Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Politics

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Legislative Assembly increases to 25 members from the 2016 election

By Canfan - 6 August 2014 21

Canberrans will have a better level of representation after legislation passed yesterday increasing the size of the ACT Legislative Assembly from 17 to 25 MLAs from the 2016 election.

With bipartisan support, the Assembly passed two bills introduced by Attorney-General, Simon Corbell, to increase representation of ACT citizens and improve representative democracy in the territory.

“Following the recommendations of the expert reference group, the Assembly has decided to increase its size from 17 to 25 members, and increase the number of electorates from three to five,” Mr Corbell said.

“As Canberra’s population has grown, it is appropriate to increase the number of representatives at a territory level to ensure the best government possible for the people of Canberra.

“As highlighted by the expert reference group, the ratio of elected representatives to the number of enrolled voters in the ACT is higher than any other state or territory in Australia. That is, there are more enrolled voters per elected representative than anywhere else Australia. The ACT has 5.6 representatives per 100,000 people compared to the national average of 26 representatives per 100,000.”

In making its recommendation to increasing the size of the Assembly, the expert reference group considered factors such as the ability of the Assembly to adequately represent the ACT community and to deliver effective government to the ACT community.

The combined effect of the Australian Capital Territory (Legislative Assembly) Bill 2014 and the Electoral Amendment Bill 2014 is to increase the membership of the assembly and the number of electorates, plus a number of consequential amendments such as changes to ballot papers.

The next step will be the redistribution of electoral boundaries, including the naming of the new electorates. This process will commence with a call for public submissions by the Redistribution Committee, chaired by the Electoral Commissioner, and will include several opportunities for public comment throughout a six to eight-month process. The final determination of the new electoral boundaries will be made by the Augmented ACT Electoral Commission.

(Simon Corbell Media Release)

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
21 Responses to
Legislative Assembly increases to 25 members from the 2016 election
1
A_Cog 2:13 pm
06 Aug 14
#

Yay! More worse representation!

Report this comment

2
MERC600 2:41 pm
06 Aug 14
#

Why not go the whole hog. Lets have an upper house as well.

Report this comment

3
John Hargreaves Ex M 5:19 pm
06 Aug 14
#

Noticed that the Greens Party have cried foul cos they need 16% for a quota instead of the 12% Rattenbury got! Diddums!

Let’s give the minor parties a fair go, cos they are more responsible than the majors. check out Ricky Muir, the Palmer Party, Pauline Hanson etc.

Pollies who get in and exercise the balance of power with such a miniscule vote will always cry foul. But do they express the will of a majority or even close to it? Nah!

Report this comment

4
Holden Caulfield 5:24 pm
06 Aug 14
#

The first sentence should read…

“Canberrans will have an increased level of representation…”

It’s a bold claim to say it will be “better”.

Report this comment

5
bikhet 5:34 pm
06 Aug 14
#

More snouts in the trough! If the current lot are the best their parties can do, then I shudder to think what the new ones will be like.

Report this comment

6
HiddenDragon 5:53 pm
06 Aug 14
#

John Hargreaves Ex MLA said :

Noticed that the Greens Party have cried foul cos they need 16% for a quota instead of the 12% Rattenbury got! Diddums!

Let’s give the minor parties a fair go, cos they are more responsible than the majors. check out Ricky Muir, the Palmer Party, Pauline Hanson etc.

Pollies who get in and exercise the balance of power with such a miniscule vote will always cry foul. But do they express the will of a majority or even close to it? Nah!

I can’t imagine what they’re worried about – with reports of polling showing majority support for the trams, Shane will surely be re-elected by acclamation and pick up a spare quota, or two, along the way……

Report this comment

7
Maya123 6:07 pm
06 Aug 14
#

Personally I think the ACT should have one electorate. If I want to approach someone I don’t have a clue who my so-called local politician is, but rather I would approach the person who will deal with the issue, and I would image this would be the same with many people, if not most. And one electorate would better represent the wishes of more people. Of course this isn’t favourable to Labor or Liberal, so they would not want this. It doesn’t matter that there might be people who will feel unrepresented; that isn’t important to them. It ‘s what is advantageous to them, not the electorate; it isn’t about democracy.

Report this comment

8
dungfungus 7:00 pm
06 Aug 14
#

John Hargreaves Ex MLA said :

Noticed that the Greens Party have cried foul cos they need 16% for a quota instead of the 12% Rattenbury got! Diddums!

Let’s give the minor parties a fair go, cos they are more responsible than the majors. check out Ricky Muir, the Palmer Party, Pauline Hanson etc.

Pollies who get in and exercise the balance of power with such a miniscule vote will always cry foul. But do they express the will of a majority or even close to it? Nah!

“Noticed that the Greens Party have cried foul cos they need 16% for a quota instead of the 12% Rattenbury got! Diddums!”

Don’t try and tell us that this was a surprise to you John.
It was the ACT’s worst kept secret that Canberra Labor saw this as an opportunity to wipe out The Greens electoral chances.
The Greens will still give their preferences to Labor though.

Report this comment

9
farnarkler 7:19 pm
06 Aug 14
#

There’s about $1 million in wasted money for their salaries. Can’t wait to see what junket trips the newbies can conjure up. Get rid of this clown show, reinstate the NCDC and follow NSW for taxes, rates, etc.

Report this comment

10
astrojax 7:24 pm
06 Aug 14
#

John Hargreaves Ex MLA said :

Noticed that the Greens Party have cried foul cos they need 16% for a quota instead of the 12% Rattenbury got! Diddums!

Let’s give the minor parties a fair go, cos they are more responsible than the majors. check out Ricky Muir, the Palmer Party, Pauline Hanson etc.

Pollies who get in and exercise the balance of power with such a miniscule vote will always cry foul. But do they express the will of a majority or even close to it? Nah!

but then does an all from-two-parties parliament express the will of a majority, john? or are we better served by having a diversity of views represented in a parliament that has to work across ideas and positions to effect good governance? i think the two party domination is a poor option as an ideal and this only entrenches the likelihood of it perpetuating. maybe twenty five members but in three electorates would produce, ultimately, better politicians and so better governance of the people, for the people..?

[note: i have no alignment or affiliation with any party]

Report this comment

11
gooterz 9:01 pm
06 Aug 14
#

In what world does it make sense to divide into 5.

Guaranteed that at least 1 will vote for the unpopular one leaving them with no representation of the active government.

Is this to scare everyone into voting Labor to avoid ending up like Tuggeranong?

A single whole of ACT will do.

Report this comment

12
rommeldog56 9:21 pm
06 Aug 14
#

Isn’t this just a cynical ploy by both major parties to reduce the likelihood of a minor party holding the balance of power ? At ACT Taxpayer/Ratepayer expense of course !!

This will not mean better Government nor better Gov’t decision making. Just more ACT Gov’t Ministers/MLAs to push the party political line and push even more spin onto the electorate.

Politicians are like a virus, they replicate and spread. They become resistant – to public opinion. Particularly if they are ACT politicians.

Yet another example of over governance and snouts in the trough.

Report this comment

13
dungfungus 9:23 am
07 Aug 14
#

rommeldog56 said :

Isn’t this just a cynical ploy by both major parties to reduce the likelihood of a minor party holding the balance of power ? At ACT Taxpayer/Ratepayer expense of course !!

This will not mean better Government nor better Gov’t decision making.

Just more ACT Gov’t Ministers/MLAs to push the party political line and push even more spin onto the electorate.

Politicians are like a virus, they replicate and spread. They become resistant – to public opinion. Particularly if they are ACT politicians.

Yet another example of over governance and snouts in the trough.

Correct.

Report this comment

14
housebound 6:15 pm
10 Aug 14
#

For the first time in my life, I’m seriously considering voting informal. The usual protest vote – putting a minor party or independent first – won’t work because my vote would end up with one of Lab, Lib, Green. Labor are an appalling government, Greens are Labor stooges, and I don’t want to reward the Libs (or the other two) for their complicity in this move to line the pockets of more politicians.

Report this comment

15
Maya123 8:29 pm
10 Aug 14
#

If 10%, 20%, etc vote for a particular person or party they should have 10%, 20%, etc members of the elected representatives. But they won’t under the five electorates planned; they will in a sense be disenfranchised; which is exactly as the two major parties plan. The fairest representation for a small place like the ACT is one electorate. But this doesn’t please the two largest parties. So for them it’s what suits them the best and damn the voters.
Housebound said they are thinking for the first time voting informally. I know how they feel, as I feel the same. If I thought enough people would do that and send a message I would do the same, also for the first time ever. Instead I will likely put the major parties last. Unfortunately I don’t think enough other people will care enough to do the same.

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site