Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Mindless educators and No Hat No Play

By longshanks - 28 May 2012 53

Let me say up front that I’m a believer in public education, and I reckon that most (although not all) teachers in public schools do a great job.

However, I’m a bit sick of the whole “No Hat, No Play” policy that ACT public schools subscribe to. Don’t get me wrong – in the middle of summer it’s important to ensure that kids are protected. But at this time of year? Come on. One day last week one of my kids was told by a teacher that he couldn’t play outside at morning tea because he didn’t have his hat. Apparently the only months where it’s safe for kids to play outside without a hat are June and July.

Obviously, most teachers are sensible about this sort of thing. But I find it concerning that some teachers are so lacking in common sense as to prevent a hatless child from playing outside for 20 minutes in late May. And at 10.30 in the morning to boot!

I’d be interested to know if this is just a public school thing, or whether independent schools have the same approach, i.e. compulsory hat-wearing all year except June and July.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
53 Responses to
Mindless educators and No Hat No Play
1
jessieduck 3:06 pm
28 May 12
#

I feel sorry for your kids teacher. They are not a mindless educator, they were enforcing an excellent policy. Kids have to learn to follow rules or deal with the consequences. If they left their hat at home, they have to play inside.

Suck it up and treat teachers with respect.

Report this comment

2
dvaey 3:07 pm
28 May 12
#

OP: Obviously, most teachers are sensible about this sort of thing.

Unfortunately, some parents arent sensible and are sue happy, and they ruin it for everyone else.

Report this comment

3
Madam Cholet 3:24 pm
28 May 12
#

Master Cholet goes to an excellent child care facility and they do enforce a hat rule through the summer months. I am always surprised however how soon they are asking for us to put winter hats in their bags – probably the end of April. I think it’s still a bit warm for a winter hat then, and still continue to put his summer hat in with said winter hat so they can make a choice. More often than not there are no hats on – kids just being kids and taking them off, not lack of enforcement.

At this time of year, I’m not bothered if he doesn’t have a hat on at that time in the morning though. I note that the Sunsmart website says from Spet through to April is when protection is required. So I’m with you OP. Our excellent child care facility is also a sunsmart centre.

Report this comment

4
DeskMonkey 3:31 pm
28 May 12
#

Read this: http://www.cancer.org.au/Healthprofessionals/patientfactsheets/Lifestyle/Be_sunsmart.htm
Realise that the UV radiation is there even on a winter day. (Extra care should be taken between 10am and 3pm when UV levels reach their peak.)
If you feel like it every morning before sending your children to school check the UV index for the day http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/charts/UV.shtml
Be glad that the teacher is enforcing a school policy that protects your child.
Find something else to whinge about – how about the lack of authority teachers now have to reinforce these rules thanks to parents whinging about silly things

Report this comment

5
neanderthalsis 3:32 pm
28 May 12
#

As someone in their early 30’s who has had a number of skin cancers removed/treated, I fully support the mindless educators that are trying to enforce sound habits to prevent future health issues for your children. Even in winter the sun can cause skin damage.

As previously stated, suck it up and make your kid wear a hat.

Report this comment

6
longshanks 3:46 pm
28 May 12
#

jessieduck said :

I feel sorry for your kids teacher. They are not a mindless educator, they were enforcing an excellent policy. Kids have to learn to follow rules or deal with the consequences. If they left their hat at home, they have to play inside.

Suck it up and treat teachers with respect.

Just about everyone (Cancer Council, medical professionals) agree that people need protection when the UV index is 3 or higher. There is also a growing recognition that due to the effectiveness of the various Sun Smart campaigns over the years, Vitamin D deficiency in children is increasing.

Please explain to me what is excellent about a policy which prevents children from gaining the benefit of exposure to the sun at a time when there is absolutely no risk of damage to the skin? After all, at the moment the maximum daily UV index is 2, so at 10.30am it’s even lower than that.

I do my best to treat everyone with respect – including teachers. However, this is not about “follow the rules or deal with the consequences”. This is about one teacher blindly enforcing a rule without any room for science or common sense, or any regard for what is best for the child.

Don’t feel sorry for the teacher – feel sorry for the pupils.

Report this comment

7
jessieduck 3:53 pm
28 May 12
#

No, you lost me when you called them a mindless educator. It’s a policy that offers the broadest scope of protecting your child and gives them good habits.

Report this comment

8
eily 3:59 pm
28 May 12
#

Or maybe the teacher’s afraid that he might OD on vitamin D, seeing as 15 minutes of sunlight is supposed to get you your RDI.

When you consider how many people are not getting enough vitamin D and risk getting osteoporosis when they’re older, (and its not just an old persons problem nowadays) robbing them of their mobility.

Chance a spot that might turn nasty against bones that brake easily.

Not that I would wish cancer on anyone but the idea of spending the last years of my life in a wheel-chair or bed ridden, costing the health system thousands, not being able to do anything…brrr.

Report this comment

9
poetix 4:04 pm
28 May 12
#

My daughter’s school (non-government) has hats off at this time of year, except for the more formal hat on the way to and from school. Sun hats are only worn in terms 1 and 4.

This seems sensible to me.

Report this comment

10
longshanks 4:09 pm
28 May 12
#

jessieduck said :

No, you lost me when you called them a mindless educator. It’s a policy that offers the broadest scope of protecting your child and gives them good habits.

OK, I acknowledge that “mindless educator” was not a good choice of words. I just find it disappointing that a teacher would not be willing to apply a bit of common sense in this instance.

As far as the policy itself is concerned, the policy it is both good and important from September to April (the months highlighted by the Cancer Council), I do not see how it is valuable from May to August, when kids are already exposing less skin to the sun due to the colder weather.

Report this comment

11
Erg0 4:20 pm
28 May 12
#

longshanks said :

OK, I acknowledge that “mindless educator” was not a good choice of words. I just find it disappointing that a teacher would not be willing to apply a bit of common sense in this instance.

I’m sure the teacher finds it disappointing that you didn’t pack your kid’s hat. They probably also find it disappointing that you’ve appointed yourself the sole arbiter of “common sense”.

Erg0 said :

As far as the policy itself is concerned, the policy it is both good and important from September to April (the months highlighted by the Cancer Council), I do not see how it is valuable from May to August, when kids are already exposing less skin to the sun due to the colder weather.

Well, there’s your answer – find out who sets the policy and complain to them.

Report this comment

12
vg 4:35 pm
28 May 12
#

Give your kid a hat they have in their bag every day of the school year and stop your whining.

Teacher applies your version of common sense and someone as equally whiny as you complains about it

Report this comment

13
Lazy I 4:40 pm
28 May 12
#

“Mindless parent tells teachers how to do their job… again”

Report this comment

14
screaming banshee 4:45 pm
28 May 12
#

longshanks said :

OK, I acknowledge that “mindless educator” was not a good choice of words. I just find it disappointing that a teacher would not be willing to apply a bit of common sense in this instance.

So because you/your child forget to take a hat, you find it disappointing when it is a known requirement for playing outside that this rule is enforced and you/your child must learn to abide by societies rules in order to be able to do the fun things.

Is it also disappointing when you get pulled up for forgetting not to drive after 12 beers….12 beers being the fun, not driving being the hat

Is it also disappointing when you get a ticket for parking in a 2hr park for more than two hour….Driving to work in a nice warm car being the fun, not parking all day in a 2hr spot being the hat

Report this comment

15
trevar 4:52 pm
28 May 12
#

I used to work at a non-government school and we were required to enforce a no hat no play rule year-round (there was no exception in June and July), so it’s not exclusive to public schools. I didn’t have a problem with this, but I did feel like a bit of a goose trying to enforce it on young people with higher levels of melanin in their dermis.

One group of particularly adamant melanin-blessed students were so vocal that I adjusted a persuasive writing assignment so they could give a presentation to the school board in an attempt to have the rule waived for students who were blessed with lots of melanin. They performed very well, and presented a very balanced argument based on the reduced risk of skin cancer for people of their skin colour, but the board (understandably) denied their request on the basis that it looked too much like setting a rule based on race.

We had a lot of fun trying, though.

Report this comment

1 2 3 4

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site