5 October 2006

Department of Education has another go with essential learning

| johnboy
Join the conversation
28

The Canberra Times informs us that the Department of Education has trimmed back its laundry list of “essential learning achievements” from 36 to 26.

“visualise, and create and use visualisations” has been given the arse, but “manage self and relationships” (they can teach that? really?) remains alongside less objectionable material as reading and writing.

20 Canberra schools are getting this forced down their throats next year and I would not be surprised if private sector enrollments were to rise off the back of it.

Join the conversation

28
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Thumper, seepi and VY thanks for that – looking at a few jobs now.

VY, no students don’t fail and they are rarely held back a year. It’s a bloody joke.

Education is the main focus of the ACT Dept of Education, it’s more about what you can do for yourself rather than what is in the best interests of the students.

Nyssa – I have (and have had) many PS clients. Looking at the PS from a distance, they’re a mixed bunch. There are some folk who work hard but get treated like crap, plenty of people who do nothing. There are some PS jobs, though, where the people work hard while they’re at the office, but don’t go past about 35 hours a week or so. I’d be looking for one of those myself. I have also noticed that there are lots of PS people who aren’t particularly interested in career progression, so if that’s your thing there is lots of opportunity.

On the whole, there are lots of good PS jobs around. There are also some stinkers. Talk to people you know for referrals to the ‘better’ areas.

Nyssa there are an awful lot of ex-teachers in the PS.
In my expereince PS jobs are quite mixed. In great big departments life is a bit easier, people don’t tend to work thru lunch/stay late etc, but it can be frustrating as nothing much gets done, due to the layers and layers of management approvals things have to go thru.
In very small PS workplaces you may as well be in the private sector as resources are scarce and long hours are the norm. But life is more interesting, and you can actually make a difference. That’s been my experience after working in two large depts and two small PS agencies.

Given that in terms of education and earning power on average Canberrans are pretty much the top of Australia, I’m surprised more emphasis isn’t put on education. I grew up in the NSW system, which although less friendly is quite concrete. Also, do students ‘fail’ these days? Can students be held back a year if they don’t achieve enough marks? Does this happen in practice? Nyssa or anyone else know?

Parents want to know the tangibles being taught, and how. Eg, algebra. Sure, there are potential flow-on effects, (eg logical thinking) but these are not what I would expect in a curriculum.Compare it to for example music lessons: the child must be taught certain tangible things, practise (do homework) and be able to demonstrate certain levels of achievement in order to pass a level. Tangibles: what is taught and how. Flow on: creativity, self discipline, self-esteem, sense of achievement, etc. Same goes for sport – we expect a certain standard to qualify for a particular level. Frankly this is so obvious.

Self-discipline is the biggest oxymoron in Education today.

Yes the three “R’s” are included, it’s a basic neccessity. However, it is covered in PC shite.

Outcomes based education has proven to be shite, yet we still have it here in the ACT. Why in the hell are we still flogging a dead horse?

It should be pointed out that reading, writing and arithmetic are in the listed criteria.

Which you’d know, if you cliked on the damn link that’s in the article. I know you all have a ludicrous amount of faith in your ability to know everything, but really, occasionally looking at the actual document being quoted tells you a whole lot more.

And yes, there’s a lot of fluffy management speak in there, but there’s a lot less than there used to be. And in case you’re wondering, the expression “manage self and relationships” would be another phrase for “Self discipline”.

I’m giving serious consideration to leaving education.

The new curriculum is shite, all the good teachers leave due to the arseholes who are never reprimanded, school closures and a shite staffing sector.

Thumper, is the PS any good?

As if teachers have time to read such waffle anyway. What a waste of trees and department staff.

As for the new outcomes: no wonder people spend so much on Kip McGrath/Kumon etc – who of course implement (at a price) the traditional teaching methods we want the schools to teach. I’d love to know the breakdown of students getting tutoring (especially how many high-achieving ones). The ACT Ed system just loves the kudos but . . .

Not to mention, of course what parents do to help their own children. (I taught one of my own children to read in her Kinder year, thanks to an excellent phonics course I had undertaken at a previous NSW school. She was struggling big-time and getting nowhere with the ‘have a go’ (have a guess) method.) Nyssa, your daughter will surely be fine, as you will be keeping a good eye on things. It’s the parents who are completely relying on the school that will be let down, especially if they can’t afford tutoring.

Oops, I forgot to add, that this crap comes into effect in January 2008.

It will be interesting (in a sad way) to see how those children starting Kindy in that year (my youngest included) develop in the 12 years they are in school.

miz, when I started at my current school, I found EVERY copy (from a staffroom of 15) in the recycling bin.

I was asked if I wanted to participate in the “hashing out” of the new curriculum. I said hell no as all it does is dumb down the students.

Needless to say there are a few ppl in the Dept that have me on their hit list….well amongst other things. I won’t hold my tongue :P~

The new curriculum is shite. We should use the NSW documents as they at least are better designed than the current and future documents.

Honestly it’s a waste of time and money. Just think how much money it cost to print those damn booklets and they ended up in the trash.

Fluffy outcomes = a desperate government trying to look like they are actually DOING something in Education. I call it ‘how to drive people away’ from what was once a good system, specifically before Self Govt (in fact, it was even better in the 1970s before separation from NSW, according to my father, who worked in the Department then).

A family member currently in the ACT public high school system advises anonymously that these kinds of publications are useful only as literal doorstops! They mostly get ignored.

Nothing wrong with the baby bonus. It’s all good as far as I see it.

Absent Diane4:48 pm 05 Oct 06

it says that the current system is failing and badly. There should be an aim for 100% literacy with fully abled students.

what does that say about the education standards??

My partner completed year 12 without being able to read and write properly! What the..??!!
I think that is disgraceful!
He is a trademan and can read and write basic stuff, but not well enough to avoid embarrassing situations.

Absent Diane4:23 pm 05 Oct 06

its liyke when you dun look in a mirra or a riva.

Oh, I never dune got learnded that word at school. What’s it mean?

Absent Diane4:18 pm 05 Oct 06

well actually I said selfsih… so I wouldnt be too offended 🙂

Hey AD, I take offence to that: I am not selfish! 🙂

Absent Diane4:14 pm 05 Oct 06

hold isnt it dumb/ignorant/selfsih types that typically vote for liberal??

Thumper, there are far too many clever people in Canberra: the place needs a bit of dumbing-down.

Although, Canberrans do tend to be Labor voters, so maybe there aren’t as many intelligent people here as I thought!

Absent Diane2:14 pm 05 Oct 06

I swear that collectively our (local and federal)policiticans are trying turn australia into a bogan state (to put it nicely trying to create a larger lower class and therefore a welfare state). This coupled with that stupid baby bonus crap, its not looking so good.

James-T-Kirk2:07 pm 05 Oct 06

One day, i will look up the name of the Federal Education minister who gave a speech (I believe at Bruce TAFE) where he mentioned that “Australias chilcren need to reduce their expectations if Australia is to compete with Asia”

Wow, Gosh, Looks like the department has found a way to allow competition after all.

Would you like fries with that?

You want to know where most of the Essential Learnings stuff handed out to ACT Teachers went?

In the bin.

It’s a load of crap. One “outcome” for all students, with small parts for each “level” to be achieved.

The “outcomes” are written as if they are for primary students but will also need to cover high school students.

Stupid ACT Dept.

Absent Diane12:05 pm 05 Oct 06

I know that school needs reforming but this seems a little ridiculous.

I always thought ongoing aptitude tests from an early age were a good idea. If someone shows a strong aptitude for english but no so much maths.. they are put into classes which will best suit their learning methods for each learning stream.

Couple this with teachers who are better at teaching in certain ways and you have a much better system.

Jesus, they really are trying to dumb down society even further, aren’t they!

“McLeod’s Daughters” and “Home and Away” will be compulsory subjects at school before we know it.

Whatever happened to reading, writing and arithmetic (the three ‘r’s)?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.