Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Politics

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Tralee fight and the second Sydney airport

By caf - 2 October 2007 17

Last week Ben Sandilands had a mildy interesting article in Crikey (subscription required) linking the long-running puch-up over the Tralee development to the even older and more bitter intrigues surrounding Sydney’s proposed second airport. Ben picks up on a theme that’s been mentioned by contributors here before – that of Terry Snow’s ultimate ambition being for Canberra Airport to take on the second airport role:

The extent of Snow’s ambitions have come to light in the complex and incomplete litigation between him and Sartor over noise projections and planning powers. Canberra Airport has projected that within about 10 years it will handle, between 7am and 7pm, a total of 76 takeoffs or landings by wide body jets with 250 seats or more, at least half of them in jets as big or long as any currently in service.

Including day time flights, it will average 32 movements an hour, and without a curfew, have the potential to grow to more than half Sydney’s frequency of services which is capped at 80 flights an hour between 6am and 11pm.

Clearly, the passengers to fill them aren’t going to come exclusively from Canberra’s one third of a million residents but Sydney’s 4 million.

Already there is only an extra 30 minutes drive time from south-western Sydney to Canberra Airport compared to the usual grid lock and the poisonous fumes of the M5 East tunnel that gets between much of the metropolitan sprawl and Kingsford Smith Airport.

However Sandilands never explains why Frank Sartor (NSW Planning Minister) is so opposed to this eventuality? Surely this would be a politically convenient outcome for all concerned, neatly avoiding anyone actually having to build Badgery’s Creek (which appears to be considered a bit too “courageous” in the Sir Humphrey sense).

It also seems likely to me that the bulk of the load-shifting to Canberra International would be freight rather than passengers, but that’s a side issue.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
17 Responses to
Tralee fight and the second Sydney airport
1
ant 9:24 pm
02 Oct 07
#

Be vigilant. There’s a new proposal for a fast train link between the airport and Sydney. Guess what that’ll mean? Jumbos from Singapore at 2am.

But they don’t really need the train. Land the jumbos, process the passengers (customs, immigration) and then load them into planes taking them to their final destinations. Capital cities, sunny places, regions. All taking off from Canberra airport, which lacks a curfew.

Once it’s happening, it won’t be stoppable. Take an interest *now*.

Report this comment

2
Pandy 10:57 pm
02 Oct 07
#

I think 24 hour plane operations are good. It will stop Tralee dead.

As for a VFT, I think it is a great idea. But ant I would tell ’em: “Bud, you are dreaming if you think VFT will happen. Light rail will happen 1st”.

Report this comment

3
ant 11:55 pm
02 Oct 07
#

They’re not dreaming. If they finance a lot of it, and get some strategic partners to chip in, it will happen soon. Once that rail link is in, enjoy the aeroplanes. they won’t just come in on one line. Why do you think they’re fighting Tralee so aggressively?

Report this comment

4
Pandy 12:10 am
03 Oct 07
#

So Tom Snow may finance the VFT? Interesting.

The VFT was investigate years ago. The Government rejected the calls for tax breaks to build it and the proposal collapsed in a heap. It is a multi billion project and more so if they extend it to Melbourne as they must.

But maybe it will happen since there is a growing carbon backlash to aeroplane travel.

What is your source ant? I am interested in following-up the story.

Report this comment

5
ant 12:27 am
03 Oct 07
#

It’ll become public soon enough. the airport has resources where their interests are concerned.

Report this comment

6
shauno 1:34 am
03 Oct 07
#

“Be vigilant. There’s a new proposal for a fast train link between the airport and Sydney. Guess what that’ll mean? Jumbos from Singapore at 2am.”

Thats just fantastic news. I wish Mr Snow all the best and hope to be one of the first passengers to come in from Singapore.

Report this comment

7
sepi 10:12 am
03 Oct 07
#

I’m with ant.

This is one of those things that people will bitterly regret once it starts happening. People in Sydney are pretty unimpressed with aircraft noise, and that’s got a curfew.

Much like the parking in Civic that is now big buildings – once this is done it won’t be undone.

Report this comment

8
Mr Evil 10:41 am
03 Oct 07
#

I think that even with a VFT type link between Canberra/Sydney the belief that Canberra can become a second airport for Sydney is fairly far fetched. And even if it did happen, there’d be very little benefit for Canberra (apart from Snow City!) as most of the passengers would be stepping off the plane at Canberra directly onto the next train to Sydney.

Plus, how much do you think the train fare would be????

Somewhere around Goulburn would be a much more likely option for Sydney’s second airport.

Report this comment

9
Ralph 10:46 am
03 Oct 07
#

Does anybody know how far second and third airports are for other major cities around the world?

A second Sydney airport some 200km or more from Sydney is just ridiculous.

Report this comment

10
caf 11:04 am
03 Oct 07
#

mr evil: presumably they’d need to locally employ a large number of people to service, clean, fuel and turnaround the aircraft, not to mention process the passengers.

Report this comment

11
Mr Evil 11:11 am
03 Oct 07
#

Caf, not at all – they’ll use robots to do all that! :)

(Okay, I hadn’t thought about that little thing of extra employment for Canberrans!)

Report this comment

12
bonfire 11:35 am
03 Oct 07
#

fast train from sydney to goulburn area airport – same model as heathrow – london.

better than current sydney airport problems.

getting off a jumbo at 7am the same time as 5 others touchdown (within minutes of each other) makes it a drag to catch connecting flights as you crawl through customs.

there has to be a better way.

Report this comment

13
Maelinar 11:37 am
03 Oct 07
#

Offshore. Next problem.

Report this comment

14
Thumper 11:47 am
03 Oct 07
#

Heathrow to London is not fast.

It’s just a standard overlander.

Better than a taxi though…

Report this comment

15
Thumper 11:48 am
03 Oct 07
#

Sorry, mean to say it’s an tube train that goes overland, rather than underground.

If that makes sense :)

Report this comment

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site