Just read that his worship Higgins has provided bail to serial car thief, drug user teen for the second time. The fact that he while on bail and i assume disqualified from driving, ran a red light mounted the traffic island and crashed into an innocent punter, sorry allegedly, would i think show that he does not care for the previous requirements of his bail.
Higgins reckons the central question is “how can his behaviour be managed so that he doesn’t create a danger to others?”
Justice Penfold then ups the ante finding no guilt for a bloke who in Decemeber 2010 stabs another after been thrown out of a club, picking a fight and then getting stabby. The Palmer said he accidently stabbed him. I would have thought all this could be avoided if he had not had the knife in his hand when threatening someone. I also wonder how the learned Judge hypothesised it was an accident, a 20 cm gash from front to back of his assailent.
No wonder their is a backlog in the Supreme Court, they are busy thinking of ways to set new precedents and create a legacy because surely their are no previous cases like these decisions