1 January 2024

In a city of think tanks, who is thinking about our city?

| Martin Greenwood
Join the conversation
60
National Arboretum

The Centre for a Better Canberra has launched and it wants your feedback on what a better Canberra would look like. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Canberra has moved beyond a tipping point. Since its centenary a decade ago, the sleepy country town vibe has long since been shed.

Rightly, though, we still cling on to the best parts of the country town vibe that makes Canberra unique.

Just look at the joint effort by three former Chief Ministers to get new signs put up in suburbs to tell the stories of the politicians they’re named after.

At the same time as this venture, the ACT moved forward with nation-leading policy reform in drug decriminalisation and building infrastructure at a pace and scale never seen before.

The new bridge over the Molonglo River awarded extra funding recently would rival the biggest infrastructure projects ever built by the ACT Government if it had been built only 15 years ago.

The Canberra of today boasts an economy larger than Tasmania, with a population that is on track to overtake it within our working lives.

READ ALSO 100,000 University of Canberra grads – and just as many chances for change

The public sector makes up a smaller percentage of the ACT’s workforce every year – education, tourism and advanced manufacturing are growing apace.

Canberrans have pride in their city and a growing confidence that, before the centenary, was rare – Canberrans were more likely than anyone to bag out their own city. Now we will argue with an Italian that our region’s Sangiovese is the best in the world.

Canberra has the great benefit of hosting the nation’s key decision-makers and, as a result, is able to attract a range of national thinking bodies either permanently or as regular visitors to our city.

We host peak bodies, trade associations and research institutes, all of which are developing policy and generating new ideas, but collectively, they don’t see Canberra as their home.

So it’s time a city-state of our size and scale had an independent think tank to look ahead at the challenges facing our city and the opportunities for us to do things differently and to do them better.

Canberra is a truly great place but the benefits of Canberra aren’t always felt by everyone and, without constant improvement, we risk missing opportunities and falling behind.

The newly launched Centre for a Better Canberra aims to fill this gap.

READ ALSO New psychosocial hazards regulations – what does your workplace need to know?

The University of Canberra (UC) is Canberra’s university – it always has been.

The core purpose of a university is to create and share knowledge, and UC has for a long time been a partner of many of the existing groups in Canberra working to advocate for a better city from their own perspectives, whether it’s the Canberra Business Chamber, the Tourism Leaders Forum, sports teams, community groups or UC’s own research institutes.

Jan Shaddock, Martin Greenwood, Gonzalo Cubillo De Regoyos

Centre for a Better Canberra Associate Director of Civic Leadership Jan Shaddock, Director Martin Greenwood and Community Engagement Specialist Gonzalo Cubillo De Regoyos. Photo: University of Canberra.

Having the history and depth of relationship with these partners means the Centre for a Better Canberra, as a think tank for Canberra, will be able to draw on their expertise and inputs while being able to keep a whole of community perspective.

Having the backing of UC also gives the Centre the capacity to engage across the full spectrum of policy issues.

If one thing has come through clearly since the Centre’s launch in November, Canberrans want to talk about Planning (with a capital P), and while it is a critical issue, we can’t miss the opportunity to think about what the future of our health system, education, transport, economy, culture and many other things will look like as our city grows and we try to keep the best of Canberra in a changing world.

We’ve got an ambitious agenda, we’re open to your ideas and your feedback and we’d welcome you to sign up and help us as we work on a positive vision for an even better Canberra.

REGION MEDIA PARTNER SUPPLIED CONTENT

Join the conversation

60
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

A nice idea but it’s being led by Chris Steel’s former staffer, so you can guarantee it won’t be an independent think tank – just another ACT Labor mouth piece.

HiddenDragon8:18 pm 02 Jan 24

Around the same time that the Hawke government was developing the model of self government for the ACT, it was pursuing initiatives across a number of portfolios which were informed by the concepts of devolution and regionalisation – both of which featured in the influential (on that government) report and recommendations of the Royal Commission on Australian Government Administration.

Seen in that light, the combining of state and local functions in the form of self government chosen for the ACT could be seen as an experiment, of sorts, which could (if successful) have served as a model for public administration across the country. Some might have seen this as part of a grand plan eventually to outflank and do away with the states but others, more realistically, would have recognised the potential for solutions to at least some of the problems and costs involved in governing a sparsely populated continent as a federation.

The CBC could usefully revisit these issues, particularly from the perspective of identifying solutions of sorts to the inherent problems of governing the ACT – most notably diseconomies of scale, costly duplication of policy and program development work, and a consequent fiscal trajectory which does not make for a pretty picture. Someone with Chris Wallace’s background and connections would be well placed to provide informed, pragmatic leadership to such work.

Taking on big issues such as this would be so much better than succumbing to the obvious temptation of providing a gloss of intellectual respectability for the policies and activities of the ACT government in return for helpful funding.

Ignore the haters on this site. I think it is a terrific idea and i am keen to contribute rather than just whinge.

Our city is NOT in decline and is the centre of a bustling region that has a lot going for it. Whether we grow wines or build satellites, this town is punching above its weight I think we can make it even better.

Stop complaining and start contributing.

Having very actively contributed to town planning through a variety of government initiated think-tanks and committees on social planning, spatial planning etc I quickly saw that this ‘consultation’ was structured to ensure certain issues (like public transport, tree cover, green spaces and public parks) were ignored, whilst others were already determined for each area by those developers, politicians and their public servants who were involved in designing the process and limiting its scope to the issues they wanted to address. I’d like to think this will be different but have become cynical after 20+years of getting involved and contributing.

Elle Cehcker3:43 pm 02 Jan 24

Canberra collapsed after NCDC stopped planning.

It is beyond saving now, especially when the major developers in Canberra are garbage, bar Molonglo and a few others who plan places not slums. No think take can reverse the decline of the “Bush capital”.

mikaloviche13:13 pm 02 Jan 24

Think tank oh dear . just those words make me cringe. oh and by the way Canberra has another university called ANU it was there long before the “Canberra+ one was even dreamt about in a think tank full of academics wondering if the ANU would have to compete for funding. Think ” TANK” think shark tank . Another tank fest . Canberra has some of the brightest minds and imports what it can’t get it’s called poaching and with promises of a house in Aranda close by . Like the three witches from Macbeth something wicked this way comes. Lets see the out put , the report lets see the money spent and the outcomes or if any flow on affect happened . In a bubble within a bubble the Arboretum is an amazing place with new seedlings “from little things big things grow” they say . hopefully the fires thaat went through that area burning down hundreds of houses from the unexpected ferocity and heat generated from the pinas radiatus plantation some one “thinks about tree crops close to a city in the bush capital . I wish they had planted that 60 years ago or more instead i have imagine the old trees that will be wonderful. In the 60’s Douglas fur and cork plantations were fun for us kids to walk through . Think about thinking about the repercussions of great ideas and thought bubbles before you start a discussion in a vacuum.

We need much better not just better. I sincerely hope this think tank is capable of doing original research and campaigning for a much better Canberra not just an inland version of Sydney’s Green Square or Parramatta. While Canberra inevitably is a compromise between what is envisaged and what is do-able, let’s aim for a unique, well designed, safe and liveable city.

Local councils are the missing tier of government.

Sentimental defendants of the single level status quo, bang on that local councils is too hard and a “if it aint broke…etc ” kind of mentality opposing councils. However, in balance they are a more democratic, beneficial and transparent form of Local government for local issues than a state government.

The ACT needs to move beyond a ‘rule by committee’ adjunct to early self-government. Canberrans are constantly left out of what happens in their local areas. We are naive to believe that a minister, a government executive, committee member, board or sole public servant will see to things effectively. The level naivety is illustrated by a large number of Canberrans not realising we don’t have acutal councils. Hear them refer to the “the council will or should fix it” statements. They seem blindly unaware, its only a department bod who may or may not take up the issue, if you can find them.

The ABC 666 regular ‘Chief Minister talk-back’ says it all. Yes, great PR but listen to the issues raised – pot holes, broken curbs, bills, cat and trailer licenses a plethora of minor issues – these issues ought taken up by a real local council. The Chief shouldn’t be attending minutiae. It actually reflects that Canberrans often don’t know where to turn. So rather than just see the Chief’s hands-on profile and Radio 666 boosted, we should read between the lines. Its only shining light on the missing link.

The time is well and truly here to grow ourselves-up by initiated elected Local Councils to meet the burgeoning needs of all Canberrans and let the Territory Government govern our territorial (state) needs.

Jedi Mick

Peter Graves1:56 pm 02 Jan 24

Thus leading to higher taxes to pay for this unnecessary further level of “government”. Most of the alternatives I’ve seen being proposed for our nation are to lessen the levels of “government” – by suggesting abolition of the states. The ACT (deliberately) does not have a Governor, either.

Yes, I anticipated the higher taxes push-back story, however it may seen simplistically as a 1+1 =2 (double taxes) scenario but people in other states do not pay twice, as suggested.

Actually local governments are paid/subsidised accordingly, by complex state and federal governments grants, as well as their own tax revenues. They also provide, at the end-user-point, an elected and more transparent model than a single tier government, with unelected comittees.

Are you suggesting folks in other states flock to ACT to enjoy lower taxes and to gain higher quality services? Well they won’t and don’t partly because we are one of the highest taxed judiciaries and with our ineffectual single tier government.

My arguement for a two tier government system is about fulfilling better services, infrastructure, efficiency and fairer inclusion in the processes of democratic and transparent government. This is especially likely with a focus of and in local areas – meaning in our near suburbs or what could be in the future – local council catchments.

I think a future ACT model with locally elected local councils (and unlike comittees can be unelected ) – would be better equipped to deal with local issues, rather than the single tier Territory Government, who are clearly struggling to deal with big picture Territory issues and who fail to properly consult and heed local wishes and expectations.

I say let them work on the main functions. ie the maintaining and improving of Roads / Transport / Health Hospitals / Schools etc etc and leave the local stuff to councils like everywhere else in Australia.

The pressure Local Councils could take off the Government would be huge, inclusive and more fulfilling. Lets do it!

Local councils works in another places and the residents enjoy lower taxes than ACT residents.

Jedi Mick

Agree totally Jedi Mick. In other cities where there is a local council those local politicians are elected by ratepayers, making the pollies particularly sensitive to the opinions and desires of those who actually fund their activities. Planning, maintenance and local services are key concerns of those who own property, so councillors have to attend to them if they want to stay in their jobs. Property investors buy and rent out property where the local area is well-serviced and maintained, as this makes their property more desirable for renters and owners.

None of these mechanisms prompting politicians to look after the city’s maintenance, services and development for the long term operate in the ACT. Here politicians are elected by whoever happens to live here at the time, many of whom are temporary residents such as students. Not planning to stay for the rest of their lives, they don’t care about the long term care, maintenance and development of the area or its services, so do not vote for politicians based on these issues. They may complain, but have little interest in pushing to change things when they’re not staying here.

It’s very clear that our ACT government cares about students and young people, with little to no interest in looking after the interests and needs of older long term residents. Everything done here is about shiny marketing to young voters to make it a vibrant city, which is great, but to look after residents long term we need good public transport, health services, maintenance of paths, roads, gutters, trees, parks, public toilets etc. A red shiny tram whilst the city decays is not good enough. If we had local councils, that might change.

Stephen Saunders7:35 am 02 Jan 24

As a “think” tank, it is axiomatic, you want what donors and “stakeholders” want, not what people want. Endless growth.

Stakeholders should include all people affected, ie all who have a stake in the issue. However, in Canberra those consulted are not all people affected, just developers and politicians, plus other power-brokers, whilst public servants also have some input via the processes of planning and implementation.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.