13 July 2021

Gallagher fires shot across Seselja's bow over euthanasia rights law

| Dominic Giannini
Join the conversation
41
Katy Gallagher

ACT Senator Katy Gallagher has called for the reinstatement of the ACT’s right to vote on euthanasia. Photo: Auspic.

ACT Senator and former Chief Minister Katy Gallagher says her Liberal counterpart, Zed Seselja, is failing to put the democratic rights of Territorians ahead of personal ideology under the new Territory rights bill.

Senator Gallagher said Senator Seselja was stubborn for stonewalling a renewed push to give the ACT and Northern Territory the right to legislate on euthanasia.

“Zed Seselja always prioritises his own conservative personal views over the majority views of his electorate,” she said.

“The fact that he is deliberately blocking one of his own Coalition colleagues from including the ACT in a private senators’ bill to restore territory rights is telling about who he’s really in politics for – himself.

“He’s previously been at odds with the majority of Canberrans on key issues like marriage equality or the light rail project, he doesn’t want to see real action on climate change and now he can’t even put his own views aside to protect the democratic rights of ACT residents.”

Senator Gallagher has now launched a petition through her personal website calling for Senator Seselja to support legislation allowing the ACT to legislate on voluntary assisted dying.

“It is not fair that someone who lives in Queanbeyan should have more democratic rights than someone who lives five minutes away in Kingston,” an email from Senator Gallagher to her constituents said.

ACT Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee is also continuing to hold discussions with Senator Seselja over the issue after she, on behalf of the Canberra Liberals, signed a letter to all Australian MPs and Senators requesting the Legislative Assembly’s ability to legislate on voluntary assisted dying be restored.

While views about voluntary assisted dying in the local party room are split, the Canberra Liberals unanimously endorsed the motion to give the ACT to right to vote on the issue.

Zed Seselja

ACT Liberal Senator Zed Seselja does not want the Euthanasia Laws Act to be repealed. Photo: Region Media.

The issue was put back on the table last week when outgoing Coalition Senator for the Northern Territory, Sam McMahon, announced she would move a private member’s bill to reinstate the right to legislate on the issue in the NT after both territories were stripped of the right under the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997.

However, the ACT was left out by Senator McMahon after she said Senator Seselja was “not keen” to include the ACT in the bill.

READ ALSO Is there a pollie out there who can tell the truth and act in the public good?

Senator Seselja has previously stated that he was against reinstating the territories’ right to legislate on the issue as he saw it as a pathway to legalising voluntary assisted dying under the current ACT Government.

Ms McMahon has since said she has received an overwhelming response from people in Canberra who want the ACT added to her bill.

Senators can introduce amendments to the private member’s bill, but it remains unclear if Senator Gallagher will move to add the ACT to the bill.

Senator Gallagher has previously said she would not decide on a bill that had not been drafted yet.

She said it would be a hard path for Senator McMahon’s bill even to make it to debate on the Senate floor after she lost pre-selection and would not be returning after the next election.

READ MORE ACT leaders may take battle for euthanasia laws to the UN

Senator Gallagher introduced a similar bill to the Senate in 2016 which included both territories. It remains on the Notice Paper.

A vote to repeal the laws was narrowly defeated 36 to 34 votes in the Senate in 2018.

Senator Seselja’s office has been contacted for comment in light of the petition. A spokesperson for the Senator previously told Region Media, “the Senator’s views on euthanasia are well known and have not changed”.

Join the conversation

41
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Latest

Hmmm that will work – present Senator Seselja with a petition asking him to do his job and represent the will of the ACT people on VAD rather than follow his religious views. Oh wait – didn’t we try that with the plebiscite on same sex marriage? That went well.
Also I didn’t know that Senator Gallagher introduced a similar, but not yet debated, bill in 2016. So what chance Senator McMahon’s bill will ever see the light of day?
Even if Senator Seselja had the inclination to vote in favour of the bill, he would probably have difficulty getting approval to vote that way from his political masters.
The issue we create for ourselves in Canberra, Is that we continue to elect one Senator of each breed and they cancel each other’s vote – thus making them impotent on Territory rights.
We need two good independents who will be able to use the weight of their vote to the benefit of the ACT. It’s a far cry from politicians actually working for the good of the country but that seems to be the name of the game for independents these days – so ACT should join the parade.
I thought we might have had a chance with Anthony Pesic, who seemed like a credible independent alternative for the right. Unfortunately, he didn’t get up and anyway, I didn’t see any credible independent alternative for the left.

Grumpymark,
We definitely agree on your point around independents and more swing voting and I would say the exact same thing applies at the HOR and Territory level as well.

Far too many rusted on supporters here that lead to some of our governance problems as well as how much we get ignored by all parties because the seats are seen as very safe.

Yes, chewy24, I agree that ideally the ACT should also send independents to the HoR as well, but I think that’s a bridge too fa. As you probably know, history has shown it’s much harder for an independent to win a lower house seat than a position in the Senate. Knowing that two independent ACT votes could influence the control of the Senate, should be enough incentive to convince ACT electors to break the Liberal/Labor nexus. Alas I think the issue of rusted on supporters is too entrenched

Please vote Zed out at the first opportunity.

Capital Retro8:47 am 14 Jul 21

I knew we had another Senator for the ACT and now I know the name of that person. Thanks for that Dominic.

And she’s very capable with possessing the skills of organising a petition. We are lucky to have her.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.