Bomber’s dismissal review dismissed

Joe Canberran 25 January 2008 3

ABC online line has here one of the best opening lines I’ve read for a while in describing the the Federal Court’s finding in convicted letter bomber Colin George Dunstan’s unfair dismissal claim against the ATO, the reason he went on a letter bombing campaign back in 1998.

I wonder, given he is currently out on parole after 7 years in jail for how he reacted last time he got some bad news, how he will take this?

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
3 Responses to Bomber’s dismissal review dismissed
I-filed I-filed 9:16 pm 25 Jan 08

John Terrence Conway and the chilling Anu Singh are both a thousand times worse than Dunstan. “Notorious litigist” would have been better .He’s more of Eastman’s ilk.

Deano Deano 9:06 pm 25 Jan 08

Another legal chapter in the long running case of one of Canberra’s most notorious criminals has come to a close.

notorious – having an exceedingly bad reputation; Generally known and talked of by the public usually in an unfavorable sense.

I would have thought he was more a nutter than a notorious criminal. Mind you, I can’t think of any other notorious criminals operating in Canberra, so I’ll suppose he’ll have to do.

Headbone Headbone 8:46 pm 25 Jan 08

Now what was that rap song?……Things that make you go Boom or Hmmmmmm??????

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site