10 February 2006

Gay Street Parade for Canberra?

| johnboy
Join the conversation
41

I was on the Cube website looking for information to share with you about Gay Speed Dating events held at that club (No, really). Members of the Gay community feel free to let us know if this concept appeals more than hiding in bushes on Black Mountain Peninsula? (Maybe the concept will take off as the nights get colder?)

In any event the last one was on 08-FEB-06, so we’ve just missed it.

However while there I saw they’re looking for feedback on development of a gay and lesbian street parade called Carnivale for Canberra. So get cracking on the form if you’ve got views on the concept.

Join the conversation

41
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

But Johnboy et al on monkeybikes pulling a giant effigy of Pat Carr gagging on a dagwood dog.

Now that would be something to see.

The fact remains, a couple of tractor-driven floats and a Territory Police Band do not a parade make.
Although I like JB’s idea that like-minded creatures could arrive from all around the country. Good for the economy, let’s have it.

Hey, you’re the one who brought sex into this, not me. And I’m happy to agree with the obvious scientific fact that an act of intimacy between two people of opposite genders has a possiblity of creating a child, while an act of intimacy between two people with the same gender has no possibility at all (barring divine intervention, and that hasn’t happened in quite a while).

But we’re not talking about that. We’re talking about how people live there lives once they’ve got kids. And people are remarkably unwilling to remain in the simple boxes you place them in.

Once someone’s had been impreganted, they might change the gender they’re interested in.

A man might lose his wife and then find his next love is a man, and he would like to raise his young children with his new partner.

We’re remarkably good, as a species, at creating wide and varied forms of living our lives, with or without government intervention. And I would say that anybody raising a child should be equal to anybody else raising a child. Anybody in a partnership should be equal to anybody else in a partnership. Anything else just seems wrong to me.

Oh, and I appreciated the Aristophones reference. I don’t get much classical Greek mentions around my daily life…

It’s easy to get stuck on specifics of wills and properties. The greater issue is that discrimination against same sex families flies in the face of so much that has been achieved in recent years. It also runs contrary to principles of humanity and decency and to conflict with the international instruments to which Australia is a party e.g.
(a) guarantees of equality before the law and non discrimination in articles 2.1 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”); and
(b) the right not to be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with a person’s privacy and family in article 17.1 of the ICCPR

…at least according to Alastair Nicholson AO, RFD, QC, (Chief Justice of the Family Court in Australia)(Sep 04).

It’s Friday afternoon, I’m off for a beer.

PS – the Maelinar and Maelinima mentioned in my last post refers to a hypothetical, non-childbearing hetro couple, not you and your spouse. Whoops for the brain-spasm there…

It may be with my wife whom I’ve been married to for 6 years, or it could be to some bird I knocked up over a 1 night stand at the back of Woden Tradies one night 9 months ago. That is a societal issue, but the linkage is via the child.
(Regardless if they have offspring or not).

I think you’ll find those are the comments I have already made in response to your questions, meaning it’s not necessarily the child, but it has also been put into place to protect any future, or possible children from the union.

Now you can argue till you’re blue in the face, but I work in a government program, and I am standing up on my soapbox telling you I deal with the most stupid motherfuckers you could ever imagine, and that’s not including Queenslanders who are in their own category of dumbasses.

I agree with you that these people shouldn’t be allowed to procreate, but we’ve gotta protect their rights now don’t we ?

Eliminate the possibility, you eliminate the reason, which is what the problem is here.

I meant to say this earlier but omitted it, I’m actually in favour of equalising rights amoung any couple, whether they be under the proviso of marriage, de-facto, social arrangement, gayiage or whatever.

Dressing up in frocks and complaining about sex has only worked for one group in history though, although it was probably more about the abscence of sex that got any legislation through.

jamius maximus2:35 pm 10 Feb 06

“…homosexuals are not responsible for their perversions as its a part of their makeup…”

Perversions? HA! What are you, a baptist miniter? Begone foul pillow biting demons.

Good luck to everyone, however I do wonder whether a canberra-based rally/parade will get enough numbers to avoid looking lame.

and that we will JB

I don’t actually have a partner (I can whine about that at great length, but I won’t). But if I did – sure I’d be putting them in my will. I’d be a moron and a whining, whinging twit if I didn’t.

You seem to be suggesting all these benefits only apply, really, because a hetro partnership will create children. But what about those hetro partnerships that don’t create children?

I’d be happy if the laws applied to childless hetro couples in a manner equal to childless gay couples. But they don’t.

And since they don’t, your rationale, while lovely, beautiful and in all other respects perfectly wonderful, doesn’t apply. And there’s a clear and unequivocal unequal treatment going on for no other reason than that Frank and Harry have matching genitals while Maelinar and Maelinima don’t.

I’d imagine for the Carnivale they’d be inviting groups from all over the country to come and participate. In the same way the rev-heads all arrive for summernats.

In my observation these things do tend to mainstream the queer community over time. And once we start thinking of each other as people “like us” then discrimination against them becomes personally offensive.

But hey, they’ve called for comment and people can decide for themselves what they want to do.

thankyou Unbeliever
I may just need said luck 🙂

Ari, you get the gold medallion.

Can you and your hetro love chum share Meciare, PBX and superannuation benefits? Taxation and social security benefits? How’s about benefits from when you were serving in the Defence force – could your hetro slampiece share in Defence force benefits? If you were injured, could she have got veterans’ benefits?

I really don’t know, actually.

But since this is Australia and I can leave my public house to whomsoever I want it to go to once I’m dead, I’m sure my will can accomodate it.

Sure I have to take my wife, whom I got pregnant, to the hospital when we are going to sire a child, and there is a blood relationship via that junction forever. It may be with my wife whom I’ve been married to for 6 years, or it could be to some bird I knocked up over a 1 night stand at the back of Woden Tradies one night 9 months ago. That is a societal issue, but the linkage is via the child.

There are things that need to be set in place for the provision of protection, support etc for that child that do not need to be put in place for people who want to play with their trainsets in beds.

If you stopped thinking about yourselves for a few moments you might recognise that these things haven’t been put in place for the opposing partner, but the result of their partnership. (Regardless if they have offspring or not).

Obviously there are hideous applications of the rules here, such as 2 lesbians having children in order to live together as seperated mothers, licking themselves stupid every chance they get.

Whilst I’m sure they are relishing the good wicket they are on, I’m positive the shoe would be on the other foot when Centrelink asked for one partners PPS for the last 10 years back.

Since you members of gay intent feel so strongly about the issue, answer me this question:

Have you bothered getting your partner into your will, or are you content just whinging and harping about the inequality of it all ?

My guess is, the latter. (although given the generic IQ level of RA readers I’m prepared to be surprised).

Thanks Jey (re. the here here). Good luck with the UC stuff.

I don’t like the idea of a parade as they always poke fun at conservative dorky wowsers. And that’s not fair on Sammy.

and we could all be ‘poo pushing cyclists’ or whatever it was that other charmer called us that time.

I reckon a parade would be good, if only for the chance for a Riot-act float named in honour of Patt Carr.

i think simto sums it up nicely. it is about lingering areas of discrimination to people who break no law.

i dont particularly like the way many homosexuals parade their sexuality, however i have very good friends who are homosexual and you wouldnt know as they dont mince or display any overt gaydar signals.

persecuting someone because of their lifestyle choice is not on. homosexuals are not responsible for their perversions as its a part of their makeup, we may not approve but we dont have to persecute.

im not sure what benefit a mardi gras parade would bring. in my opinion it just reinforces negative stereotypes of homosexuals.

Apologies to Ms. Thumper.

On the other side of the coin, I gotta say I’m not big whoop on the parade stuff either – although that’s probably something to do with me being over thirty, and having seen them as a lot of sound and fury, signifying not particularly much.

Having a chance to gather, scream and shout is fun for the teenagers and twenty-somethings, though, and it does keep them away from the places where the real political pressure is applied until they’ve calmed down a bit. So they do serve SOME kind of purpose.

barking toad and maelinar, while you may not care that ppl are gay, other ppl do and these ppl go out of their way to be homophobic and discriminatory.

Maelinar, I’m assuming for the purpose of the following that you’re straight and married. My apologies if you’re not (you and Thumper do seem VERY friendly, by the by…)

Can you and your hetro love chum share Meciare, PBX and superannuation benefits? Taxation and social security benefits? How’s about benefits from when you were serving in the Defence force – could your hetro slampiece share in Defence force benefits? If you were injured, could she have got veterans’ benefits?

I’m guessing she could. And, if she’d been a man, she couldn’t. Which means there’s a difference. An unfair difference. And all the partnered gays and lesbians (and all the gays and lesbians who want to be partnered someday) are pefectly entitled to scream the place down about how this is deeply discriminatory law, for no other reason than you and your wife happen to have different genitals.

Marches are useful to the extent that it’s a public statement to those who seem to always be talking about ‘the Australian people’ or ‘everyday Australians’ that here’s is a significant group who disagree.

But protests are all too easily dismissed as mobs, as seen of Howard’s reaction to the anti Iraq war rallies.

There are other ways to demand human rights equality from elected representatives. Since the UK govt, the NZ govt, the Canadian govt all care enough to remove this discrimination – I also care enough to do what I can.

To quote the Simpson’s Milhouse : ‘My mum thinks I’m special!’

Can’t your gayness write in your will that you want your estate to go to your gay love chum ?

Or is it the process of it going automatically to the wife if there isn’t a will that you are getting all het up about ?

(when in reality this is open to all kinds of litigation especially in the case of open relationships, lovers, mistresses, ex lovers, unfriendly parents, children etcetera etcetera)

Honestly, nobody fucking cares, and you’re not ‘special’. Go root your boyfriend and cry yourself to sleep in your pillow.

barking toad11:39 am 10 Feb 06

Unbeliever/Jey, I’m not against gay people shouting about what they consider discrimination or rights to things denied them. I may not necessarily agree with all claims but that’s not my point.

What I am tired of is people making an issue of their gayness for the sake of it. I don’t care if you’re gay, I don’t need to be told. I’m just as likely to say “So, I fuck sheep, your point is?” (Warning : sheep fucking is illegal).

Whether you like it or not, any rally or Carnivale will end up being hijacked by those who want to dress up in cowboy chaps and bare their arse to proclaim their gayness rather than rally to protest the issues you raise.

Racial discrimination and sexuality discrimination, from where I’m sitting, has a lot of similarities. While superannuation may be one aspect of inequality in law, it’s symptomatic of the broader discrimination in federal law against the GLBTI community.

It is relative, you’re right JB, but there is a lot of historical and comtemporary similarities between the two struggles. Being marginalised for an innate quality, having laws passed to justify discrimination, having religion used to reason away bigotry – point in place interacial marriages was illegal in some states in the US in the 50s – validated in law.

The hypocrisy of the situation in federal law in Australia is that the Australian Parliament is happy to recognise same-sex couples in anti-terror laws – while refusing to recognise these same couples in relationship laws.

I am mindful, in all this, that there are inequalities abound in many other areas. For examples indigenous rights have all by fallen off the national agenda – and they were here way before I ever was. But I’ve got to start somewhere in speaking up and sometimes ‘f@#$$%# shout’ against discrimination.

oh, my ‘here here’ was to Unbeliever

Sounds like you’ve got a protest issue to parade about UB.

barking toad,

it’s a fact that I’m not discriminated against in federal law in marriage & relationships laws; in parenting & family Law; in Medicare & PBS and superannuation laws; in taxation and social security laws (not to mention the discimination faced by others under veterans’ benefits and Defence Force benefits) because I’m a bloke. Nor am I discriminated against because I’m from a racial minority (thank god). But I am discriminated against, in all the areas above, because I’m gay.

That single reason for these discriminatory laws/policies has by virtue of their existence politicised my sexuality and my relationship!

So despite the fact that this is but only one of the many aspects of who I am, I feel like I have to raise hell about it and not keep ‘f*&^%&* shouting’ about it, because it’s not a choice to accept discrimination.

Like Nina Simone said – ‘you don’t have to live next to me, just give me my equality’ … and that’s all I want (not being able to speak for anyone else here) – equality, no more, no less. Then I’ll shut up!

barking toad10:23 am 10 Feb 06

More’s the pity – nobody told the crackhead “financial consultant” in Sydney last year.

Really, my point is, why the need for the constant parades?

Ubeliever, I did express my views to the organisers, I think I did. I’ve been terribly busy over the last couple of months with my own UC based queer activism.

While not wanting to diminish the importance of allowing same sex couples to access each others super…

Not quite the same thing as the struggle against apartheid is it?

May be that’s the intent of giving your views to the organisers – what the point of a parade would be. Celebration/protest?

There is still a lot of discrimination, significantly though not only, in federal law in Australia. For example, the Australian Parliament insists on denying the fundamental human right of equality in relationship recognition to ALL
citizens, at Howard’s bidding.

Aside from the UK, New Zealand, Canada, Belgium (among many others), South Africa is the latest nation to acknowledge the human rights of equal and formal relationship recognition for ALL of its citizens. And to think Australia once had sanctions against South Africa for its prejudice and narrow-minded policies towards a section of the South African population.

Well bestiality is illegal and homosxuality isn’t.

So that’s a good start no?

barking toad9:54 am 10 Feb 06

If it’s just for gays and lesbians it’s discrimatory. What about those into bestiality? Why exclude those who like to strap on guineau pigs or cuddle up to a nice sheep?

Seriously, I’m so over this gayness. If you’re gay so be it. Do it, don’t be ashamed but ffs, just because you’ve decided to come out, why the need to keep fucking shouting about it in my face!

I wandered past Cube on my way to APK last Friday, and they were advertising Lesbian Speed Dating.

Bearing in mind the old joke “what do lesbians do on a second date – buy a house – what do gay men do on a second date – what second date?”, I’m wondering whether lesbian speed dating means signing a twelve month rental agreeement?

1. I don’t think the Queer Community has too much to celebrate- while things are kinda ok for us in the ACT, around Aus it’s not the case, not to mention around the world.
2. Mardi Gras begin as a protest, not a celebration. If it was organised and set up as a protest that would be awesome, sure they’re may be protest type banners or whatever but to organise and market it as a celebration is bs. I think we have a long, long way to go before we can celebrate for the hell of it and there’s much more important things we could be doing with our time, effort, money and resources.
3. Pink Dollar! The idea of this parade is kinda to funnel ppl into Cube, it ends in the ‘square’ where Cube is located. Cube isn’t preferred by many members of the Canberra Queer Community, it’s targeted at a very specific market.
4. I heard this would be something like the ‘Gay and Lesbian’ parade. Hello! What about the rest of us? I’m a big fan of the inclusivity of ‘queer’.

Oooo what an great idea – slavishly copy what they do in Sydney – lets build a harbour bridge across the lake as well. Terrubo has the right idea.

Come to think of it, two floats and the Territory Police Band would look rather forlorn. Maybe better to have an ACT float as part of Sydney’s Mardi Gras.

See you in the BMP bushes, JB. Don’t run, don’t hide.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.