31 July 2024

200 new police officers, new station for Molonglo in Liberals' $60 million community safety package

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
35
AFP officers in Belconnen

Police numbers will receive a significant boost if the Canberra Liberals are elected. Photo: Thomas Lucraft.

Hundreds of new police officers and a standalone police station in the growing Molonglo Valley headline the Canberra Liberals’ $60 million community safety package that also promises a tougher response to violent crime and dangerous driving.

Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee said that if elected on 19 October, the Canberra Liberals would aim to deliver an additional 200 police officers in the next term of government.

Ms Lee said the Canberra Liberals would also commit $5 million for upgrades to the Woden police station, progress options for a new Civic police station, and continue to transition the Gungahlin Joint Emergency Services Centre into a standalone police station.

Staff at both the Civic and Gungahlin premises have had to vacate the buildings this year. The aging Civic headquarters suffered water damage, and the Gungahlin centre suffered lead and diesel contamination.

READ ALSO ‘Neglected and taken for granted’: Community sector launches campaign for more government funding

Police spokesperson James Milligan said the ACT had the lowest number of police per capita in the country and an extra 200 police officers would bring the ACT in line with NSW.

“Whilst the Labor-Greens government continues to neglect our frontline police officers, the Canberra Liberals understand the basic needs for the safety of our community and have long fought for more police officers in the ACT, along with providing the resources they need,” Mr Milligan said.

“This announcement is about not only supporting our police officers but ensuring the safety of all Canberrans.”

In a get-tough-on-crime approach, Ms Lee also announced a range of changes to the judicial system to “bring it into line with community expectations”.

These are in response to community concerns about attacks on frontline workers, offences committed while on bail, dangerous driving, random assaults and knife attacks.

The Liberals would legislate to remove the presumption of bail for offenders who assault frontline workers and establish a standalone offence for breach of bail.

They would also introduce electronic monitoring of serious offenders on bail through the use of ankle bracelets.

A crackdown on dangerous driving would include tougher penalties for culpable driving, which at present attracts a maximum sentence of 10 years in jail.

There would also be tougher penalties for ‘coward punch’ attacks by introducing a standalone criminal offence.

A Liberal Government would give police powers to scan people with metal-detecting wands to detect knives and issue penalties in a bid to reduce serious knife crimes.

This would follow the lead of Jack’s Law in Queensland, named after 17-year-old Jack Beasley who was stabbed to death in 2019.

READ ALSO Light rail is safe but this is what could make it even safer, says study

Ms Lee said a Canberra Liberals Government would re-prioritise community safety by boosting police numbers, building a more robust justice system, and bringing ACT laws back into line with community expectations.

“Every Canberran deserves to feel safe whether they are out in the community or in their own home,” Ms Lee said.

She accused Labor and the Greens of eroding public confidence in the justice system.

Ms Lee said this comprehensive suite of initiatives would restore confidence and trust in the justice system.

Shadow Attorney-General Peter Cain said the package re-aligned the justice system with community expectations by cracking down on dangerous driving, introducing tougher sentencing measures and strengthening bail laws to protect frontline workers and help prevent repeat crime,” Mr Cain said.

“The Canberra Liberals are sending a clear message: we will build a stronger justice system to make our city safer for all,” he said.

Join the conversation

35
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Ross of Canberra6:48 pm 09 Aug 24

Let’s get our own police and forget this AFP rent-a-cop. Let’s have more effective policing without more police.

Labor and Liberals both promising more police, if it’s bipartisan just get on with it.
These fake displays of support and chest beating for our police service.
If both parties cared they’d be paid what they deserve and there would be a wait list to join like there once was. No one in heir right mind would join up today and work shifts for that sort of cash. If the support is genuine make it happen today!

Incidental Tourist1:53 pm 05 Aug 24

Yes, definitely we need more Police officers to address serious crime, but obviously we don’t need revenue raisers issuing tickets for minor driving offences. Also police officers should be paid fairly given the risk and stress of their daily job.

It’s pretty clear by now that law and order are not a priority for Labor and the Greens. Neither is the health system with backlogs for medical procedures, some of which (diagnostic) could be life saving. Instead they seem to have other priorities eg climate change and the tram. It’s time Labor and the Greens were sent packing.

Instead of electronic monitoring of “serious” offenders on bail, why not just not give them bail? Easy. Problem solved.

HiddenDragon7:30 pm 01 Aug 24

Sounds like a better use of $60m. than many of the things which the current government would do with that sum of money, but if part of this is a cunning plan to offset some/all of the extra spending by defining “dangerous driving” to include minor infringements of arbitrary road rules and greatly increase the policing of those rules that would also likely be a very good way of ensuring that an ACT Liberal government was a one term government.

Pay the police what their worth, it’s crazy the AFP are the lowest paid in Australia.

Patiently waiting for the ACT Labor social media team to send Jack D a response to copy and paste for this. 🤣

I am underwhelmed but not surprised by this policy announcement from the Canberra Liberals. What would one expect from the most socially conservative branch of the party in Australia. Elizabeth Lee’s shameless support in bringing this policy reveals who is really in charge in the party and her lack of authority. It also reveals yet again how low she is prepared to stoop to appease her party’s dominant right.

This supposedly new and reformed party in trying to appeal to the country’s most progressive and educated electorate is trotting out the same tough on crime policies they bring to every election. Jack’s Law was recently debated in the Assembly and is an attempt by the Liberals to give the police more powers to target and search individuals without grounds or reasonable suspicion. ACT voters need to be forever vigilant of this party and their attempts to introduce laws which restrict our liberties and hard-won rights, including their watering down of the ACT’s Human Rights Act.

Many in the party and current candidates are closely associated with religious and far-right fringe groups including Right to Life and Advance. The party’s conservative voting record is testament to what they have planned should they ever win government in the ACT. The party has vociferously opposed the Voice referendum, drug reforms, women’s rights and voluntary assisted dying laws just to name a few.

I am not surprised at your enthusiasm for this policy judging by your extreme and regular contributions to this site Ken M. Many of your comments are typical of what can be found on the Young Liberals Facebook site.

Took a while for the media team to come up with this rambling nonsense, Jack. 🤣

Gregg Heldon9:17 am 06 Aug 24

Ah Jack, we are all underwhelmed and unsurprised by your response. After all, you are anti Police and Policing and anti Elizabeth Lee. But you’ve also shown yourself to be anti women, with your spray of spittle and dribble directed towards all female Liberal MLAs. And you also conveniently forget that half the Liberal MLAs voted for the Voice. Of course that doesn’t fit your narrative, as dictated to you by Barr and your CMFEU overlords, themselves as anti Police as you are. What a coincidence! A corrupt organisation just as extreme view wise, as extreme far right groups. Two sides of the same coin. But you already knew that, didn’t you Jack. You just choose to ignore it.
Keep talking Jack. Your obvious double standards and hypocrisy will turn off any swinging voters towards to Labor/Greens coalition here in the ACT.

I am a robust feminist Gregg Heldon surrounded by smart and marvellous women. I am also a strong advocate for the CFMEU and other unions around Canberra and will continue to do so into the future, proudly supporting their vigorous activism for worker’s and women’s rights and safety. Labor and its unions lead the way in striving for equality and representation of women. The ALP introduced quotas for winnable seats 30 years ago at its 1994 National conference, establishing many of the reforms that continue to drive gender equality in the party with Senator Katy Gallagher and Alicia Payne sitting in our parliament today.

Women inside the Liberal party, a party you support, continue to be subjected to ridicule for raising gender equality concerns. At a recent AGM the party’s women, silenced for too long, were shouted down for raising the issue of equality. The sexual assault, harassment and bullying claims made during the term of the last LNP government continue to be played out in our courts today. A record number of women were elected to the lower house at the last federal election but Liberal party women shamefully have just 9 of its 42 seats.

Despite your false assertions I am not anti-police. I support the Territory having its own police force with ministerial and Integrity Commission oversight which it is currently exempted from. This follows criticism from government and leading members of the legal fraternity, questioning the ethical standards of some of our police and its leadership including a lack of knowledge and training, entrenched sexism and bullying, failing victims of sexual assault and rewarding of bad behaviour, to name a few.

The Canberra Liberals used the party’s platform in the campaign against the Voice referendum, all supported by its leadership team and funding from Advance!

Gregg Heldon1:31 pm 06 Aug 24

Well Jack, you just keep supporting that corrupt organisation, the CMFEU and, by close association, the ACT Labor party. Your happy to do so.
I prefer my politics less corrupted and bullying.
And yes, you are anti Police. Your previous response to refusing to pull over for emergency services on Limestone Ave proved that. Either that, or your massively entitled.
The AFP and ACT Policing isn’t perfect, but what organisation is. I am proud to say that I worked on both sides for 13 1/2 years doing, among other duties, handling 000 calls and viewing Child Exploitation Material. All as an unsworn officer. I know I saved lives and make lives better. Every one, I’m sure, feels the same way.

I admire your tenacity and commitment Gregg Heldon. The ACT Police come under federal jurisdiction and are immune from ministerial and Integrity Commission investigations. I will continue my efforts in advocating for an independent ACT police force which represents Canberrans and our city’s best interests. One journalist recently described our force as a cancer on society, posing the question on whether they are the most corrupt in the country.

Negative press and ongoing criticism from the courts, legal profession and government are all part and parcel of policing in the ACT, questioning the ethics and moral standards of senior police officers and the force’s leadership. Recent criticisms have included heavy handed and aggressive tactics when making arrests, police lying under cross-examination, carrying out fishing expeditions when accessing personal information, leaking of a complainants personal and confidential information to the press in a high-profile rape case and a lack of transparency in investigations. There are a number of long running and high profile internal police investigations underway with their outcomes unlikely to ever be released.

I am looking forward to our government tearing up its contract with the AFP and employing our own force answerable to our city and its citizens.

Gregg Heldon8:48 am 07 Aug 24

All first responders agencies should have a mirror held up to them and be asked if they can do better. It’s only right. As should all Government departments at all levels. And any bad apples should be removed. And we have seen this happen in the past and no doubt, will do in the future. It’s the right thing to do.
I also noticed in another article here on Riotact where you castigate three Green Female MLAs. It’s a strange form of misogyny Jack, having a go, mostly at all female MLAs that aren’t Labor. Although I do agree about Emma Davidson, she is particularly useless, especially as Mental Health Minister. Her performance in that portfolio is nothing short of invisible.

Political debate is healthy in any democracy Gregg Heldon. Any criticisms I have made in these discussions are made within the boundaries of proper debate. My opinions have been directed at parliamentarians, both male and female from all sides of government. This has included Emma Davidson who I am disappointed in as Human Rights Minister. I would never, nor would I ever call her or anyone else “useless” which you have been given space to do. She is not!

I am well aware of the good work Emma Davidson has performed both in government and prior to her entering politics. This has included her leading and strong advocacy work for families, women and the disadvantaged.

Are there police in Canberra?! Never see them. And when you want to report a crime like home being burgled you ring a phone number (after being on hold for 30 minutes+ ) and talk to a help desk person who files your troubles away along with the hundreds of others that won’t get any action. Finally the police recently lauded the wonderful Canberrans who submitted their dash cam video to help catch bad drivers. Who knew we are all employees of the ACT Police force. 🤷🏽‍♀️

Excellent.

One question.

What are they cutting to get the money for that?

Seems like a lot of the recent liberal proposals – inspirational but unfunded.

How is Andrew Barr paying for his tram to woden or his new Bruce precinct and new stadium in Bruce or his music pavilion and so called 800 new health workers and Northside hospital?

Why is it when ACT Labor announce a billion dollar spend on something, nobody bothers to ask this question, yet when the Libs announce spending 5 bucks you are all like “OMG they will strip funding from schools and hospitals for this!”?

Two wrongs don’t make a right.

Valid question though, could you ask it on an article about Labor campaign promises?

This one is about the liberals.

Just weird I haven’t seen you pipe up with this question on any of the Labor or greens campaign promises.

@Ken M

You also haven’t seen me piping up on the Labor/green threads accusing you of being biased

I am biased. I don’t pretend otherwise. I’d vote for a dog to govern the ACT before Labor or the greens got my vote.

@Tom Philips
You ask how Andrew Barr will be paying for the light rail. As you should be aware but choose to ignore, contracts for stage 1 and 2A of the project are public and stage 2B will be released when finalised. Negotiations are still in progress for 2B due to the complexity of the project. The project is a small part of our government’s total expenditure, delivered through a public private partnership. The Commonwealth government will also contribute. The existing light rail contract, which includes design, construction and maintenance will be delivered over a period of 20 years. It will cost our government less than 1% of total expenditure, a pittance in comparison to our health and education budgets.

One of the most complicated city changing infrastructure project the ACT government has ever undertaken, the project spans several districts and some of the most valued land in the Territory, including our parliamentary triangle. It will be a transport system designed for our city’s future population and workforce. The route the tram will take is only part of this process with heritage, environmental and ecological assessments, stakeholder and community consultations part of this complicated mix.

What do the Canberra Liberals have to offer? More whingeing from the sidelines and another light rail election. The fourth in 12 years with them yet again offering a bus transport system that can’t even make it over Commonwealth Avenue bridge and on to Woden.

@Jack D.
I swear I could hear the strains of “Hail to the Chief” as I read your post. Penmanship worthy of your party acolyte status.

Jack D,
“It will cost our government less than 1% of total expenditure”

For one public transport route that carries less than 15k passengers per day.

And you think that’s cheap?

It’s a massive impost and future stages as you freely admit are far more complicated and expensive. For a slower and less flexible service than current buses.

It’s the reason why the government has not released any business case or costing for the expansion of the network, because its not remotely viable.

And you want to complain about the Liberals?

Think of all those extra cars that have been taken off the road with those 15,000 passengers travelling along the Gungahlin light rail route every day chewy. What about all of those extra passengers who will be travelling the light rail network into the future with Gungahlin’s growth and the rail’s expansion across our city. A light rail network that is 99.99% on time 7 days a week, safe and comfortable to ride on and popular with those who travel on it.

Not to mention all that extra activity and the scale of development that has taken place along the rail’s corridor.

Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and Adelaide have also seen the benefits of light rail and are expanding their networks across their cities too.

I am just tickled pink with joy! Can’t you be excited and share the joy with me chewy?

Bring on the light rail 🚊👍

Jack,
And yet for all these made up wonders they still can’t write a robust options study or business case for the project.

Funny that.

Almost like your meaningless talking points and emotional based arguments aren’t a substitute for proper infrastructure planning.

Shame you’re too partisan to see beyond your ideological dislike for the opposition to view the issue on its merits.

Dan Rackshack9:25 am 01 Aug 24

These are welcome changes and I look forward to our frontline workers receiving the legislative and resourcing surety they so desperately need and deserve.

The years under Barr has led to lax bail and criminal justice laws that now fail to adequately reflect community needs. Reading the recent horror stories of child abusers and vehicular murderers being released into the community is an utter failure of the system and indictment of this govt.

Well done, Libs! Law and order has been a low priority under Labor/Greens! Very good to see more funding for police officers and police stations, they are so overworked and have been for some time! Tougher penalties for dangerous driving are also a welcome change, no one wants any repeats of the tragedies that have happened on our roads in recent years.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.