Territory And Municipal Services have posted online their consultant’s report on a review of speed limit signage completed last December.
This survey has identified a total of 164 sites out of a total of around 3300 sites where some changes or augmentation of speed limit signage warrants action to ensure consistency with the relevant Australian Standard.
At a significant proportion of these sites (41%) the appropriate signage has been approved but the approved signage differs from the on site signage due to a range of circumstances including collision removal and vandalism.
Weekly NewsletterEvery Thursday afternoon, we package up the most-read and trending RiotACT stories of the past seven days and deliver straight to your inbox..
This suggests that it would be useful to tighten reporting mechanisms to improve the likelihood of a speed limit sign removed in a motor vehicle collision being reported to the responsible authority to ensure a timely replacement.
At almost half of the total number of locations the inconsistency is that a speed limit sign has been collocated with other signage. Although undesirable based on best practice this deficiency is unlikely to cause confusion regarding the speed limit applying on a particular section of road.
Another category that represents 13% of locations is where repeater signs are desirable more frequently than currently provided.
Congratulations to Sgt.Bungers who’s long war with Roads ACT appears to have been vindicated.