23 March 2025

It's hard Labor as crossbench and Liberals play numbers game in Assembly

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
17
Legislative Assembly building

Minority government means the Legislative Assembly is less of a rubber stamp. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

How far will the crossbench in the Legislative Assembly go?

The shift to minority government has certainly changed the dynamics in the Assembly, with Labor actually having to deal with private business motions and legislation rather than just using their numbers, with Greens support, to sideline the Liberals.

So far this year, the independents, the Greens and the Liberals have managed to gang up on Labor over a number of issues, such as the closure of the Burrangiri respite aged care in Rivett and light rail stage 2B costings.

It’s an effort to ventilate these issues in the Assembly and hold the government accountable, but it also aims to bend the government to the Assembly’s will.

The strategy may put more pressure on Labor but a resolution in the Assembly does not mean the government will obey.

READ ALSO Government commits to coercive control Bill, but evidence must support making it a crime

Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith has ignored the Assembly’s calls for Burrangiri to stay open until alternative services are located and remains committed to closing the service at the end of the financial year.

Transport Minister Chris Steel will still only provide publicly available information on light rail, and anything deemed commercially sensitive will stay secret.

Chief Minister Barr noted in the Assembly debate on the light rail costings motion from the Opposition that this year, the use of standing order 213A to obtain documents has surged.

He said that while this is a vehicle open to the Opposition, executive privilege can still be claimed to withhold documents.

Mr Barr warned that the ACT did not have an army of public servants available to meet Assembly orders for information and that overuse of S213A will only tie up the public service and become costly if a judge has to adjudicate executive privilege.

Mr Barr said freedom of information avenues and question time were more cost-effective ways for the Opposition to seek information to hold the government to account.

“This does seem to be making a political point for the sake of it,” he said.

Of course, Mr Barr himself, perhaps irritated by the extra scrutiny that the changed numbers in the Assembly have brought, is making a political point.

He can’t blame the crossbench and the Opposition for working together to put the government on the spot.

However, an Assembly vote on a motion is not a ‘plebiscite’ on government policy or decisions of the executive. The wheels of government cannot grind to a halt unless, of course, the Greens and independent Thomas Emerson withdraw their support on supply.

But the new dynamic doesn’t stop there.

Last week, Greens Leader Shane Rattenbury introduced a Bill to overturn a decision of the Territory Planning Authority for the approval of a phone tower in Ainslie in support of the Friends of Ainslie Volcanic Grassland, who have been restoring the land.

Whatever the merits of conserving this patch of land and the work that has been done, Mr Steel, as Planning Minister, is right to say that if passed, the Bill would undermine the planning system and create unacceptable uncertainty for proponents.

The Liberals have not revealed their hand, but one would hope that they would agree on maintaining the integrity of the planning system rather than play politics with such an important principle.

It could open the floodgates to attempts to resolve all kinds of sectional issues by individual legislation.

READ ALSO New government levy on Airbnb owners won’t make any difference, tourism industry says

With a minority government it is perfectly legitimate to leverage the numbers and make Labor work harder and get the best outcomes for the community.

The Assembly should be able to ensure that legislation is the best it can be. Even combining to make a political point is fair game.

But just because you can doesn’t mean you should. It might be better for the crossbench and Liberals to pick their battles.

Don’t expect Labor to kowtow. It remains in government, has a guarantee of confidence and supply, and hopes to implement its agenda.

Just how long the Greens and Mr Emerson will tolerate Labor ignoring them or, for that matter, Labor putting up with constant demands in the Assembly because they are outnumbered is an open question.

Could there be a deal breaker that brings this minority government to an end?

It’s a long way until 2028.

Join the conversation

17
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon9:27 pm 24 Mar 25

“The Liberals have not revealed their hand, but one would hope that they would agree on maintaining the integrity of the planning system rather than play politics with such an important principle.”

The suggestion that there is inherently, or by custom and practice, integrity in the ACT planning system is almost Putinesque in its audacity and representation of reality.

Assembly involvement in individual planning decisions to the level of detail seen in some local councils would clearly not be feasible, but that is no reason at all why a monumentally arrogant executive and its hand picked senior bureaucracy should be allowed to continue running this town by what has amounted to a series of fixed term dictatorships when the majority of ACT voters have clearly decided otherwise.

Zaphod Beetlebrox12:30 pm 24 Mar 25

Should the elected ACT Legislative Assembly have the right to veto a Planning Authority decision? The Planning Minister has lost this power under the new Planning Act and the Liberals questioned the wisdom of this (Cain). In a representative democracy, MLAs have a mandate and it would seem that that mandate would include blocking a development that otherwise has approval.

Democracy is a messy business. Federal Parliment has recently demonstrated that votes for one legislation can be traded for support on another. There is nothing new about this. If the Legisative Assembly can change the ACT Planning Act and Territory Plan, why should it not be able to veto an approval of the Planning Authority? It is yet another check and balance provided by the Legislative Assembly.

Far more significant is the dynamics of the Legislative Assembly, which is providing most interesting after the pantomine of the tenth Assembly (2020-2024). An interesting dynamic is developing between the Greens and Liberals. Labour feels less safe. Transparency is now demanded. After years of Labour political stagnation, the “minor” parties have found a voice. The indepents are wildcards. The Legislative Assembly newsworthy gain. A welcome change.

So why was it not a problem in the last term when the government used their numbers to evade making costs public, and run what amounted yo a pseudo dictatorship, but now that the shoe is on the other foot it’s “playing the numbers game”?

If it wasn’t for double standards, Ian, you’d have no standards at all.

Politicians are right, when you look at the current dilemma it is the voters fault. We brought this on ourselves. Have been a Canberra resident since 1963 (brought here as a small boy) and have lived here off and on (Adelaide, Brisbane, Alice Springs etc) since then. Canberra had great roads, parks and gardens, hospital and bus services that could cater for the smaller population, and urban footprint, free parking, decent planning etc Critics will crawl out of the woodwork and revile my memories of those days. Some aspects of Canberra have improved but generally have gone backward as the city grew. The Local Council is to blame (both sides) and could fix these issues with a bit of honesty and good governance however the lack of accountability is reinforced after every election. This sits with us.

“a resolution in the Assembly does not mean the government will obey.”

Really shows the disdain ACT Labor have for accountability, and for the people of Canberra.

Surely guarantees of supply only hold to a certain point, and the smell around last year’s massive budget shortfall and keeping it quiet in an election year is quite strong.

“Whatever the merits of conserving this patch of land and the work that has been done, Mr Steel, as Planning Minister, is right to say that if passed, the Bill would undermine the planning system and create unacceptable uncertainty for proponents.”

“https://the-riotact.com/fyshwick-recycling-future-clouded-as-proposal-site-goes-on-market/460338”

Ah yes, using legislative powers to undermine the planning system is a bad thing…..

Short memories and all that.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.