13 December 2024

Greens to introduce new law to enshrine housing as a human right in the ACT

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
61
Man speaking into microphone

Shane Rattenbury MLA wants to change the way politicians think about housing. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The ACT Greens will introduce new legislation to enshrine housing as a basic human right in the capital.

In Australia, there is no legal right to housing in any state or territory legislation or constitution. If the Greens proposal is successful, the ACT would become the first jurisdiction to do so.

“Like education or healthcare, affordable housing is an essential service and key to living a life with dignity,” ACT Greens leader Shane Rattenbury said.

“This legislation put forward by the Greens reflects a practical way we can focus the priorities of the government, ensuring that the government properly considers housing affordability in decision making.”

READ ALSO Plan for 1000-home gateway greenfield estate in north Canberra unveiled

The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) states that such a law would not compel the government to provide or build a house for every ACT resident. The idea behind the draft bill is to give the issue of affordable housing a greater prominence.

“[Under this proposal], when legislation is introduced in the Assembly, the government will need to consider the human right to housing, which includes the impact on security of tenure for Canberrans, affordability, services like water and electricity, accessibility, location and cultural adequacy,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“It is my hope this legislation will start a conversation both within and outside the government about the level of change that is needed to prioritise building homes for people over the private profit of property investors and companies.”

Joel Dignam, executive director of the advocacy group Better Renting, says he’s interested in seeing what practical difference this law would make for people on the ground.

“I think it will prompt our members of the Assembly in the short-term to think about housing in terms of what they’re doing and not doing in terms of housing,” he said.

“Housing should be sitting alongside sewerage, water systems and schools as something as a government duty to make all people have access to.

“I wouldn’t expect this to turn things around overnight; just putting this in legislation will not solve the problem, and I don’t think it’s intended to … it shows that this is an area that government has a duty and isn’t meeting its standard.

“Setting up these accountability structures puts in place the infrastructure to get the policy change that we ultimately want to see.”

READ ALSO ‘Pathetic’: Jamberoo kicks 150 Telopea Park students out of water park

To pass this bill, the Greens will need the support of Labor, the Liberals and two independents.

Independent MLA Thomas Emerson says his vote for or against this legislation will depend on what it can achieve.

“I’ve focused my negotiations with the government on increasing the proportion of social housing stock in the ACT, which has been going backwards for years. The key question is whether or not this piece of legislation will lead to the construction of more social housing. If it does, I’m all for it,” he said.

Mr Rattenbury says he wants to change the way politicians think about housing.

“For too long, politicians across the nation have treated the government’s role in the housing market as providing for private profit rather than safeguarding our community from the skyrocketing cost of finding and keeping a home,” he said.

“Now more than ever, in the middle of the most urgent housing crisis in living memory, we need to think about housing differently.

“We need to set the groundwork for a complete rethink of the government’s role in the housing market, providing a starting point for deeper, more ambitious discussions about how the government can provide truly affordable homes.”

A copy of the draft legislation and an associated discussion paper can be found on the ACT Greens website.

Join the conversation

61
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Maybe the Greens MLAs should open their houses to the homeless.
Just have a look at the GEOCON twin towers in Gungahlin, social housing mixed in with investors and owners… a total debacle.

Incidental Tourist3:52 pm 16 Dec 24

The human right for home means free home. The problem with it is very large cost. It is way larger than education, medical and food. It will ultimately place undue tax burden to the rest of taxpayers. This will also change people behaviour. It will encourage people “claim” free home by manufacturing eligibility conditions, rather than attempt to study and work to buy a house. A better way is to provide clear pathway to earn and buy home. For example this may include selling land at a capped price limited to 1-2 annual salary and relaxing regulation to allow building cheaper pre-fabricated dwellings.

The reality is for a person to have a home to live in, someone has to work to make that happen. The more we talk about rights without talking about responsibilities, the weaker we’re making our society. There are those who are unable to work to one degree or another and we need to ensure they are adequately supported, but there are also people out there who choose not to work but rather be a burden on everyone else.

Another slippery slope that landlords will have to deal with. I’m so glad i sold my IP and out of the Canberra market.

In the Bill
(b) no-one may be unlawfully or arbitrarily evicted from their
home

Then in the discussion paper on page 6, you get this…

The right to adequate housing
requires public authorities to
refrain from forced evictions.
The government must also
take reasonable measures to
ensure that third parties, such
as private landlords, do not
carry out forced evictions.

Will this ‘basic right’ also include air conditioning, solar panels, backup batteries for power, insulation, 70inch TV screens..etc for all public housing and rental properties…at the cost to the public purse and landlords!!!!!!!!!!! Just get rid of these ‘watermelons’ (ie. green skin on the outside and pure red on the inside)

Harley Quinn3:31 pm 16 Dec 24

Talk about a radical interpretation of the text. Where did you even come up with that nonsense?

Trust there are enough sensible people in the Assembly to vote down and out this Ideological bubble..

ChrisinTurner1:14 pm 14 Dec 24

It may not be their policy but the government’s practice is to reduce public housing. The percentage of social housing keeps dropping.

Any idea that comes from the Communist Greens is a bad idea. Want proof? Look at their history.

GrumpyGrandpa12:18 pm 14 Dec 24

Good old Maslow would probably agree with Mr Rattenbury. Shelter and food are basic level needs.
It’s just kind of awkward making them a “right” that someone else has to pay for.

The Greens love mandating entitlements but I’ve never heard them talk about what responsibilities citizens have

Another Ideological bubble moment.

How about Draft Legislation revolving around Self Sufficiency..?

More la la land , paid for by who again

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.