"History will be kind to us, because we will write it"
Someone going to some lengths to stay anomymous has pointed at us the Canberra Times reporting on the “pitch perfect” entries to the Canberra Marketing Forum.
In further proof that the Canberra Times is lame we can show all three with a NSFW warning on Gray’s entry.
And so we have from Gray (NSFW remember) The Greens:
ZOO’s pitch for the Liberals:
And this from Adcorp for Labor:
So which one did you like the best?
Loading ... Loading ...
Can’t vote! The whole voting area seems to be hyperlinked to the CT link.
I liked Gray’s best anyway.
So ads #1 (Gray/Greens) and 2 (Zoo/Lib) tell me The Greens are the team to beat. Ad #3 (Adcorp/Lab) is a plum served in a gentleman’s hat (i.e. bonkers).
Very poor efforts all-round. 100% smear/smarm, 0% policy. I would not engage any of these agencies if I were involves (but the faux Jim Henson’s pretty convincing).
it’s The Greens for a start.
What is a folding green? I’m lost.
cant vote either – ZOO is the cleverest in my view (if i understood what a folding green was) but none of them are truly excellent. back to the drawing board i say.
I think they were supposed to be funny rather than policy statements
fixed now. go for it guys.
jdazzle said :
It’s usually a euphemism for money, but I haven’t re-watched the ad to check if that meaning would be appropriate in the context.
rosscoact said :
noooooo. as if they are policy statements???
bikhet said :
i thought it might be golfing talk
jdazzle said :
Please refer to post number 2
All of the ads are lame – just like the three products on offer.
Embarrassing.
Those were absolutely hopeless.
You forgot one Johnboy. There should be a radio button for “Can’t decide, they are all lame.”
I mean seriously, this is teh best people can come up with?????
I can’t find any site taking bets on the ACT election (or even giving odds for that matter)… Anyone know?
First two were pretty funny, last one seemed kind of pointless.