Crime falls in the cold midwinter

In relation to reported assaults and sexual assaults the statistics reveal that for the period Jan-Sep 2012 there has been a reduction of 15% for both compared to 2011 which is encouraging This is comparable when one takes an average from 2008-2011 for the same period ie. Jan-Sep which shows that the reduction is 14&10% respectively,so while obviously still not acceptable,at least it’s a step in the right direction.

It is a bit of an unusual phenomenon here in that this post has news of a positive for the greater good of the community. Crime is down according to these figures. It can’t be a bad thing surely. You wouldn’t think so with the amount of animosity and antagonistic undertones in some of the posts. Whilst I have been an offender in poor debating also , I think there seems to be a lot of people simply hoping to come off the wittier or have more knowledge on a topic making the others look lesser informed , rather than try to support a perspective with quality examples and references to help communicate their views in the strongest and clearest manner. It is , believe it or not, ok to have a difference of opinion and although I am shocked at some views expressed in some posts, it is a good thing to be discussing things which occur around us. Its easy to spit out a whole bunch of ill thought about babble, I do it constantly. And I expect to be ignored or laughed at immediately. “Cops are all corrupt no good bullies” Oh really? All of them? Odd, can we ask where the evidence is to support this claim? ” Get fucked dick face”. Is about how it sounds sometimes.

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

First sensible thing you’ve ever said, Tooks.

With all the modern technology at our disposal, it’s wonder we don’t already have zero crime.
Maybe….some people are worried they’d be out of a job if all the crime was solved?
Maybe….drug dealers would go out of business if all the house breakers were rounded up?
Maybe….drug dealers have more say in the current performance of law enforcement than is generally advertised?

So that’s one more sensible comment than you’ve ever made. Winning.

I see you’re not getting any better at trolling.

Have you ever thought about the extent of the economic effect that would ensue if all the petty criminals that form the consumer base for the illegal drug industry in this country were rounded up and prevented from committing any further crime?

Because if you haven’t, you can bet your bottom dollar those responsible for the deployment of police resources are very much aware of what would happen to them if they were to deny the drug industry access to its consumers.

This fishy ain’t biting. I can spot your bait a mile away. You’re not as subtle as you think you are.

Let’s take a short quiz:

Police corruption is:

a/ – real. There are police officers that take money from drug dealers.
or
b/ – a fantasy – there is no such thing as a corrupt policeman who takes money from drug dealers

Ignoring Mark Standen for the moment, let’s go back to Roger Rogerson – there was a copper who was an integral part of a drug syndicate. Along with many other coppers who were in with him or just scared of him into doing his bidding. His drug money was so powerful that it bought politicians and judges. Laws were written at his behest. Trials went the way he wanted them to. Members of Australia’s intelligence community were threatened by him. This is a man who was the biggest threat to Australian national security since dodgy Doc Evatt and the pervert arsehole in charge of Foreign affairs tried to bend this country over for a good soviet rogering.
And all because of the drug business.

What a terrible character assassination of the ‘dodger’ given he was one of the most decorated officers, having received at least 13 awards for bravery, outstanding policemanship and devotion to duty including the Peter Mitchell Trophy, the highest annual police award.

Next thing you’ll be telling us that Winchester was crooked,Eastman didn’t kill him and that Berlusconi has a penchant for young sex workers! 🙂

Tooks said :

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

First sensible thing you’ve ever said, Tooks.

With all the modern technology at our disposal, it’s wonder we don’t already have zero crime.
Maybe….some people are worried they’d be out of a job if all the crime was solved?
Maybe….drug dealers would go out of business if all the house breakers were rounded up?
Maybe….drug dealers have more say in the current performance of law enforcement than is generally advertised?

So that’s one more sensible comment than you’ve ever made. Winning.

I see you’re not getting any better at trolling.

Have you ever thought about the extent of the economic effect that would ensue if all the petty criminals that form the consumer base for the illegal drug industry in this country were rounded up and prevented from committing any further crime?

Because if you haven’t, you can bet your bottom dollar those responsible for the deployment of police resources are very much aware of what would happen to them if they were to deny the drug industry access to its consumers.

This fishy ain’t biting. I can spot your bait a mile away. You’re not as subtle as you think you are.

Let’s take a short quiz:

Police corruption is:

a/ – real. There are police officers that take money from drug dealers.
or
b/ – a fantasy – there is no such thing as a corrupt policeman who takes money from drug dealers

Ignoring Mark Standen for the moment, let’s go back to Roger Rogerson – there was a copper who was an integral part of a drug syndicate. Along with many other coppers who were in with him or just scared of him into doing his bidding. His drug money was so powerful that it bought politicians and judges. Laws were written at his behest. Trials went the way he wanted them to. Members of Australia’s intelligence community were threatened by him. This is a man who was the biggest threat to Australian national security since dodgy Doc Evatt and the pervert arsehole in charge of Foreign affairs tried to bend this country over for a good soviet rogering.
And all because of the drug business.

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

First sensible thing you’ve ever said, Tooks.

With all the modern technology at our disposal, it’s wonder we don’t already have zero crime.
Maybe….some people are worried they’d be out of a job if all the crime was solved?
Maybe….drug dealers would go out of business if all the house breakers were rounded up?
Maybe….drug dealers have more say in the current performance of law enforcement than is generally advertised?

So that’s one more sensible comment than you’ve ever made. Winning.

I see you’re not getting any better at trolling.

Have you ever thought about the extent of the economic effect that would ensue if all the petty criminals that form the consumer base for the illegal drug industry in this country were rounded up and prevented from committing any further crime?

Because if you haven’t, you can bet your bottom dollar those responsible for the deployment of police resources are very much aware of what would happen to them if they were to deny the drug industry access to its consumers.

This fishy ain’t biting. I can spot your bait a mile away. You’re not as subtle as you think you are.

Tooks said :

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

First sensible thing you’ve ever said, Tooks.

With all the modern technology at our disposal, it’s wonder we don’t already have zero crime.
Maybe….some people are worried they’d be out of a job if all the crime was solved?
Maybe….drug dealers would go out of business if all the house breakers were rounded up?
Maybe….drug dealers have more say in the current performance of law enforcement than is generally advertised?

So that’s one more sensible comment than you’ve ever made. Winning.

I see you’re not getting any better at trolling.

Have you ever thought about the extent of the economic effect that would ensue if all the petty criminals that form the consumer base for the illegal drug industry in this country were rounded up and prevented from committing any further crime?

Because if you haven’t, you can bet your bottom dollar those responsible for the deployment of police resources are very much aware of what would happen to them if they were to deny the drug industry access to its consumers.

HenryBG said :

Tooks said :

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

First sensible thing you’ve ever said, Tooks.

With all the modern technology at our disposal, it’s wonder we don’t already have zero crime.
Maybe….some people are worried they’d be out of a job if all the crime was solved?
Maybe….drug dealers would go out of business if all the house breakers were rounded up?
Maybe….drug dealers have more say in the current performance of law enforcement than is generally advertised?

So that’s one more sensible comment than you’ve ever made. Winning.

I see you’re not getting any better at trolling.

Tooks said :

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

First sensible thing you’ve ever said, Tooks.

With all the modern technology at our disposal, it’s wonder we don’t already have zero crime.
Maybe….some people are worried they’d be out of a job if all the crime was solved?
Maybe….drug dealers would go out of business if all the house breakers were rounded up?
Maybe….drug dealers have more say in the current performance of law enforcement than is generally advertised?

screaming banshee said :

Tell that to the 478 people that were assaulted in the last 3 month period, or the 56 that reported a sexual assault, or the 200+ that had their car stolen.

Yes, crime should be zero, or it’s just not good enough!

Don’t get too smug,that will all change as the lizards start to get the blood flowing come summer.