Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Business

New high performance team wear for cricket clubs - Steve Waugh & ONTHEGO Sports

Loadedog versus the Canberra Times

By johnboy - 13 February 2007 38

[First filed: February 08, 2007 @ 17:53]

You may remember we mentioned in passing Loadedog’s story about a marijuana drought gripping the ACT.

A lot of other news outlets followed up the story. Loadedog and his correspondent were briefly concerned the notoriety would lead to unwanted attention, but soon the storm passed.

Until this Monday when the Canberra Times’ Public Sector Informant grabbed a chunk of the text from the story and (as is too often the case) decided that “local website” was sufficient attribution, rather than actually mentioning the name of the site (as even ratbag bloggers would have the decency to do).

This sort of thing happens to us a lot (although thankfully it has been getting better). Loadedog, however, has more time on his hands and a more finely developed sense of injustice, so he’s off to Media Watch and the Press Council to get their thoughts on the practice. You can read all the details over on his remodeled site.

We await the outcome with interest.

UPDATED: Loadedog has more on the story with the Press Council ruling that journalist’s standards of attribution can be lower than high school students or ratbag bloggers. We await Media Watch’s approach to the issue

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
38 Responses to
Loadedog versus the Canberra Times
1
Hasdrubahl 10:39 pm
08 Feb 07
#

Reminds me of an item on WIN News tonight: structured around a new micro-doc series on the “Hidden Treasures” of the NGA.

The series, said WIN, will be shown on “free to air television” – which is as close as they would come to identifying that the free to air station will in fact be the ABC.

Oh, and it doesn’t help that the series presenter was said (by Jessica Good) to be “Betty Church”…

Report this comment

2
vg 7:11 am
09 Feb 07
#

Canberra print media. Where kids try and learn how to be journalists….but fail

Report this comment

3
Thumper 8:07 am
09 Feb 07
#

Go the Drovers Dogs….

Report this comment

4
West_Kambah_4eva 12:04 pm
09 Feb 07
#

gia.metherell@
canberratimes.com.au

Everyone should email her as I have to express their disgust at her plagiarism and laziness.

I’m not sure who she thinks she is, to say ‘I can do what I want’. After all, she works the the *snicker* Canberra Times, not exactly an internationally known rag…or nationally for that matter.

Report this comment

5
seepi 12:43 pm
09 Feb 07
#

is it really plagiarism if it is in quote marks?

Report this comment

6
terubo 12:53 pm
09 Feb 07
#

This isn’t a case of plagiarism, so much as lack of attribution. The “local website” should’ve been named.

Report this comment

7
Al 1:06 pm
09 Feb 07
#

I’m sure Ms Metherell (who’s probably gonna have to get herself a new email address now – snicker) would be of the opinion that journalistic ethics for giving credit to other journalists does not apply to you bloggers – after all you’re not REAL journos are you?
Just like:
REAL cricket can’t be played in one day.
The net will never replace REAL newspapers.
And my personal favourite:
Windows will NEVER replace MS-DOS.

Report this comment

8
loadedog 2:18 pm
09 Feb 07
#

As much as every word I’ve said about this matter is true, I would encourage everyone here not to engage in cyber-harassment on the basis of an unsubstantiated blog post.

While the evidence of unattributed quotation is incontestable, my remarks about her behaviour on the phone fall into the category of ‘her word against mine’ (I wonder if she wonders whether I recorded the conversation?). If she stands by her words at some stage, then I’d probably support the campaign (my respect for her might creep up a notch or two also), but until that time, I have to say I think you guys are nuts just accepting my word.

For the record, I have never asserted this was a case of plagiarism. It clearly isn’t.

Report this comment

9
ozmreeee 2:44 pm
09 Feb 07
#

As a former CT journo friend of mine once quipped, “… the CT hasn’t broken a story in the last 10 years and they only print a story once it’s appeared somewhere else!”

Report this comment

10
bonfire 3:08 pm
09 Feb 07
#

i get better local coverage from ra than the ct.

enough said.

Report this comment

11
terubo 3:35 pm
09 Feb 07
#

Hear hear! I mean, would the CT publish CrazyChester’s rantings? No.

Report this comment

12
Thumper 3:51 pm
09 Feb 07
#

And an email campaign is petty and certainly not warranted.

Report this comment

13
Ralph 3:01 pm
13 Feb 07
#

That letter from the Press Council just sounds like their standard ‘piss off’ form of words.

Report this comment

14
Hasdrubahl 3:03 pm
13 Feb 07
#

The response from the PC seems reasonable enough to me.

Attribution would have been good, but as the PC says:

‘In the past, newspaper columns have quoted from “another newspaper” or “another magazine” without naming competitors or providing their contact address.’

Report this comment

15
johnboy 3:20 pm
13 Feb 07
#

One thing to mention the story had broken “in another newspaper” (albeit ungracious and rude), It seems another to quote without attribution.

Report this comment

1 2 3

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site