Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Sponsored by Ray White Tuggeranong - fresh, fun & professional approach to real estate

Rental free rooms in exchange for sex?

By OzChick - 16 February 2009 103

[First filed: February 16, 2009 @ 09:40]

I came across this (http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,27753,25056894-5013951,00.html) article which reports that there have been ads listed for rent free properties in exchange for a relationship and/or sex.

It stated, “A similar ad on flatmates.com.au read: “$0 to share flat, wanted flatmate/girlfriend to share unit in Griffith, ACT.”

Is this the result of the rental crisis or is this another avenue of singles to hook up?? Desperate times calling for desperate measures?

UPDATED: Many thanks to poptop for finding us Greg of Ragless Circuit in Kambah.

Greg is a 49 year old who would like to offer a 16-99 year old non-smoker a cash-free room:

    Free accomodation in exchange for some regular intimate contact. Own room and bathroom and use of all facilities

ANOTHER UPDATE: Thanks to the miracle of Google’s Street View we can tour Ragless Circuit from our desktops and try to guess which house is Greg’s!


View Larger Map

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
103 Responses to
Rental free rooms in exchange for sex?
1
Skidbladnir 9:57 am
16 Feb 09
#

‘Young female flatmate wanted: Inner city apartment, $0pw rental, conditions apply’ show up occasionally on Craigslist.

Personally, I find them sexist.

Report this comment

2
VYBerlinaV8_the_one_ 10:00 am
16 Feb 09
#

Noone seems to be forcing anyone to do anything they don’t want…

Report this comment

3
jakez 10:07 am
16 Feb 09
#

Love and shelter are beautiful things.

Report this comment

4
p1 10:14 am
16 Feb 09
#

Personally, I find them sexist.

Abusive and wrong I understand, but sexist? I personally find females attractive, but not men. Does that make me sexist?

Report this comment

5
TheScientist 10:14 am
16 Feb 09
#

Skidbladnir said :

‘Young female flatmate wanted: Inner city apartment, $0pw rental, conditions apply’ show up occasionally on Craigslist.

Personally, I find them sexist.

how can you find that sexist? if someone advertised it with “young male flatmate wanted” would you still find it sexist.

that’s about the most thin skinned comment i’ve ever seen.

everybody has a sexual preference, i’m sure that includes you, and nobody is legally required to conform to anybody elses sexual preference, at least not to my knowledge in Australia.

if you’re trolling, then well done.

Report this comment

6
Pommy bastard 10:20 am
16 Feb 09
#

It would seem that any mentio0n of sex or sexuality gets branded “sexist” these days..

Report this comment

7
dexi 10:28 am
16 Feb 09
#

Only sexist people get branded sexist. I would believe its been levelled at you quite often PB.

Its probably not sexist to list a preference. But what it may be is abusive. Luring a young girl to a flat with the intention of holding power over her. It would be the young girls who are already vulnerable, who are more likely to answer this add.

It also could be a form of prostitution and thus taxable.

Report this comment

8
p1 10:28 am
16 Feb 09
#

I like sex. And I saw a duck once.

Report this comment

9
p1 10:31 am
16 Feb 09
#

It also could be a form of prostitution and thus taxable.

Guess how you structured it. Could be FBT would be payable on the free accommodation.

Report this comment

10
Skidbladnir 10:32 am
16 Feb 09
#

TheScientist said :

if you’re trolling, then well done.

Thankyou, thankyou.
I’ll be here all week.

Report this comment

11
Pommy bastard 10:33 am
16 Feb 09
#

dexi said :

Only sexist people get branded sexist.

Really Dexi? I awiat your proof of that with bated breath.

Pommy bastard said :

I would believe its been levelled at you quite often PB.

Which just disproved your first point.

Pommy bastard said :

Its probably not sexist to list a preference. But what it may be is abusive.

Offering accommodation for sex couldn’t be anything other than abusive surely?

Pommy bastard said :

Luring a young girl to a flat with the intention of holding power over her. It would be the young girls who are already vulnerable, who are more likely to answer this add.

Obviously.

Pommy bastard said :

It also could be a form of prostitution and thus taxable.

Would that make it right?

Report this comment

12
Inappropriate 10:34 am
16 Feb 09
#

Frankly I think the sort of people willing to accept this offer are the sort of people willing to rob you blind when you’re not home.

Report this comment

13
Clown Killer 10:41 am
16 Feb 09
#

Frankly I think the sort of people willing to accept this offer are the sort of people willing to rob you blind when you’re not home.

That’s why you would need to keep them locked under the stairs when you weren’t home.

Report this comment

14
Pommy bastard 10:43 am
16 Feb 09
#

If a young woman already worked in the sex industry, this could be a way of reducing her living expenses.

Report this comment

15
dexi 10:45 am
16 Feb 09
#

If you are a young girl and you are considering answering this add you might like to know your full entitlements.

Sex can be billed at $250 (Minimum) an hour, contact time. That would mean that for 2 hours a week of sex, you should have full use of the flat minus him.

The girlfriend experience is far more expensive and would include lifes luxuries. Car, phones, computers, foxtel, jewlrey, regular entertainment, food and wads of cash when asked for. This still does not include full contact and should be negotiated for 5 days a week (maximum).

Don’t sell your self short. Don’t settle for cheap stuff.

Report this comment

1 2 3 7

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site