Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Flame of the Week – The palm tree flamer speaks

By johnboy - 15 May 2009 23

We’ve all missed quality flaming of late.

So many thanks to The Arsonist for this effort on the subject of the palm tree fires:

    #13 posted by The Arsonist
    (Newbie)
    12:12, 15 May 2009

    Oh my goD. I am so sorry for the grief i have caused all of you.

    NOT IT WAS F***ING SICK TORCHING YOUR 10,000 DOLLAR TREES!!!

Congratulations The Arsonist, you’re the flame of the week. I hope that makes you happy.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
23 Responses to
Flame of the Week – The palm tree flamer speaks
Danman 1:44 pm 15 May 09

Cue scenes of “Full House” eh feathergirl ?

Woody Mann-Caruso 1:43 pm 15 May 09

Arsonists are usually compensating for something. What might you be compensating for by lighting up long, straight, erect trees?

Feathergirl 1:41 pm 15 May 09

Who still says *NOT* to signify their statement is sarcastic? I suspect the culprit is a time traveller from the early 90s.

ant 1:38 pm 15 May 09

Someone might even do a poem…

pptvb 1:12 pm 15 May 09

mmm so many tangents,
This could go anywhere.

screaming banshee 1:07 pm 15 May 09

dvaey said :

Same theory that ruins your life for having group-sex, but lets you out on bail for kidnap and assault.

And you dont have to wait for 7 years to be let out on bail

dvaey 12:54 pm 15 May 09

caf said :

I am intrigued by a moral theory whereby arson is acceptable, but saying “F.UCK” in public is not.

Same theory that ruins your life for having group-sex, but lets you out on bail for kidnap and assault.

caf 12:48 pm 15 May 09

The point is moot, because if you read the updates in the linked RiotACT story on the fires, you’ll find that the offenders were identified, arrested and fronted court already.

johnboy 12:48 pm 15 May 09

Anyway my understanding in this case is that the culprits have been apprehended.

VYBerlinaV8_the_one_ 12:46 pm 15 May 09

We respect the privacy of all our contributors SB.

If the police want that detail badly enough they have legal means with which to request it.

Even when a poster effectively admits to committing a crime?

Of course, there’s no real way of telling whether the loser who wrote this rant was really the tree-torcher, or some blow-in trolling.

screaming banshee 12:41 pm 15 May 09

Fair point JB

caf 12:40 pm 15 May 09

I am intrigued by a moral theory whereby arson is acceptable, but saying “F.UCK” in public is not.

ant 12:40 pm 15 May 09

Snap, banshee. I was just suggesting we all club together and influence the RA owners with money to reveal its IP.

johnboy 12:39 pm 15 May 09

We respect the privacy of all our contributors SB.

If the police want that detail badly enough they have legal means with which to request it.

screaming banshee 12:37 pm 15 May 09

So jb, has the IP been appropriately forwarded?

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site