Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Politics

Sponsored by Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Firm appointed to investigate further routes for light rail in Canberra

By Canfan - 29 April 2014 21

Minister for the Environment and Sustainable Development, Simon Corbell, has today announced the appointment of consulting firms Arup, CBRE, Tract, Brown Consulting and Purdon Associates to undertake the Canberra Light Rail Master Plan project.

“The tender process for this important project was highly competitive with eight submissions received, including both national and international companies” Mr Corbell said.

“The government committed to a light rail network from Gungahlin to Civic in 2012. Work is currently being undertaken on the first stage with construction to begin in 2016.”

“It is also important for us to begin investigations on where future stages of this network will go, which includes Russell, Canberra Airport, the Parliamentary Triangle, Kingston, Woden, Erindale, Tuggeranong, Belconnen, Kippax, Lanyon, Weston Creek and Molonglo. Our goal is to ensure we get the best value for money, while providing world class public transport options for the Canberra community.”

The master plan project will explore options for a potential future citywide light rail network that will seek to maximise the significant social, economic and environmental opportunities that light rail transport can provide to cities.

“Public consultation is an important component of this project and community engagement will be sought on potential network options later in the year.”

The Capital Metro Agency will continue to focus on the delivery of Capital Metro Stage one between Gungahlin and City, while the ACT Government investigates potential future extensions of the light rail network.

The draft Light Rail Master Plan will be completed by early 2015. For more information visit www.transport.act.gov.au. Information on the current work being undertaken on Stage 1 of Capital Metro (Gungahlin to city centre) can be found at www.capitalmetro.act.gov.au

(Simon Corbell media release)

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
21 Responses to
Firm appointed to investigate further routes for light rail in Canberra
1
bigred 10:47 pm
29 Apr 14
#

Simon cynically trying to win green tinged votes before the next election. He lost mine forever when he agreed to build the road to nowhere, AKA GDE. Hope he loses his seat next time around.

Report this comment

2
magiccar9 11:22 pm
29 Apr 14
#

“World class public transport options”. WTF is he on about? Has he actually used our failure of a bus network? Gets you nowhere you need to go in triple the time it should.

I honestly don’t think we need whatever his solution is to be “world class”. Canberrans just need it to take them where they need to go within a reasonable timeframe. Simple.

Report this comment

3
miz 11:37 pm
29 Apr 14
#

Two words – Monaro Highway. Not that I think it will ever actually make it to Tuggeranong. And I concur with your thoughts about Mr Corbell, bigred.

Report this comment

4
gooterz 11:51 pm
29 Apr 14
#

So we have Capital Metro Agency focusing on building light rail and then we have another group doing a study for the rest of Canberra. If this was a real plan wouldn’t they just increase the budget of capital metro. As the first leg of the rail should feed into the planning for the rest of it. Otherwise they’ll both do the same work and end up wasting a great deal of our money.

“world class public transport options for the Canberra community.”
First or third?

Report this comment

5
housebound 7:25 am
30 Apr 14
#

This is a better idea than the Northbourne disaster. Why not start with that (Civic to railway station line) and extend it to the airport?

The Libs are saying they’ll stop construction. They won’t be able to: all those contracts will have been locked in, the trees on Northbourne demolished, and the road dug up. Not because Labor back the idea, but because they’ll want to make it impossible for the Libs to change anything on the very, very slim chance they actually manage to win an election.

Report this comment

6
dungfungus 7:30 am
30 Apr 14
#

“The master plan project will explore options for a potential future citywide light rail network that will seek to maximise the significant social, economic and environmental opportunities that light rail transport can provide to cities.”

I thought the primary purpose of light rail (or any type of mass transit system for that matter) was to move people from A to B.
No mention of this in any recent media releases from our Minister; its now about encouraging development along the rail corridor to generate revenue from rates. What a con.

And having named most of the places that they want the light rail to go they are going to fork out more millions for consultants to confim that.

They have lost the plot completely.

Pray that they don’t get re-elected.

Report this comment

7
HiddenDragon 9:46 am
30 Apr 14
#

The detachment from fiscal reality is utterly breathtaking. Rather than looking at ways to spend further very large amounts of borrowed money on unnecessary projects, the ACT Government should be battening down the hatches and looking to make Canberra an attractive place for businesses which do not rely on federal spending.

Only those who have spent their whole adult life firmly attached to the public treat could think that a massively expensive (to build and run) tram system will help to make Canberra an attractive place to establish and run commercially sustainable businesses – and that’s what we need to offset the federal cutbacks. If this goes ahead, the resultant increases in ACT Government rates, taxes and charges will simply see more commercial activity moving out of Canberra, not into it.

As a footnote, I have no doubt that paid parking everywhere (not just in town centres), and reduced numbers of parking spaces, will be used to “encourage” people to use the trams.

Report this comment

8
wildturkeycanoe 10:04 am
30 Apr 14
#

Has anyone considered how much it will cost to ride this fantasy train in order to recoup the costs of building it?

Report this comment

9
VYBerlinaV8_is_back 12:19 pm
30 Apr 14
#

HiddenDragon said :

The detachment from fiscal reality is utterly breathtaking. Rather than looking at ways to spend further very large amounts of borrowed money on unnecessary projects, the ACT Government should be battening down the hatches and looking to make Canberra an attractive place for businesses which do not rely on federal spending.

Only those who have spent their whole adult life firmly attached to the public treat could think that a massively expensive (to build and run) tram system will help to make Canberra an attractive place to establish and run commercially sustainable businesses – and that’s what we need to offset the federal cutbacks. If this goes ahead, the resultant increases in ACT Government rates, taxes and charges will simply see more commercial activity moving out of Canberra, not into it.

As a footnote, I have no doubt that paid parking everywhere (not just in town centres), and reduced numbers of parking spaces, will be used to “encourage” people to use the trams.

Spot on.

Report this comment

10
Canfan 12:48 pm
30 Apr 14
#

Media Release from Jeremy Hanson’s office today:
The Canberra Liberals will fight the ACT Labor government’s case for light rail in the lead up to the 2016 ACT Election because it simply doesn’t stack up for Canberra.

A light rail line from Gungahlin to the City at a cost of $614 million is not good value and given the government’s record of delivering infrastructure, there’s every chance the cost and timeline will blow-out.

This is a line in the sand and the Canberra Liberals won’t back away from responsible use of taxpayers’ money.

Report this comment

11
house_husband 1:09 pm
30 Apr 14
#

housebound said :

The Libs are saying they’ll stop construction. They won’t be able to: all those contracts will have been locked in, the trees on Northbourne demolished, and the road dug up.

I can see this will be the ACT equivalent to the Victorian desalination plant. A massive capital project that ends up a white elephant that will take a generation to pay off.

No doubt to estimate passenger numbers they’ll use the same consultants who provided overinflated figures for the various tunnels that saw less than half the numbers.

Also what I would like to know is who is going to be accountable if it goes off the rails? The Greens, Labor, Capital Metro? Or will they all point fingers at each other and duck for cover ?

Report this comment

12
dungfungus 1:22 pm
30 Apr 14
#

HiddenDragon said :

The detachment from fiscal reality is utterly breathtaking. Rather than looking at ways to spend further very large amounts of borrowed money on unnecessary projects, the ACT Government should be battening down the hatches and looking to make Canberra an attractive place for businesses which do not rely on federal spending.

Only those who have spent their whole adult life firmly attached to the public treat could think that a massively expensive (to build and run) tram system will help to make Canberra an attractive place to establish and run commercially sustainable businesses – and that’s what we need to offset the federal cutbacks. If this goes ahead, the resultant increases in ACT Government rates, taxes and charges will simply see more commercial activity moving out of Canberra, not into it.

As a footnote, I have no doubt that paid parking everywhere (not just in town centres), and reduced numbers of parking spaces, will be used to “encourage” people to use the trams.

Pity the daily commuters who live in Bungendore and Yass who have no other choice but to use their own cars which if not already are going to cost them up to $11 a day to park in Canberra.
Everyone in Canberra at least has access to ACTION buses which may not be ideal to drop off and pick up the kids but they have the choice.

Report this comment

13
dtc 3:38 pm
30 Apr 14
#

wildturkeycanoe said :

Has anyone considered how much it will cost to ride this fantasy train in order to recoup the costs of building it?

I trust that you make the same argument whenever a new road (GDE, Majura Parkway etc) is built.

Indeed, the Majura Parkway will cost $300m on its own and will give a return of… well, nothing. Like every other road.

Report this comment

14
dtc 3:40 pm
30 Apr 14
#

dungfungus said :

Pity the daily commuters who live in Bungendore and Yass who have no other choice but to use their own cars which if not already are going to cost them up to $11 a day to park in Canberra.
Everyone in Canberra at least has access to ACTION buses which may not be ideal to drop off and pick up the kids but they have the choice.

Perhaps if you lived in Canberra and contributed to the cost of ACTION, or the roads, or the other stuff through your rates or whatever, then you might have a more sympathetic audience.

Report this comment

15
Postalgeek 4:00 pm
30 Apr 14
#

HiddenDragon said :

TAs a footnote, I have no doubt that paid parking everywhere (not just in town centres), and reduced numbers of parking spaces, will be used to “encourage” people to use the trams.

Or else tollways for roads running parallel to the light rail, forcing people to support the light rail either way.

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site