Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Avani Terraces - Greenway
Life is looking up

Alleged Braddon child smutmonger arrested

By johnboy - 23 April 2011 16

ACT Policing’s Criminal Investigations detectives from the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Team, have arrested a 56 year-old Braddon man with a number of offences relating to sexual intercourse with young persons.

Police executed a search warrant at an address in Braddon on Thursday night (April 21) and seized a number of items. The man was arrested at the conclusion of the search warrant and taken to the ACT Regional Watch House.

The alleged offender was charged with sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16, possessing child pornography and producing child pornography. Police will be opposing bail.

[Courtesy ACT Policing]

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
16 Responses to
Alleged Braddon child smutmonger arrested
colourful sydney rac 11:34 am 04 May 11

beyondthelaw said :

Wait till he is convicted, The Frots? The police gained a search warrant, entered the house and seized child pornography, obviously consisting of this rock spider filming the innocent subjects as well as being involved in sex acts which he filmed. The Frots, your comment concerns me and usually people who make these type of comments condone this type of sick behaviour and maybe involved in this type of peadophillia

What an outrageous statement. You clearly have no understanding of the Australian legal system.

beyondthelaw 11:14 am 04 May 11

Wait till he is convicted, The Frots? The police gained a search warrant, entered the house and seized child pornography, obviously consisting of this rock spider filming the innocent subjects as well as being involved in sex acts which he filmed. The Frots, your comment concerns me and usually people who make these type of comments condone this type of sick behaviour and maybe involved in this type of peadophillia

colourful sydney rac 1:28 pm 27 Apr 11

georgesgenitals said :

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Wait until he’s convicted – we can lynch him online later.

And y’all will.

The Frots 1:27 pm 27 Apr 11

georgesgenitals said :

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Wait until he’s convicted – we can lynch him online later.

Agreed!

georgesgenitals 1:12 pm 27 Apr 11

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Wait until he’s convicted – we can lynch him online later.

colourful sydney rac 11:24 am 27 Apr 11

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Lookout Smithers 9:15 pm 25 Apr 11

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

No one is defending anyone, the reason being that he has been charged and not even tried yet. Have you considered just the one scenario here? People don’t generally defend those behaviors on the whole. It’s over reactions like this that get people annoyed. Let the process happen and think of all the possibilities, I ‘m sure you have heard of cases put forward by prosecutors with circumstantial evidence and been laughed out of the building and and made pay heavy compensation for the privilege. Look up Andrew Mallard or Graham Stafford. It does happen.

Grumpy Old Fart 7:32 pm 25 Apr 11

JessP this is also one of the nuances of the reporting that takes place to ensure that the accused is not prejudiced if the matter goes to trial. For all we know he may have been previously convicted and is on the sex offenders register but it can’t be mentioned in this press release.

In terms of libel I do not think this would be the case SupamanDatHo if the Police had a warrant I think that they must have some fairly substantial evidence and given the apparent result of the raid it would seem to have been accurate.

I think creatures like this once convicted should be covered in tar and feathers and clearly labeled as a rock spider low life piece of scum degenerate

Spideydog 10:27 pm 24 Apr 11

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

Whilst I do hate rockspiders and think they should be neutered …….. our legal system does work around the basis of “innocent until proven guilty” This alleged rockspider has not been proven as yet.

If and/or when they are found guilty, then let the public neutering begin 🙂

JessP 8:35 pm 24 Apr 11

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

Tooks 8:35 am 24 Apr 11

SupamanDatHo said :

Maybe you should wait until he is convicted before libeling him.

Maybe you should learn the law before gobbing off about it.

screaming banshee 7:56 am 24 Apr 11

Look ma, a long-weekend troll

Maybe you should wait until someone makes libelous (sp?) statements before defending him, or did you already hear some when you went to visit him in the lockup?

The Frots 7:46 am 24 Apr 11

SupamanDatHo said :

Maybe you should wait until he is convicted before libeling him.

You are kidding…………..right?

gospeedygo 7:09 am 24 Apr 11

SupamanDatHo said :

Maybe you should wait until he is convicted before libeling him.

What, isn’t ‘alleged’ good enough? (says the person with the username from a bad rap song.)

SupamanDatHo 8:07 pm 23 Apr 11

Maybe you should wait until he is convicted before libeling him.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site