27 July 2011

Friday dog crackdown

| johnboy
Join the conversation
29

Territory And Municipal Services are warning dog owners to take out extra plastic bags on Friday as Domestic Animal Services and ACT Policing combine to conduct a crackdown:

“The operation will take place in several areas of Canberra where there has been issues reported to us by the community,” Registrar, Domestic Animal Services, Peter Dinan said.

“This includes particular suburbs, parks and nature reserve areas. The crackdown is part of an ongoing partnership between Domestic Animal Services and the police and is the third joint operation to be conducted this year.

The infringements and fines under the microscope are:

    — Keeping an unregistered dog $150
    — Dog not on a leash in a public place $150
    — Keeping dog not de-sexed without a permit $75
    — Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75
    — Not carrying equipment for removal of faeces $5

Join the conversation

29
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

gorinosho said :

Dog turds are being left in public places to protest the banning of supermarket plastic bags. It’s just like Kony 2012 only more subversive and retro.

Have you noticed that instead of neat and not so neat piles of dog droppings being left lying around, they now come packaged as people pick up but then leave the now wrapped contents hidden, or not, at the base of trees, up trees, under bushes, in long grass…At least dog droppings are organic and disintegrate fairly rapidly.

Dog turds are being left in public places to protest the banning of supermarket plastic bags. It’s just like Kony 2012 only more subversive and retro.

Shullerina said :

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This frustrates me. Over the years we have replaced our yellow tags over and over. We have two labradors who drag each other around the yard by their collars… how are these tags supposed to survive that? The person who came up plastic rego tags for dogs can’t have been a dog owner…

We don’t keep a collar on our dog. When I take it for walks I slip it into the harness whihc has the tag.

Our dog never runs away, and is microchipped.

* came up with…

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This frustrates me. Over the years we have replaced our yellow tags over and over. We have two labradors who drag each other around the yard by their collars… how are these tags supposed to survive that? The person who came up plastic rego tags for dogs can’t have been a dog owner…

billiow said :

The current laws regarding dogs in the ACT are not based on any logic, research or rational argument. They are simply based on the extreme views of a few who would rather have a nanny state that tells everyone what to do – so we all do very little.

Seems like most of the rules logical to me that off-leash dogs can and do cause harm, to people, to other dogs, to cyclists, to wildlife, etc. There are plenty of safe areas provided for off-leash exercise and they were dramatically expanded several years ago.
Registration and microchipping, surely obvious to locate the owners of animals. I can’t understand why dog owners find the laws, which are not onerous, so difficult to follow. It’s for everybody’s safety and enjoyment.

billiow said :

Research reports suggest more and more that those who own animals have a greater level of empathy toward others. Those that don’t are more likely to carry out anti-social and selfish behaviour.

You should have a look into that cause and effect thing sometime.

Research reports suggest more and more that those who own animals have a greater level of empathy toward others. Those that don’t are more likely to carry out anti-social and selfish behaviour.

Has the government bothered to do any research into the economic or social implications of this issue versus the others issues they should be focusing on. Of course not, this is a knee jerk reactionist government who falls over to those who whinge the loudest or who pays the most.

if we are to become a more tolerant, understanding and accepting society we need to be fostering animal ownership and treating those animals on an equal basis in regards to freedom, excerise and providing a means to explore and be curious.

To not understand this and continually apply rule after rule is ultra conservative right wing behaviour that leads us all into a future where our freedoms are destroyed and controlled by a minority few who have no empathey, understanding or tolerance for others. These are the people who should have more exposure to animals and especially dogs.

The current laws regarding dogs in the ACT are not based on any logic, research or rational argument. They are simply based on the extreme views of a few who would rather have a nanny state that tells everyone what to do – so we all do very little.

luther_bendross said :

P Taker said :

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This one is confusing as the registration tag on my dog’s collar broke off and when I called for a replacement I was told they do not give any more out after the first initial tag. They said that is OK though as all information is on the microchip that can be scanned….

You might want to have a look at this.

So what is the point in having dogs microchipped? I was told by DAS that tags were no longer necessary if the dogs were microchipped.

la mente torbida2:02 pm 28 Jul 11

@Classified … ROFLCOPTER

– Keeping an unregistered dog $150
– Dog not on a leash in a public place $150
– Keeping dog not de-sexed without a permit $75
– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75
– Not carrying equipment for removal of faeces $5

…two dogs rooting on the median strip – priceless!

P Taker said :

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This one is confusing as the registration tag on my dog’s collar broke off and when I called for a replacement I was told they do not give any more out after the first initial tag. They said that is OK though as all information is on the microchip that can be scanned….

P Taker said :

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This one is confusing as the registration tag on my dog’s collar broke off and when I called for a replacement I was told they do not give any more out after the first initial tag. They said that is OK though as all information is on the microchip that can be scanned….

Who told you that?

http://www.canberraconnect.act.gov.au/Services/d/dog-tag-yellow-replacement-payment

luther_bendross12:56 pm 28 Jul 11

P Taker said :

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This one is confusing as the registration tag on my dog’s collar broke off and when I called for a replacement I was told they do not give any more out after the first initial tag. They said that is OK though as all information is on the microchip that can be scanned….

You might want to have a look at this.

– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75

This one is confusing as the registration tag on my dog’s collar broke off and when I called for a replacement I was told they do not give any more out after the first initial tag. They said that is OK though as all information is on the microchip that can be scanned….

Pity the CT reporter who took this story didn’t ask Peter Dinan how many fines had already been issued for the offences nominated. My guess is ZIP.
And why has not the new regulation “failing to microchip a pet” been included in the list of infringements?
I just forked out $120 for microchipping my 2 dogs and on checking with friends who also have dogs, none of them are bothereing to do the same. So, what goes on?

luther_bendross11:17 am 28 Jul 11

TAMS should be fined for least user friendly dog map ever.

It’s not that big a deal to carry a couple of plastic bags with you…..

Although someone should let the car drivers on other threads know that the authorities do crack down on offences other than just speeding……

I suspect that poem is really doggerel.

I’m glad they are only cracking down on “Responsible Dog Owners” and not us irresponsible ones.

Why does Dr Suess come to mind – I am dog, dog I am, I am not locked in a yard, nor on tied to a pole, roaming the streets without a collar, plastic bag or control. My balls hang low, I am not neutered nor castrated, look out bitches its going to get x-rated. Who will you fine when you rangers catch me, my owners so irresponsible he’s not even microchipped me.

Dickson Woolies always has a few spare dogs, even some with 2 or 4 legs

The Pooh Police! (they don’t live inside of my head)

I’m glad they’re cracking down on the major issues of the city.

As for Riverside Plaza in Queanbo, they’d have to arrest all the incontinent birds that pooh everywhere, too. I’ve never seen those bastards carrying plastic bags.

kezzafezza said :

It also craps all over our front yard (I have taken to throwing the poo back into their yard, I may or may not have be aiming for their car).

I did had a similar issue with the next door neighbour when we first moved in and half the back fence was missing so his dogs would come and crap in our yard. I just threw the poo back to his side and must admit I was aiming for the back door of his house which is a big glass sliding door. He would come home and there would be poo marks on the door every few days, he must have thought the dogs were wiping thier butts on his glass door.

Aim for the front of the car, you want it to sit on the aircon intake below the windscreen 🙂

I might have to dob my neighbours in. When their little yap yap needs a walk, they just let it out onto the street by itself to run around. I’m surprised it hasn’t been run over yet, we live on a busy main road. It always end up barking at us through our loungeroom window, or barking at our dog through the gate. It also craps all over our front yard (I have taken to throwing the poo back into their yard, I may or may not have be aiming for their car).

Captain RAAF10:25 am 27 Jul 11

troll-sniffer said :

Someone has to ask if this includes Riverside Plaza and Charnwood shops. I’ll be the bunny. Touch paper dry and ready for ignition…

What if you don’t use plastic bags and like to just take the poop home in your pocket? Who are these people to judge what measure YOU should use to pick up poop?

Meanwhile the delightful individuals who punch and/or glass people are likely to get community service orders…Surely the police have more important issues to worry about than whether I forgot a plastic bag for my dog’s poo?

How on earth did that headline get approval? My dog could do better than that, if he was unleashed on DAS.

troll-sniffer10:07 am 27 Jul 11

Someone has to ask if this includes Riverside Plaza and Charnwood shops. I’ll be the bunny. Touch paper dry and ready for ignition…

Lol, JB. I wonder who wrote the headline? Boohoo, I just won’t t my dog out for a walk on Friday.

– Keeping an unregistered dog $150
– Dog not on a leash in a public place $150
– Keeping dog not de-sexed without a permit $75
– Registered dog not wearing registration tag in a public place $75
– Not carrying equipment for removal of faeces $5

So is the misdemeanor not carrying a bag – or not cleaning up the dog crap?

You’ve got to love the headline: “CRACKDOWN ON RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP”

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.