Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

ADFA cadet charged over shower video

By johnboy - 26 August 2011 111

A 21-year-old male cadet has been arrested following an incident at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) last night (Thursday, August 25).

Police will allege that a 21-year-old female cadet found a mobile phone hidden in a vent above a shower at her accommodation block at ADFA. The phone was recording video while the woman was showering.

ADFA staff located the owner of the phone and contacted ACT Policing.

Police attended ADFA around 11.50pm, and seized the mobile phone, laptop and a USB memory stick from the man’s room.

The man was arrested and taken to the ACT Watch House, where he was charged with an Act of Indecency without Consent.

He will face the ACT Magistrates Court this morning, where bail will be opposed.

[Courtesy ACT Policing]

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
111 Responses to
ADFA cadet charged over shower video
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
6
Mr Gillespie 8:39 pm 29 Aug 11

Deckard said :

Mr Gillespie said :

Ok then (serious question), why is it, in the 21st Century, do we still have separate male and female toilets?

To let women go to the toilet in peace away from the likes of you…

Yeah but they still have other women, WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE!!!

Deckard 7:17 pm 29 Aug 11

Mr Gillespie said :

Ok then (serious question), why is it, in the 21st Century, do we still have separate male and female toilets?

To let women go to the toilet in peace away from the likes of you…

Mr Gillespie 4:55 pm 29 Aug 11

Jungle Jim said :

………………wrt post #94 – Women too share public toilet blocks… wait for it – with other women! I can assure you that Jungle Jane has confessed to me many a time that the ladies can be just as disgusting as the mens.

Ok then (serious question), why is it, in the 21st Century, do we still have separate male and female toilets?

JennD 12:38 pm 29 Aug 11

I’d like to ask about the idea that it’s actually possible for people to use their Imaginations to get off, that there’s no need to be going about filming people – I’d say things like this are less about individuals sex drive and wanting to get off. It’s actually about group dynamics and cultures in which activities like this are acceptable, even hilarious. Most of us grew up watching stupid s*** like Animal House and other tripe from the USA showing us how ‘cool’ and hilarious hijinx against the female sorority houses are, why wouldn’t people think this kind of thing is acceptable? Unfortunately it’s quite common still but it’ll change with time as we continue working towards incorporating equal access and opportunity. I’d be ok with dual sex toilets, it’s not like women’s toilets are usually any cleaner or nicer than the blokes.

Jungle Jim 11:22 am 29 Aug 11

Mr Gillespie said :

“No Comment”

So, you’re either opposed to having your female famliy members filmed without their consent, but wont admit it as it abolishes your entire argument, or you feel that no woman should feel violated by the filming of their naken bodies without consent (a possibility that makes me wonder if you haven’t indulged in some secret fimling of your own).

Also, wrt post #94 – Women too share public toilet blocks… wait for it – with other women! I can assure you that Jungle Jane has confessed to me many a time that the ladies can be just as disgusting as the mens.

Stevian 11:00 am 29 Aug 11

Mr Gillespie said :

{Nothing of any importance}

Get over yourself

DUB 9:54 am 29 Aug 11

Can’t they just have porn stored on some portable HDD? Go out to the city, find Wi-Fi hotspot, use it do download good quality stuff from GGG or 666. LOL.

Henry82 9:42 am 29 Aug 11

dvaey said :

, that lifting any anti-pornography rules on their internet access would probably solve many problems.

I’d say that would open some opportunities for new problems.

My post is on this thread somewhere about what to do.

dvaey 8:35 am 29 Aug 11

Out of interest, I wonder what ADFAs policy is on these cadets accessing pornographic material online. Something makes me think that an easier solution to these sex-deprived cadets making their own voyeuristic films, that lifting any anti-pornography rules on their internet access would probably solve many problems. Other than the ‘inappropriate use’ of the internet service provided to them.. but which would they prefer, cadets secretly filming other cadets, or cadets discreetly downloading porn on the institutions internet?

Mr Gillespie 3:18 am 29 Aug 11

So, you’re saying I make personal attacks on others? What about the many personal attacks on me, like the nasty little innuendos about me and Erin Molan, and implications about me that makes me a “sick puppy” and I am a psychopath who likes watching people take a shower, just like the one accused in this particular police press release.

In this thread alone, just about every second post has been a personal attack on me, since I first commented on someone’s post about female complainants being brainwashed by the feminist lobby into causing the trouble that has been going on this year at ADFA.

Some of the best examples in this thread alone are:

“Mr. G, you are quite simply a disgusting human being.” (That’snotme, in post #30)

“Ok, so you’re either one of the better trolls I’ve seen (and if so, kudos to you sir!), or you’re you’re completely disassociated from the morals that exist in civilised society. I find myself hoping that you’re just a troll…because it’s honestly disturbing to think that I share this city with [you]……” by That’snotme in post #37

Johnboy #52 saying I “sexually harassed a public figure via YouTube” and that other male readers “caught you trying to destroy evidence of that” when I answer back to the previous innuendos about Erin Molan, and as a bonus he throws in links reminding us of that abuse-filled thread of stupidity.

Then there are the repeated demands for answers to things I do in my own personal life that have got nothing to do with any user of this forum, just so they could satisfy their own disgusting curiosity in front of all, sundry, and Google, the question having a nasty innuendo attached to it which if dignified with an answer would lead only to accusations that I am lying or a hypocrit, or I really am capable of doing things seen by said readers as really nasty and horrendous. So no, I am NOT going to dignify that question with an answer and as such I have told you, NO COMMENT.

……& you’re saying that I’M not “self-aware” enough that *I* make personal attacks against THEM?

Oh for God sake……wake up willya?

mutley 10:10 pm 28 Aug 11

Mr Gillespie said :

Huh?¿? What’s so funny about it??

The complete lack of self-awareness?

6

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site