Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

Canberrans can’t drive – episode 117

By maps00454 15 September 2009 93

Hi new to the RiotACT,  now not a cranky person at all but had an interesting woman today coming down Adelaide Ave.

As this woman knows so well and stated at the lights to the hospital for me in a heated exchange “IT’S MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL IN THE RIGHT LANE” as she had done all the way from the lodge.  This is a 35-50 yr old woman and I’m being quite considerate saying the start age of 35, would you not think from all the publicity surrounding the ever changing road rules and general anger from other motorist’s from people who can’t understand “KEEP LEFT UNLESS OVERTAKING IN AN 80 KPH ZONE DUAL CARRIAGE LANES”.

I only wish this woman had enough sense to keep herself informed of current road rules.  I must say not being from the ACT and traveling quite extensively in Australia it seems many long time residents of Canberra believe this form of disregard of road rules to be a natural born right. Guess what it’s not.
If you see her rego number can’t say it all except that it’s a little white 2 door hatch with “yes” as the first letters of the plate give her a toot if she still hasn’t learned!!!!!!

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
93 Responses to
Canberrans can’t drive – episode 117
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
5
gazket 5:09 pm 29 Jan 14

welcome to Canberra …home of the ignoramus middle aged women

rhino 2:14 pm 29 Jan 14

I frankly find it annoying when people lack common courtesy and their argument is that they are legally allowed to be discourteous. I may be legally allowed to call someone a C-word but that doesn’t make it the right thing to do. If it isn’t the right thing to do then it’s the wrong thing to do. So therefore it was the wrong thing to do. Pretty obvious when applying common sense or common courtesy as others have said.

farq 12:56 am 29 Jan 14

Somethings never change…..

The-Riotact will be missed.

sloppery 11:55 am 10 Feb 10

Ryano said :

Only in Canberra would an item like this be brought down to the letter of the law.

If someone was behind me, and I was going below the speed limit in the right-hand lane, I’d move left. He/she might be in a hurry, have kids alone, need to go to hospital, etc.

It’s common courtesy, not to mention common sense.

At least someone here has a clue. +1

YourWelcome 11:05 am 10 Feb 10

Puh-lease. Simply a matter of common courtesy. I get frustrated with people all the time who hang in the right lane going considerably slower than the designated speed limit. Behind me there will be a long line of other frustrated drivers. In the left lane, banked up traffic. Much (in my view) of the traffic hassles in Canberra could be avoided if 1) people stayed in the left lane unless overtaking and 2)if Canberra drivers weren’t such nervous drivers.

Ryano 9:14 pm 27 Sep 09

Only in Canberra would an item like this be brought down to the letter of the law.

If someone was behind me, and I was going below the speed limit in the right-hand lane, I’d move left. He/she might be in a hurry, have kids alone, need to go to hospital, etc.

It’s common courtesy, not to mention common sense.

hurr 12:48 pm 27 Sep 09

I’m of the opinion of a few others here, I’ll keep to the right hand lane where legally allowed to do so if I’m going to be turning right soon. Especially when busy because some people have shown that they’re not courteous enough to allow me to merge into the right hand lane from the left when my turn off is coming up. I’m also willing to bet that the people responsible for behaviour like that are people like the Speedy Gonzales OP who would probably laugh off another driver’s attempts to get from A to B if it interferes with his big headed “must speed” attitude.

Too much road rage from people. Perhaps we should have mandatory anger tests with licensing. Those who show too much anger aren’t eligible for a licence. Raging will only make some people more cautious and uncertain. If you’re cautious or uncertain on a road, the first thing you do is reduce your speed.

astrojax 9:20 pm 17 Sep 09

berra j – the same folk what teach folk to indicate left when they merge when two lanes merge into one with a ‘lane one form’ sign painted on… crazy in the brain.

usually same drivers who didn’t indicate when they actually turned onto the road or changed lanes across the unbroken lane line a bit before it… or the ones who turn right from the right lane of a two lane road into the far left lane of the two lane road into which they are turning [the roundabout near the war memorial, with its unbroken lane line at the the top of anzac is a classic example] or drive through ‘stop’ signs just to get into a gap they’d otherwise miss – aww diddums… ; )

RatsNest 12:51 pm 17 Sep 09

Special G said :

Berra J – read the road rules – technically correct.

BerraJ said :

And can I just ask WHO THE HELL IS TEACHING DRIVERS TO INDICATE RIGHT WHEN GOING STRAIGHT ON A ROUNDABOUT!! I have seen it and almost crashed because of it at least a dozen times.

IIRC (this was in NSW not sure if ACT was the same) when the rule to indicate off the roundabout came into effect it did have a clause about indicating to the right. This lasted about 4-5 weeks then the rule was revised to ‘only indicate off the roundabout’ probably due to the number of fenderbenders the confusion caused.

BerraJ 11:21 am 17 Sep 09

Thoroughly Smashed said :

swissbignose said :

Are you sure about that, Special G?

One is supposed to indicate *left* when exiting a roundabout (including going straight), but I’ve never heard of indicating right to go straight.

I see people doing it and still haven’t worked out where they got the idea that it’s necessary.
 

Special G said :

Berra J – read the road rules – technically correct.

BerraJ said :

And can I just ask WHO THE HELL IS TEACHING DRIVERS TO INDICATE RIGHT WHEN GOING STRAIGHT ON A ROUNDABOUT!! I have seen it and almost crashed because of it at least a dozen times.

From the Australian Road Rules:

113 Giving a right change of direction signal when entering a roundabout
(1) This rule applies to a driver entering a roundabout if the driver is to leave the roundabout more than halfway around it.

From the ACT Road Rules Handbook:

In simple terms: When approaching a multi-lane roundabout with the intention of continuing straight ahead, approach in either the left or right hand lane (Example 2 refers) and operate the left hand indicator after entering the roundabout and continue to indicate throughout the turn.

So, what “road rules” are you reading?

I too would like to know what ‘road rules’ Special G is reading.

Thoroughly Smashed 10:02 am 17 Sep 09

swissbignose said :

Are you sure about that, Special G?

One is supposed to indicate *left* when exiting a roundabout (including going straight), but I’ve never heard of indicating right to go straight.

I see people doing it and still haven’t worked out where they got the idea that it’s necessary.
 

Special G said :

Berra J – read the road rules – technically correct.

BerraJ said :

And can I just ask WHO THE HELL IS TEACHING DRIVERS TO INDICATE RIGHT WHEN GOING STRAIGHT ON A ROUNDABOUT!! I have seen it and almost crashed because of it at least a dozen times.

From the Australian Road Rules:

113 Giving a right change of direction signal when entering a roundabout
(1) This rule applies to a driver entering a roundabout if the driver is to leave the roundabout more than halfway around it.

From the ACT Road Rules Handbook:

In simple terms: When approaching a multi-lane roundabout with the intention of continuing straight ahead, approach in either the left or right hand lane (Example 2 refers) and operate the left hand indicator after entering the roundabout and continue to indicate throughout the turn.

So, what “road rules” are you reading?

Jim Jones 8:37 am 17 Sep 09

swissbignose said :

Are you sure about that, Special G?

One is supposed to indicate *left* when exiting a roundabout (including going straight), but I’ve never heard of indicating right to go straight.

Pfft. No-one is supposed to ever use their indicators except for the purposes of subversive counterintelligence.

Everyone knows that.

swissbignose 1:58 am 17 Sep 09

Are you sure about that, Special G?

One is supposed to indicate *left* when exiting a roundabout (including going straight), but I’ve never heard of indicating right to go straight.

5

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site