5 July 2021

Are private landowners destroying the courtesy of community access on the south coast?

| Zoya Patel
Join the conversation
27
Rosedale Beach

Rosedale Beach on the South Coast. Photo: Kim Treasure.

Like most Canberrans, I spend a fair bit of time down at the south coast. We’re lucky to be able to drive just a few hours and access (in my opinion) the best beaches in Australia, without the crowds of beaches closer to big cities.

Since childhood, I have enjoyed wandering down the little trails that weave through the forest that fringes beaches from Moruya to Bermagui, trodden down by hundreds of fellow visitors and residents to provide access to the hidden bays and coves along the coastline.

By unspoken mutual agreement, we have maintained these paths over generations, keeping them clean and free from litter, and limiting our impact on the surrounding forest by sticking to the trails we’ve made.

One such path that I’ve only recently come across is the trail that leads from the base of Tranquil Bay Close at Rosedale to the eponymous beach – a tiny, secluded stretch of sand only a few hundred metres long, with some of the clearest, calmest water and additional trails leading off the beach to cliff walks that locals have enjoyed for a long time.

Tranquil Bay path

The boundary fence on the path at Tranquil Bay. Photo: Zoya Patel.

Only on my latest visit, we started down the trail to be confronted by a large swathe of cleared bush and a wooden and wire fence, cutting off the path to the beach. Glancing in either direction, the fenceline stretches on and on – technically you can still access the path if you go all the way along the fence to where it ends, and head around it. But the beautiful, uninterrupted forest trail is no more.

Asking the locals, it turns out that the land they have shared and used as a common path is actually partially owned by the residents of one of the houses that sits behind it.

I don’t know the intricacies of this specific case, and I don’t own a property in Rosedale, so I can only speak from anecdote. But I have to wonder, in the absence of common land, can’t we at least retain common decency?

READ ALSO Seaplanes bid a tipping point for Canberra, say Lake Guardians

This landowner, and any other who chooses to take similar actions on their own big bush blocks at the coast, is technically within their rights to erect a boundary fence, and clear the land on either side of it for access (and potential fire hazard reduction).

But just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should, and it makes me particularly frustrated for the wildlife who have been able to enjoy free access in the bush until this point, and now have to figure out a way through, over, or around the extremely long fenceline.

In parts of Europe and the UK there are ‘right to roam’ laws that mean landowners have to allow access to walkers on certain land types, primarily in rural, country and nature settings. I wish something similar existed in Australia to protect the freedoms that have been enjoyed for so long, but that are clearly tenuously hinged on the common decency of the individual.

In the absence of such a law, I’m sure many Rosedale residents feel quite bereft at their loss of tranquillity at Tranquil Bay.

Join the conversation

27
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Latest

The state government is too blame, they should have allowed clauses in sale for right of access or simply left access corridors.

“just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should”, exactly. Just because you can enter and walk across someone’s private land to get to the beach you probably shouldn’t, have some respect for others property.

Matthew James10:47 am 02 Jul 21

There is public right-of-way both North and South (but not East) from the end of Tranquil Bay Close.
People are perfectly entitled to fence off private land and unless somebody has fenced off the public right-of-way, nobody is stopping you from reaching the beach via public land.
If you want to do a bit of investigative journalism, get hold of the DP, figure out exactly where the fence is in relation to official boundaries and tell us if it’s an illegal fence or not.

Finagen_erection8:35 am 02 Jul 21

Tricky one,
Public beaches need reasonable public access points. If this particular beach has that, then we can’t really complain at this land owner decision.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.