3 March 2006

Education pay dispute reaches its endgame

| johnboy
Join the conversation
25

The Canberra Times has coverage of the latest teacher’s pay dispute.

The Liberal’s Richard Mulcahy is showing the human side of right wing politics in calling for higher pay for people who do valuable jobs.

As long as we have no way to reward (or even identify) teachers who are perfoming better than others, this is going to remain a vexed issue.

UPDATED: Katy Gallagher has put out a media release on the race to the top with a committment to make sure our teachers are the highest paid in Australia.

Well, it’s what the people want.

FURTHER UPDATE: The ABC is now reporting that the teachers want more, as is the Canberra Times.

Join the conversation

25
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Chalker has a point re: teaching out of your “expertise”. I’m primary trained, teaching High School English, SOSE, Maths, RE, Art, Japanese, ESL and Food Tech.

After teaching a “subject” for one year the ACT Department deems that you are “suitable” to teach it from here to eternity.

I even retrained in maths, with other teachers, and 70% of us still teach maths after 18 months.

I don’t believe in stop work meetings. Then again, I don’t have a high opinion of Clive Haggar, but that’s beside the point.

They are trying to get the most money for the senior teachers before they retire. It isn’t to attract new teachers as the conditions are still shite (IMO) to support new teachers, irrespective of the new “changes” they have implemented.

That comment did sound like I was hacking out on teachers – sorry; it wasn’t meant to. Not having kids, and being fairly thoroughly out of secondary education, I’m not the best informed in the area.

I’m just a cynic encouraging a healty debate 😉

[link]
was the pay scales page.

Yes, that should have been ones, not one’s.

Mr_Shab, we do currently have teacher shortages, so it is not rhetoric at all. About the only teachers which are not in short supply are PE teachers, and so you have PE trained teachers having to teach subjects outside their area, like Science, Maths, Technology (not to say that PE teachers are bad teachers, just that this is not what they were trained to teach). It took three weeks after the term started this year for our school to fill a Science and a Drama position (actually I don’t think the Drama position has even been filled yet – there’s an English teacher taking it in fact). This was months after the dept knew these positions were needed.
What I think Nyssa means is that the teacher shortage will become worse, and we won’t be able to get any teachers to fill some positions, even one’s outside their area.

Beginning teacher on $43073 for 3yrs, or $46565 for 4yrs trained. Top classroom teacher $66353, Top principal $107799. So those classroom teacher figures you heard on ABC were a bit higher than reality.

You can look at the pay scales here:
(apologies, I don’t know html to put that in a link).

The gov’ment have already knocked back a proposal to create a Master Teacher level which would extend the pay bands for classroom teachers.

As far as work stoppages go, work to rule simply doesn’t IMO produce the required level of media coverage to get the gov’ments attention. It would (again IMO) go on far longer and result in much greater losses to students educational outcomes than a half-day stoppage which is what is currently under proposal by the union.

It is already difficult for the ACT to recruit new teahcers – NSW makes better offers, and so for that matter does private schools. One example (and I’m sure there are more): New teacher offered 6 month contract (rated highly competent btw) by ACT, private school offers permanency and higher pay / better conditions. Which do you think they took?

With respect, Nyssa – I think I heard the same rhetoric about teacher shortages in 5-10 years 5-10 years ago.

The people who leave most of the jobs I can think of in the greatest numbers tend to do so within their first 5 years.

I can see it happening though…..teachers going to NSW because they can get more money.

The ACT will have a major shortage in the next 5-10yrs. The people who tend to leave the job the most are those who have under 5yrs of teaching experience.

The people who “voted” in the majority for the strike are those who are 45+ years old and make up 55% of the teaching population. They want more money as the pay scale stops at 8-10yrs and they either 1) don’t want to apply for promotional positions or 2) don’t want to leave the system that gives them what they want.

Teachers under 5yrs out in the last EBA got less than those who had been in the system 8+ yrs (in the % of rise).

Atm, a first year out teacher is on $46K in both the Govt and Non-Govt system. The figures you are citing Mr_Shab are the payscales that the AEU hopes to attain.

At least with that industrial action they don’t just walk out on the kids. They give plenty of due notice to parents, at least whenever the other half has been involved they have. I’m sure theres something somewhere where kids were left hanging.

Ta random. I’d be happy to hear the actual numbers. As I said – heard it on ABC.

I think you misunderstood my first remark about getting out of the classroom random. It was meant tongue in cheek but whatever…I hope they do get a payrise but I don’t agree with them taking industrial action on the scale proposed

Shab, that last post was for Swaggie, damn post timing.

As for those salaries you mentioned, no. The starting and ongoing salaries you mentioned are not even slightly accurate. I’ll get some numbers for you.

So you advocate moving away from the problem rather than solve it? Just walk out of an industry that is already short staffed?

Wheres the social responsibility in that? This isn’t a factory hand job or some ditch digging malarky. There is a duty of care involved to other peoples children which the vast majority of teachers take very seriously.

If only they were paid for the job they do Swaggie. If only. Thats what the issue is. Painting them under the genral ‘union theif’ or ‘lazy whinger’ banner isn’t going to work here because they aren’t on 80,000 for operating a dock crane.

For all you teachers and ex-teachers out there, I’ve got a question about teacher’s pay.

I heard on the ABC that a graduate teacher starts off on around 50K, and a top-level classroom teacher gets about $72K.

Now, 50K is pretty good money for a newbie. I don’t know any other graduate jobs in the ACT that pay that kind of money.

However, if the top level is only 72K, you don’t have much financial incentive to keep on performing, improving your skills and moving up.

Does the thought restructuring the teachers’ salary system by widening the range of pay grades (say…40K to 85K…) seem like a better way of providing some financial (and maybe performance-based) incentives in teacher’s career development?

Or are Thumper, Nyssa et al going to tear me a new proverbial?

If things are that bad in the classroom Random it’s time to get out of teaching…. Yes fight back, work to rule, organise a protest march on a Saturday outside Katy’s house (ooeerr a protest in your own time eh? – There’s a novel idea) but do the job you’re paid for.

Ahh Random. You are a star.

“if you can’t get what you want throw a dummy spit until you get it”.

A more accurate analogy is:

If you are getting ass raped, fight back.

I saw somewhere the other day (is that vague enough) that the average Australian wage was $54K per year.

If the only way teachers are getting a fair go is by going on strike then they should. If teachers didn’t take industrial action they would get screwed everytime.

They spend a lot of that holiday on courses and working on lesson plans. And if I had to teach some of those little shits, I’d need a 6 week holiday too, and probably spend at least 5 weeks of it either drunk or in therapy.

teachers and productivity… does that mean cutting back the six week holiday to five weeks ?

Fully support that they should be well paid but NOT industrial action – it’s not the example to set the kids – it besically says “if you can’t get what you want throw a dummy spit until you get it”. By all means work to rule and don’t compile the endless streams of paperwork and stats they have to supply for the local Government. Don’t organise the out of school activities but DO teach the kids. I admire the teachers at my kid’s school but I don’t want to see them walk off the job. They’ll lose my trust, my support and my faith in them.

Teachers are absolutely invaluable. They spend as much time raising our kids (in primary school at least, where there is same teacher all year) as most parents do. They deal with many different kids, with different needs, and some who are downright disgusting (I could name 2 in my daughter’s class right off the bat).

I have always supported every request for a pay increase, and every industrial action they take to get one, and will continue to do so.

Disclaimer: I am not, have never been, and never had an desire to be, a teacher.

given that even graduate teachers are now pushing into the upper limits of the tax system I think pay rises in exchange for increased productivity are a recipe for disaster.

They’ll have to work a lot harder for money which the goubbmint will steal half of.

Improving conditions has to be the way forward surely?

Pay rise offer 3%. Rest of public sector 4.2% average. CPI last year 3.1%.
Not only is this offer well below the rest of the public sector, but below the CPI, so in effect it’s going backwards.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.