3 December 2024

Nah, me and Tanya are good, says PM after rolling his own Environment Minister

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
12

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young and Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek thought they had a deal over environmental legislation until the PM stepped in. Photo: Tanya Plibersek Facebook.

Anthony Albanese says his government is still intent on establishing a national environmental watchdog despite blatantly disregarding the work of his Environment Minister, Tanya Plibersek.

But everything’s OK between them, he assures.

The Prime Minister overruled a deal Ms Plibersek had made with the Greens in the final days of Federal Parliament sitting for the year after he was pressured by the mining lobby and Labor’s WA Premier Roger Cook.

The logging industry had also expressed its displeasure over the prospect of new laws with more powers over the sector.

Ms Plibersek brokered a deal in writing with both Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young and ACT independent Senator David Pocock last week to support her Nature Positive legislation, which seeks to create two new agencies to collect environmental data and to enforce compliance with national environmental laws.

But no sooner had Ms Plibersek informed the PM of the deal than Mr Albanese started getting calls.

Both the Prime Minister and the WA Premier are facing elections in the first half of next year – a point the mining lobby and forestry industry are happy to stress to both leaders.

So the PM, accompanied by Finance Minister Katy Gallagher, met with Senator Hanson-Young and Greens leader Adam Bandt to tell them the deal was off.

That’s a Prime Minister’s prerogative, but to do so without informing Ms Plibersek, as has been reported, was a huge disrespect.

Now, many inside Labor ranks are unhappy, to say the least, about how Mr Albanese handled the situation.

READ ALSO Labor needs to show some fight and again be a party of reform to fend off Coalition

“Poor form” was the term offered to Region on Monday (2 December) by a number inside government ranks.

But the PM denies Ms Plibersek was snubbed and that, in fact, there never was a deal between the Greens and the government.

“Well, that wasn’t a letter from me,” he told ABC’s Insiders on Sunday (1 December).

“What we did was go through, and where there wasn’t agreement, they were set aside, and we progressed 45 different pieces of legislation … we were negotiating through a series of legislation. Forty-five pieces of legislation went through. Not everything did.

“But what we were assured, what we were certain about was that we wouldn’t make major changes. We wanted to stick to our values. We did that successfully. At the beginning of the week, no one was saying that we would pass 45 pieces of legislation … All ministers were informed … the whole way through.”

Mr Albanese said the government would still pursue the new environment laws at the right time and they won’t necessarily be subject to what the Greens want included.

“It’s our intention to proceed with them, but we’ll proceed with them on the basis of our values that we put forward,” the PM said.

He added: “We held the line on areas like housing. And they changed their mind, the Greens political party, and they went through unamended. We will hold to our values. We won’t allow any tail to wag the dog.”

READ ALSO New legislation makes it easier for Commonwealth frontline workers to get protection orders

In subsequent interviews, Mr Albanese has denied a feud between Ms Plibersek and himself.

For her part, the Environment Minister is largely staying quiet, only responding that results were “disappointing” and that there was some discussion with the PM and Senator Gallagher over the legislation.

Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has confirmed she believed a deal had been struck between the Greens and the government over the legislation.

“The Greens put a deal on the table, and the government has walked away,” she said.

“The Prime Minister has been bullied by the mining and logging lobby again.”

Senator Hanson-Young also criticised the Prime Minister’s move as disrespectful of Ms Plibersek.

“Gina Reinhart and the logging industry have more of a say than the Environment Minister,” she said.

Senator Pocock said Ms Plibersek was “really keen” to get the laws passed.

Premier Cook confirmed he had discussed the situation with the Prime Minister.

Join the conversation

12
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

There were many people who saw Tanya Plibersek as a good fit for PM, much more so than Albo. I’m not sure why they picked him to lead the party, unless it was a matter of seniority or that they wanted him to have the opportunity as this would be his last chance. Once he was PM, he sidelined Plibersek into a role where she wouldn’t be too much up front and probably where he didn’t think she could achieve much (especially with him supporting the mining lobby. When she did seem to be achieving something of value, he made sure she couldn’t by undermining her. It does seem that he sees her as a threat.

We have seen him behave in a similar way with others in the party such as Jim Chalmers & Jason Clare when each of them became prominent in the public eye, speaking out on their views and praised by the media. He basically overrode them or contradicted what they’d said.

They are all much better speakers than Albo, more likeable and with clearer values, but then you can say that about most members of the party. I used to think Albo had good clear values, but he’s gone against what he’s promoted in the past repeatedly now. Albanese seeks to push other members of his party back if they take too much of the limelight or threaten to outshine him, which most of them do without trying too hard. It feels like they’re all being careful not to upset him, restraining themselves to fall in line but this is a major mistake for the party and for Australia.

@psycho
I think you are right that, back in 2019, Plibersek would have been a good fit to lead the ALP and potentially PM.

As I understand it she chose not to run for the leadership in 2019 because she wanted to support her daughter who had just come out of an abusive relationship. While ‘wanting to spend more time with the family’ is often a political euphemism for “I was pushed out”, Plibersek was quite public at the time about her daughter’s trauma – so I suspect it is a reality of family coming first for her.

Certainly since Albo took over, Plibersek has been a much lesser light – probably by choice, but, for reasons of self preservation, Albo did nothing to bring her forward.

I also agree with your view on Chalmers and Clare over the vey disappointing Albo.

HiddenDragon9:44 pm 03 Dec 24

“Mr Albanese said the government would still pursue the new environment laws at the right time and they won’t necessarily be subject to what the Greens want included.”

A gift to the Greens and the Coalition – a PM shooting himself in both feet simultaneously is quite an achievement.

This backflip will be another great product differentiation opportunity for the Greens, and to the extent that it enhances the Greens’ primary vote at the expense of Labor, it will be that much easier for the Coalition to run ads along the lines of “a vote for Labor is a vote for Adam Bandt as Co-PM” – maybe even Bandt as the puppet master pulling the strings of a PM with a Pinocchio-style nose.

Even more potent for the Coalition will be the ads they will be able to run in pursuit of those crucial WA seats – “a vote for Labor is a vote for an Over East/Canberra EPA”.

tanya has the unions in her corner hence why albo is so scared.

I suspect Albo’s political hero, Tom Uren, would turn in his grave at the timidity shown by this Prime Minister.
If Tanya’s work does indeed come to nothing, I hope it hangs around his head like the proverbial albatross (or should that be albotross).
He already has one there with his seeming capitulation over gambling advertising.
I only hope that one day, he comes to realise that being a decisive leader makes him more electable than being a wimp.

Julie Lindner1:47 pm 03 Dec 24

Labor has certainly lost their once held principles they are almost as bad as the LNP. They have lost the ability to communicate with their constituents but continue avidly communicating with the mining lobby. Hopefully, they will be replaced with independents at the next election.

Prime Minister says, “We will hold to our values.” Labor’s values! Can anyone find them? They seem to have gone missing.

Sadly Labor, the alleged working persons party has no values any more.

Very online Labor supporters must be having a hard time looking at their “hot Albo” posters.

As far as I can see Albo’s only real use as PM is he’s less bad than Dutton.

I am not sure I have ever seen a “hot Albo” poster Seano, nor could I imagine one existing.

I have not seen any indication that Labor under Albanese is any different from the opposition with both parties doing their best to outdo each other on meanness and nastiness.

I have lost track of what Labor values are and which Albanese keeps banging on about but seem to have been trashed under his leadership. Labor policy is now determined by the opposition, the WA government and their mining and logging industry mates with our sovereignty and defence handed over to the US.

Senator David Pocock and other independents are looking more electable every day!

Agree Jack, Labor/Liberal are two sides of the same coin…one’s slightly worse but otherwise they’re largely interchangeable.

I too am happy to continue to support moderate, centrist, sensible independents not owned but billionaire donors or unions.

@Jack D.
Yes indeed – given that neither Albo returned nor Dutton installed, are (arguably) palatable to the ‘non-rusted-on’ electorate, a minority government, with independents holding the balance of power, is definitely gaining traction.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.