The ACT Government will have “more to say” later this week after it received its ‘please explain’ response from the Canberra Insitute of Technology over millions of dollars in contracts awarded to a single consultant late yesterday (14 June).
The ACT Government confirmed it has received an explanation from the institute but those documents have yet to be made public.
More information is expected later in the week.
News broke last week that CIT had awarded multiple extremely difficult-to-understand and buzzword-filled contracts to “systems and complexity thinker” Patrick Hollingworth. One contract cost ACT taxpayers almost $5 million.
It was then revealed that not only did Minister for Skills Chris Steel question previous arrangements between Mr Hollingworth and the institute in March last year, but Chief Minister Andrew Barr’s office had also been warned about them as early as 2019.
Mr Steel said last week he would be prepared to take further action against CIT if it was discovered that proper procurement processes had not been followed.
But CIT has defended its actions and chief executive Leanne Cover told ABC Radio she was confident the contracts represented “value for money”.
In the last five years, CIT has awarded contracts worth $8.87 million to Mr Hollingworth’s companies. The last of these, awarded in March this year, came in just $10 short of the threshold at which it would have been required to go before the government’s procurement board.
That contract said CIT sought to “further progress the evolution of its complex adaptive systems informed approach to CIT’s transformation, from its initial exploration, designing and testing phases” and it would do this by “establish[ing] and self–sustain practices that allow for iterative learning cycles across a range of temporal (weeks, months, years and decades) and spatial (individuals, teams, departments, colleges/divisions) scales”.
Labor and the Greens have since urged the ACT’s auditor-general to look into the contracts and Mr Steel wrote to the CIT board chair Craig Sloan seeking a jargon-free explanation for the latest contract.
Aside from a vague comprehension that the contracts were awarded to provide mentoring advice to Ms Cover, Mr Steel wasn’t able to provide more detail on where the almost $5 million had gone.
His letter, therefore, asked for justification for why “such a large quantum of funding [had] been used for change management services of this nature”.
Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee, who last week moved a no-confidence motion in Mr Steel, has again put pressure on Mr Steel and Mr Barr to “tell the public everything they know about the CIT consulting contracts”.
She described the response from the Chief Minister and Minister for Skills as having been “grossly inadequate” so far.
“It is now a week since this issue came to light and we are yet to hear anything of substance from the ACT Labor-Greens government,” Ms Lee said.
“Canberrans are rightly shocked and outraged at this gross misuse of taxpayer money and the Chief Minister must step up and show some leadership.”
Ms Lee last week said the “dodgy” contracts were once again proof of the “culture of secrecy” being fostered by Mr Barr’s government.
Earlier this year, she called for an independent audit of all procurement decisions made by the ACT Government over the past five years.
Mr Steel last week said the government was not defending the contracts and he did want answers, confirming he’d only become aware of the contract on Monday.
But he argued that the correct processes had been followed in terms of not informing his office. He also noted the CIT board operates under a governing board and executive that is external to government, therefore, he did not have oversight of the day-to-day delivery of CIT operations.
Mr Hollingworth’s company Think Garden has been contacted for comment and CIT has been asked for a copy of the advice it has sent in response to Mr Steel’s letter.