so wonderful?

Report this comment

11
Deref 2:18 pm
02 Feb 12
#

“It’s grown like topsy in the last 20 years because the community sector providers have paid their workers less than Governments do.”

I fixed that for you.

Report this comment

12
EvanJames 2:43 pm
02 Feb 12
#

Odd that there’s no mention in all of this of the non-profit tax rort, that many non-profits use to bump their pay scales up. It adds about $15 grand or so to each pay packet and saves non-profits a heap of salary money.

Report this comment

13
Ben_Dover 2:52 pm
02 Feb 12
#

eh_steve said :

How can it be about gender, when the argument is that people doing the same job in other sectors get paid more.

The people doing that same job, and getting paid more, are mostly females too.

That is a falacy, people are not doing “the same job”.

Report this comment

14
Jim Jones 3:01 pm
02 Feb 12
#

chewy14 said :

Jim Jones said :

eh_steve said :

yesterday’s decision has nothing to do with gender equality.

Completely untrue.

Exactly,
It’s set true gender equality back a long way.

You believe that raising pay scales of traditionally female dominated/associated industries to an equal level as those of male dominated/associated industries is ‘setting true gender equality back’?

Next you’ll be arguing that the end of apartheid was a massive blow to racial equality.

Report this comment

15
watto23 3:01 pm
02 Feb 12
#

I’m struggling to see the gender equality side of it myself.
If a male was working in the community sector, he’d be getting paid the same as a female.

The real issue was the sector itself was deemed to be underpaid, compared to say office workers in general. This has nothing to do with gender equality IMO, but they use the gender equality argument because it works.

Gender equality is you do the same job you get paid the same. OK so maybe male dominated industries are paid more, but its not anything to do with gender, its to do with the services provided and what people are willing to pay for them. It seems people have no issues overpaying trades people, but there are plenty of female tradies earning a packet (ok so its far from 50-50).

Report this comment

1 2 3

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site