Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Experts in Wills, Trusts
& Estate Planning

Canberra men don’t want to be teachers

By johnboy 10 October 2010 220

The Canberra Times notes that the ACT has the lowest percentage of male teachers in Australia and that number’s dropping.

The Department of Education and Training’s 2009-10 annual report showed government schools had even fewer men than the territory overall, with the ratio of male to female staff at 22per cent to 78per cent, which has remained constant for the past two years.

However, in spite of the imbalance, the department has no plan to encourage more men into the ranks of teaching.

”The DET’s focus is on recruiting quality teachers, rather than specifically targeting men,” a spokesman said.

Anyone want to speculate as to why?


What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
220 Responses to
Canberra men don’t want to be teachers
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
11
STOLEN CAR 8:03 pm 14 Nov 10

bd84 said :

p1 said :

Inappropriate said :

It’s simple: shit pay, poor career progression, and the constant threat of being labelled a kiddy-fiddler.

These are the three biggest reasons I didn’t go into teaching.

Just add in the political correct world gone mad that censors the curriculum to the useless topics and creates a system that prevents teachers from being able to properly control and discipline the students.

Above are all spot on comments…

You could also add in a system where teachers are not supported but are instead kept on the revolving door of contract employment… see today’s Canberra Times link here:

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/five-years-on-teacher-steps-off-treadmill-of-impermanence/1996692.aspx

Andrew BARR … your comments please ?

Please don’t tell us that you value education but can’t see the link to supporting teachers that this might entail ?

http://www.det.act.gov.au/minister

Andrew Barr.
Phone: (02) 6205 0011
Fax: (02) 6205 0157
Email: barr@act.gov.au

Gerry-Built said :

shadow boxer said :

shadow boxer said :
Nah, it was vague because you didn’t want to post the fact teachers get 12 weeks paid holidays a year where, according to an earlier post from a teacher, they may get called in for up to 5 days personal development.

You need to re-read previous posts and re-educate yourself on this issue. Teachers don’t have 12 weeks above what everyone else gets.

12 weeks class free;
remove 4 weeks for annual leave (a right enjoyed by all F/T workers). Of the remaining ‘stand down’; remove 5/6 *mandatory* days PD (1 or 2x DET Priority, 2x School Priority, 1x Faculty Priority and 1x Personal; now remove up to 10 days of Public Holidays (2010 has been unusual, as all but 4 days PH fell outside School Breaks – but usually Easter and ANZAC day are within School Holidays)

Therefore *at maximum*, the additional weeks equate to 6. That is ‘fact’ – absolutely verifiable on the DET or AEU ACT websites. Given the work teachers undertake, the pace and stress faced, those 6 weeks are one of the perks of the job (and definitely does not mean no-one else experience similar in their own work environments). Each job has its own perks, and its own problems, but note that those 6 weeks are not enough “luxury” to counter the negatives enough to either attract enough high quality applicants, nor sustain most of the high quality applicants in teaching careers beyond 10 years (Canberra Times today).

Perpetuating the myth that teachers have 12 weeks holidays, simply because we get 12 weeks without directly facing our classes, is a cop out on your part, and wa-ay too simplistic an argument to refute with fact. An increasing majority of a teachers job is undertaken away from the classroom, and some of that is undertaken outside of the school environment.

Neither financial incentive, nor 6 weeks additional leave, has been enough to attract and retain enough teachers to the profession (world-wide). In the ACT, the local government has devalued the profession by painting us as trouble-makers in the public eye simply for refusing to trade off work conditions or negatively affect our students conditions, and using negative language against us, such as “attracting better quality teachers” (giving the impression none already exist) – and some of that mud has stuck, as evidenced by attitudes such as yours and Mr Knox’s.

Don’t waste your time. John Knox is not interested in facts, his illinformed opinion is the only thing that matters.

Tooks 9:45 am 25 Oct 10

I looked at a table of teacher salaries the other day and they are way underpaid in my opinion. Very difficult job, especially for high school teachers.

Jethro 8:21 am 25 Oct 10

Weekend just gone there was a Canberra Times article about teaching conditions and projected retention rates of new teachers in the ACT system.

Link is here: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/new-act-teachers-ready-to-ditch-job/1977310.aspx

Gerry-Built 11:45 pm 24 Oct 10

shadow boxer said :

shadow boxer said :
Nah, it was vague because you didn’t want to post the fact teachers get 12 weeks paid holidays a year where, according to an earlier post from a teacher, they may get called in for up to 5 days personal development.

You need to re-read previous posts and re-educate yourself on this issue. Teachers don’t have 12 weeks above what everyone else gets.

12 weeks class free;
remove 4 weeks for annual leave (a right enjoyed by all F/T workers). Of the remaining ‘stand down’; remove 5/6 *mandatory* days PD (1 or 2x DET Priority, 2x School Priority, 1x Faculty Priority and 1x Personal; now remove up to 10 days of Public Holidays (2010 has been unusual, as all but 4 days PH fell outside School Breaks – but usually Easter and ANZAC day are within School Holidays)

Therefore *at maximum*, the additional weeks equate to 6. That is ‘fact’ – absolutely verifiable on the DET or AEU ACT websites. Given the work teachers undertake, the pace and stress faced, those 6 weeks are one of the perks of the job (and definitely does not mean no-one else experience similar in their own work environments). Each job has its own perks, and its own problems, but note that those 6 weeks are not enough “luxury” to counter the negatives enough to either attract enough high quality applicants, nor sustain most of the high quality applicants in teaching careers beyond 10 years (Canberra Times today).

Perpetuating the myth that teachers have 12 weeks holidays, simply because we get 12 weeks without directly facing our classes, is a cop out on your part, and wa-ay too simplistic an argument to refute with fact. An increasing majority of a teachers job is undertaken away from the classroom, and some of that is undertaken outside of the school environment.

Neither financial incentive, nor 6 weeks additional leave, has been enough to attract and retain enough teachers to the profession (world-wide). In the ACT, the local government has devalued the profession by painting us as trouble-makers in the public eye simply for refusing to trade off work conditions or negatively affect our students conditions, and using negative language against us, such as “attracting better quality teachers” (giving the impression none already exist) – and some of that mud has stuck, as evidenced by attitudes such as yours and Mr Knox’s.

gp 7:48 pm 24 Oct 10

For what it’s worth:

I am male, 12 years teaching in the primary classroom in ACT. I get to work by 8am and leave at 5ish. I usually do an hour or more most evenings marking, planning and data entry. I work half a day each weekend on average. At reports time, weekends are a distant memory (like this weekend!). Holidays… I spend 3 days working each term break, a week of my own time at Christmas break and the mandated 4-5 days PD at schools. We are also mandated to do a day of our own time over the year. These times are common for most teachers in ACT.

I average 1/2 an hour break from 8-5 most days. Some days less.

I love being a teacher, however the conditions are sometimes a little hectic. I think what wears many teachers out is the non-stop pace during the workday, where most teachers feel the need to almost run between areas of the school knowing the little kids could get into some serious strife if not kept very busy. We also take ourselves very seriously… sometimes too much. 🙂

Sadly, another tiring part of teaching is the frequent need to guide others, all day, to choose the correct behaviours, knowing the need to do it again later, or the next day, and the next, at the same time knowing parents often do not pass on the same values that we try to instill in the students.

When standdown rolls around, most teachers are simply worn out. Most parents comment on wanting school back to take a break from their own children! Times that by 25 and then you do feel a little tired.

Being male, kids and parents both assume the best insult is to imply that I am gay and a kiddy fiddler. I’m not, but all it takes over a career is one disgruntled little kid to make a comment to get back at you for sending them to time out. This is by far the biggest concern of any male teacher. I joined the union just for the legal assistance I would need.

Rant almost over. Teaching is great, sign up. The intrinsic rewards are great, the money not so much, but all teachers know that before they start. Holidays are nice, but much needed. I, for one, would put in more time if the pay were greater. A bit of fence sitting there.

Spend a day in a school, as an adult. Further your education.

georgesgenitals 6:28 pm 24 Oct 10

Jim Jones said :

JohnKnox said :

When Im at work Im actually working. I myself have no time to go to coffees and I get about ½ for lunch most days.

Certainly seems as if you’ve got plenty of time to spend on the internet, though.

Maybe he’s on school holidays?

Jim Jones 5:22 pm 24 Oct 10

JohnKnox said :

When Im at work Im actually working. I myself have no time to go to coffees and I get about ½ for lunch most days.

Certainly seems as if you’ve got plenty of time to spend on the internet, though.

Mr Evil 4:43 pm 24 Oct 10

All teechers is dum, and they get payed enuff allredy!

I wouldn’t be a teacher for all the money in the world – but that’s mainly because I would be liable to throttle some of the little turds they have to put up with during their day at work. For that reason alone, I have no problem with teachers getting more than four weeks annual leave each year.

My personal opinion is that sadly teaching, like nursing, is a much undervalued profession in this world where nowadays someone who can cook cous cous in 250 different ways and plate a sparrow’s wing and glazed Kumquat nicely are held in such high regard.

The other problem with teaching is that too many parents expect teachers to rectify issues in their children that they are either too damn lazy or stupid to fix themselves.

Yes, there are some useless teachers around; but then there are also some useless public servants/pilots/politicians/doctors/plumbers/electricians/etc as well.

shadow boxer 3:40 pm 24 Oct 10

shadow boxer said :

“It’s not a few weeks, we all know it and the fact you couldn’t bring yourself to post the actual figure and chose to vague it up speaks volumes”

One of my early posts (#39) on this thread outlined that exact point… if it was too vague for you (vague only because it changes slightly from year to year – except for the 4 weeks annual leave in Jan. – which is a worker’s legal right enjoyed by most employees in Australia), let me know and I will happily post a detailed explanation of the PD and Public Holidays from 2009, 2010 and 2011 school years. Here at your insistence – by my calculation, at most, 6 weeks extra; well and truly justifiable given the work hours and conditions (Yes – not an “actual figure” but it changes, within a few days, from year to year).

Nah, it was vague because you didn’t want to post the fact teachers get 12 weeks paid holidays a year where, according to an earlier post from a teacher, they may get called in for up to 5 days personal development.

No other occupation gets that sort of luxury…. teaching is important and i’m sure reasonably difficult at the high school level but is teaching ants in the apple year after year really so hard it requires special forces style R and R ?

Good luck to you but seriously this working stiff isn’t buying it.

Grotto 7:34 am 24 Oct 10

JohnKnox said :

“teachers are hard done by and should be put on a pedestal for all to worship”

Clamber down from your pedestal for a moment JohnKnox and dribble on about something you actually know about.

Gerry-Built 12:45 am 24 Oct 10

JohnKnox said :

Wow Gerry – such anger in your posts. What gives?

The length of my response to your single post was why I didn’t go back through all your posts and respond to every incredulous, self-righteous or indeed insensitive thing you said. In fact, I didn’t even respond to everything in that post.

I had no anger in my responses; I clearly formulated and articulated arguments against statements you made, which, in my experience (HS teacher, Public System) have painted the teaching profession in a manner that is perpetuating myth. You choose to paint them as “fact” (which they absolutely are not – hence “bull!” – okay let’s tone that down to “untrue” or “I’m afraid I do not believe that, and to counter it, I offer…”), because your ‘teacher friends’ “told you so” (hence, their, and your; “opinion”). I am not the only teacher who has posted here to tell you that you’re wrong (at least for the majority of teachers, who act professionally and consistently improve their Curriculum. You have an opinion that teachers are paid about right for what they do. Your experience of what teachers do is not holistically true – just trying to establish that for you. I have not been “bitching and moaning” about it, but pointing out the inaccuracies of your argument. I have not personally attacked you, but I have noted you have extremely thin skin, calling foul everytime someone disagrees with you (ie #149). Neither have I said “shut up…”, that was your own interpretation. I also never said that Teachers should be paid like Doctors… wow! you certainly do a lot of interpretation of peoples’ comments, but really are quick to cry foul when someone does that to you. Saying someone is not “typical” (which, if I remember right, was your own wording) does not equate to “abnormal”. Putting “Teacher Friends” in quotes didn’t deny their existence – it was a quote from your post. Stop interpreting… please! I put time into deliberately choosing my words, and articulate my arguments clearly and carefully (at least on long, considered posts such as this one)- and I’ve allowed you the same privilege, trying not to resort to misinterpretation, anger and name calling.

shadow boxer said :

It’s not a few weeks, we all know it and the fact you couldn’t bring yourself to post the actual figure and chose to vague it up speaks volumes

One of my early posts (#39) on this thread outlined that exact point… if it was too vague for you (vague only because it changes slightly from year to year – except for the 4 weeks annual leave in Jan. – which is a worker’s legal right enjoyed by most employees in Australia), let me know and I will happily post a detailed explanation of the PD and Public Holidays from 2009, 2010 and 2011 school years. Here at your insistence – by my calculation, at most, 6 weeks extra; well and truly justifiable given the work hours and conditions (Yes – not an “actual figure” but it changes, within a few days, from year to year).

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

But still free training provided by your employer is a pretty good deal wouldn’t you say?

No – actually, in this country, it is a legal obligation of your employer.

It’s called the “Training Guarantee Act (1990)” and obligates your (meaning everyones’ – to the best of my knowledge) employer to spend money on training staff. You (meaning you, JohnKnox) should get to know your rights at work – because you might be missing out some that many people have fought hard to earn for you in the past. It is a good deal – but one enjoyed by every employee (covered by the Act).

Additionally, all Australian workers (to the best of my knowledge) have a legal right to 4 weeks leave, annually. Who is it that works 51 weeks, without Public Hols?

Finally, (especially for JohnKnox); I’ve no anger toward you. Indeed, If I was introduced to you tomorrow (or later today as it turns out), I’d harbour no resentment toward you at all (in all sincerity), because I agree you have a right to your opinion. But in having that right, you also have a responsibility to accept any retorts (including mine), especially if the case you present is based on spurious opinions, arguments and claims, with little basis in fact.

Don’t feel that you need to drop this argument, accept that there is a retort to your understandings of the profession I am in, and be open to correction over your assumptions of things like 12 weeks leave. I don’t doubt that you think teachers are paid what you think they deserve – given your understandings of the profession. But understand that what you think is based on some incorrect assumptions. On the other hand,(at least some of) what I have said is fact – in the pure sense, because they can actually be *verified*.

Thumper 9:10 pm 23 Oct 10

wow.. that has to be the longest post i’ve ever read, which means that it is crap. Seriously, if you can’t get your point across in a couple of paragraphs then your point is mute.

Aprat from the fact that you most obviously know nothing about teaching, which you’ve amply shown throughout this thread.

shadow boxer 7:45 pm 23 Oct 10

Good post Gerry Built but you let yourself down with this bit

JohnKnox said :

“they don’t work the same quantity of hours as the majority of the rest of the workforce.”

Out of all the jobs I have experienced, the teaching profession is by far the busiest – and the trade off of having a few weeks in addition to those enjoyed by other workers is well justified

It’s not a few weeks, we all know it and the fact you couldn’t bring yourself to post the actual figure and chose to vague it up speaks volumes

JohnKnox 5:16 pm 23 Oct 10

Gerry-Built said :

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

Well obviously you dont know me. Because I actually know a number of people in the teaching profession. That’s where my facts come from.

Feel free to share with us all, some of the ‘facts’ of the luxurious conditions your teacher friends are have regaled you with…

…so go ahead… regale away… ‘facts’ aplenty…

Read my other posts and you will find the answer to this.

JohnKnox 5:15 pm 23 Oct 10

Wow Gerry – such anger in your posts. What gives? Is the fact that someone may have an opinion that teachers are paid about the right wages for what they do rather than saying they are hard done by and should be paid like doctors offending you?

Before I come to your post can I ask why you focussed on only one of my posts instead of the complete picture? I mean if you look at yesterday I actually had a fair bit to say BUT it was all pointing to the fact that based upon what my friends say and what I observe through dealing with both my own schooling and that of my kids I still can’t see teachers working these so called slave hours 365 days a year 20 odd hours a day (oh yeah and before you flame me on that it was exaggerating a point). I also pointed out that just because my opinion differs to some others here then there is no reason we have to get into this stupid riotact mentality of name calling and “just shut up you know nothing” crap.

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

guess what all but one said yes they did have to go to a couple of days training but most of the professional development comprised of being given a work book to complete by the end of the holidays (which of course most did the night before like all of us do).

If that is indeed the case, your “teacher friends” are far from ‘typical’.

So the experience my friends have differs from your own = they are wrong and are obviously atypical? Wow with arguments like that how could I ever have doubted the fact?

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

But still free training provided by your employer is a pretty good deal wouldn’t you say?

No – actually, in this country, it is a legal obligation of your employer.

Legal obligation? Sorry I’m not that familiar with those laws. I mean OH&S, workplace safety, harassment. Yep I know of all those types but I didn’t know employers were obligated to also improve their staff through training. Happy to have people prove me wrong here – just show me the legislation that in this country every employer has to provide training (and Im not talking about on the job training like working heavy machinery here Im talking training that improves an employee). BTW does that mean if I work at a BP servo then I can be trained up as a doctor too? Just wondering.

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

As for planning apparently the hard work is done in the first year of teaching when you develop your first plan. After that you just have to amend it here and there. I’d say that that hardly sounds like 12 weeks worth of intense workload.

Absolute bull! Again – your “teacher friends” are far from ‘typical’. Curriculum is always being updated, and there is no functioning teacher who is not regularly reviewing what they deliver and how they deliver it, along with the requirement to add in National, DET and School priorities.

ABSOLUTE bull eh? So once again, as above, my friends have a differing experience so they must be wrong. And curriculum changes so dramatically that it takes 12 weeks to update? OK minus the training let’s say 8 weeks. As for all teachers constantly reviewing what they deliver. Come on. Really? Either that statement is grossly overstated or maybe teachers need training in how to manage their time better?

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

This would be because they hardly work the hours that entitle overtime / flex etc.
…With most lunches (apart from when they’re on duty) and classes like library studies and gym they do get an hour available here and there to do some admin work.

OMG! Your “teacher friends are from American movies… it all makes sense now!!! However, I’d like to point out, that in your own words in this quote, you have just identified that even during ‘breaks’ – teachers are performing day-to-day work tasks… administrative tasks and planning tasks take time out of class time, as does following up on student behaviour, supervising extra curricular activities, planning social activities, running assessment, marking/grading, staff social activities, sporting activities etc. When was the last time one of your “teacher friends” was able to meet you to catch up for a coffee (yet alone lunch) during a school day?

So my friends’ experience differs from yours again so they must be from American movies? How could I ever have had an opinion different to yours Gerry? I mean you’ve won me with that.

So teachers have to work during ‘breaks’ (sorry non-face to face teaching periods) as opposed to the majority of the workforce that has to … wait for it. Work during non face to face work periods. It’s no different to the rest of us. Except we tend not to b!tch and moan about it.

As for lunches well here’s the thing Gerry. When Im at work Im actually working. I myself have no time to go to coffees and I get about ½ for lunch most days. I’d expect exactly the same from all my friends including those that are teachers.

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

they don’t work the same quantity of hours as the majority of the rest of the workforce.

Out of all the jobs I have experienced, the teaching profession is by far the busiest – and the trade off of having a few weeks in addition to those enjoyed by other workers is well justified.

OK I fully take this statement. In your experience it was the busiest job you’ve done. I have know doubt that is the case. As for the trade off we are in agreement for once. Whereas, I see the extra weeks as the trade off for getting better wages. You see the extra weeks as a trade off for the hours you see teachers doing. Either way it is a tradeoff and they are getting extra weeks to the rest of the workforce.
BTW thankyou for finally putting a statement in here that doesn’t go back to the “well you friends are full of sh!t”, “you are full of sh!t” or “shut up what would you know”. It’s a pleasure to actually read your opinion without trolling through the insults.

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

“teachers are hard done by and should be put on a pedestal for all to worship” religion will now come along to flame me.

Teachers don’t expect to be put on a pedestal – there certainly won’t be any standing idly by to allow you to continue to perpetuate myths about the teaching profession. Teaching is being devalued from the outside by attitudes like yours, not from the inside, reflective of the abilities and conditions of those *actually* in the profession.

I simply do not believe you have access to friends who teach – or if you do, the friends you have discussed these matters with are far from typical of the majority of staff in our schools, who are dedicated and professional hard workers, who well and truly earn the few extra privileges our profession enjoys over other streams of work. Whilst pay levels are certainly an issue – they are hardly the main drive for teachers to move out of the profession… nor are they a great contributing factor to drawing suitable people in. To cheapen the profession by tarring us all with the “you couldn’t possibly expect to be paid like REAL workers” brush is far from fair or reasonable, as teachers work just as hard and as many hours as anyone else earning the same, and generally more, pay… and they do this usually in conditions that no other Public Servant would be prepared to work in or under.

SIGH, and here I was thinking that we’d gone past this. OK you don’t have to believe me that I have teacher friends. Just like I don’t have to believe that you have ever been in the teaching profession. Just like I don’t have to believe that all teachers are “dedicated and professional hard workers, who well and truly earn the few extra privileges our profession enjoys”. At the end of the day though this is still a he said she said situation. However, I’d side with my friends views over yours any day because:
1. I know my friends, I know they actually teach and that seemed quite genuine with what they said. Whereas I simply don’t know you.
2. There were multiple friends that were teachers I asked whilst you are one person.
3. My friends never once questioned the opposing opinion let alone insulted people like you for having those opinions. Whereas all through your threads you seem to need to resort to childish insults, questioning the existence of my friends and throwaway lines like: “Well they are obviously abnormal”.

I personally have the opinion that teachers have challenging jobs. However, it’s no more challenging than many other professions in the community. It is also an important job but no more important than a lot of other jobs out there. What I don’t like is the victim mentality of some teachers (NOT all teachers) that insist they are underpaid for what they do, they work the same hours over a year as those working 51 weeks a year and have appalling conditions compared to everyone else. Isn’t it an insult to those workers to have people asking for the same wage but with an additional 12 weeks a year off? Isn’t it an insult to those people that have truly stressful and appalling jobs?

I also don’t like this idea that if people like me say “I believe teachers are paid fairly for the work they do” then we are somehow tarnishing the industry and causing people to leave. I agree the “REAL workers” comment was a little low and I apologise for that. But suggesting that people are leaving because people like me are degrading their job is pretty far fetched don’t you think?

Anyway I’m sure I’ve opened myself to the mullahs again. Say what you will I’m too busy and too bored to care anymore. So unless some huge revelation comes along with more than opinions then I guess I’m sticking to my opinion. I will say this though. Given that my opinion matches the current level of teacher’s wages someone else out there must also think it’s fair too.

Gerry-Built 5:08 pm 23 Oct 10

BerraBoy68 said :

All in all it seems that the teaching profession is in a lot of trouble and its going to get worse.

…and keeping the wages of the teaching profession at a level, where at the top of the scale a Classroom Teacher cannot make as much as a top of the scale APS6 will help improve teacher recruitment quality, how, exactly?

I am all for holding PD opportunities during school holiday periods (or after school hours – which I always try for)… It takes as long to prepare a meaningful lesson for a class as it takes to deliver them (probably why your children are seeing videos). Additionally, relief staff often don’t cover the material left anyway.

The last EBA ensured that the relief teacher pool (certainly at the Secondary level) dried up by redirecting teacher resourcing back into “internal relief” (where existing F/T teachers now cover absent teachers wherever possible). It meant that for many relief teachers, their “back-up jobs” became their primary source of income, or that they had to search for more reliable sources of income (ie the APS).

I would also contend that the state of resourcing, and in particular, the physical state of school buildings, is extremely demoralising for the existing workforce, yet alone retention of new staff. For example, I’ve not yet worked in a school that did not have a serious leaky roof (I’m talking water building up in roof cavities, or literally streaming down walls), or where I didn’t have to partially supply my own furnishings. Whilst DET continues to include infrastructure, OH&S and building resources as part of “School Based Management”, school buildings will continue to fall into such a state of disrepair, that the only alternative will be to bulldoze and rebuild, such as the former Ginninderra High School and Kambah High School.

BerraBoy68 10:00 am 23 Oct 10

As a parent, one of the things that is really starting to make my blood boil is that teachers are taking several days out of the classroom each term to attend courses. Then, as a result of the general shortage of teachers in the ACT, the school can’t get replacements for these teachers so kids have to be farmed off to other classes (sometimes higher grades, sometime lower) with a pre-prepared task sheet to complete (which my 8 year old seems to be able to knock-off before recess). What’s this doing to their education?

I just can’t understand why, with 12 weeks leave a year, teachers can’t attend courses during the ‘holidays’ instead of on a school day! Perhaps they could then argue that by giving up one or two weeks ‘leave’ to do these professional courses they should get a pay rise.

Another issue seems to be a general dumbing down in the classroom. My kids frequently come home telling us they watched a movie at school and after questioning we find it’s normally a Disney or pixar DVD. Where’s the educational content and why don’t the teachers use that time to do more math, english or some basic science? I had to pick up the kids early a few weeks back and found my year 1 child’s class watching a DVD of a woman reading a book! Why couldn’t the teacher read one to them?

Finally, a close friend is current studying to become a primary teacher and she showed me some of the comments being posted by her university classmates in their wiki pages. Many of them don’t seem to be able to spell or, in some cases, even form a coherent sentence. I pity the kids that get these people as their teachers in a few years time.

All in all it seems that the teaching profession is in a lot of trouble and its going to get worse.

Gerry-Built 10:40 pm 22 Oct 10

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JohnKnox – correct me if I am misrepresenting you here, but, my understanding is that you believe that teachers have 12 weeks leave a year (during which time they don’t really have to do anything) and are only required to work from 9am – 3pm – is this correct?

Clearly:

JohnKnox said :

1) Does most the workforce get school holidays off as well as their standard annual, sick leave etc? No yet teachers get this bonus leave.

Gerry-Built 10:27 pm 22 Oct 10

Gerry-Built said :

JohnKnox said :

Well obviously you dont know me. Because I actually know a number of people in the teaching profession. That’s where my facts come from.

Feel free to share with us all, some of the ‘facts’ of the luxurious conditions your teacher friends are have regaled you with…

…so go ahead… regale away… ‘facts’ aplenty…

11

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2019 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site