19 September 2024

Kowen Forest to make way for Canberra's newest town centre under Liberals

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
81
Peter Cain and Elizabeth Lee

Liberal planning spokesperson Peter Cain and Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee announce the housing strategy at the Nue construction site in Gungahlin. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

The Canberra Liberals will clear Kowen Forest to establish a new town centre with 100,000 dwellings, setting up a clear choice on 19 October between their bigger Canberra and the compact city favoured by Labor and the Greens.

The Kowen Forest plan is part of a housing strategy that aims to deliver 125,000 new dwellings in the capital by 2050, when the ACT’s population is expected to hit 700,000.

The strategy was immediately welcomed by the Housing Industry Association but slammed by Labor and the Greens.

The strategy announced by Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee at a Gungahlin construction site is a combination of the long-term town centre plan and, in the short term, accelerated land releases in suburbs such as Macnamara, Whitlam and Kenny, including more single blocks and sensible infill.

Ms Lee said this “bold and ambitious” strategy struck the right balance and offered real choice to Canberrans.

It also offers help to first-home buyers wanting house and land packages. All single residential blocks of land owned by the Suburban Land Agency in Jacka and Whitlam will be available ‘over the counter’, with 10 per cent reserved for first home buyers offered at 75 per cent of market value, subject to the standard eligibility requirements.

Ten per cent of all development will also be reserved for affordable housing.

Ms Lee said a Liberal Government would also move to develop land at Symonston, calling it a lost opportunity, and continue to negotiate with the Federal Government to unlock the former CSIRO Ginninderra land for housing.

However, the proposed cross-border Parkwood development in the northwest looks unlikely under a Liberal Government, with Ms Lee refusing to say if she supported it.

READ ALSO Taylor local centre proposal includes 38 townhouses above shops

While the Liberals are looking east to provide a long-term housing pipeline for the ACT, they will abandon investigations on the western edge due to its ecological sensitivity and farmland.

But they will proceed with a feasibility study of land west of the Murrumbidgee in Tuggeranong, which the government deems too sensitive to develop.

Ms Lee said the Liberals would also fast-track the Canberra Racing Club’s proposed housing development at Thoroughbred Park.

She has also listened to the property industry on the government’s dual occupancy policy limiting a second home to 120 square metres, promising to scrap the “arbitrary” limit and allow separately titled dual occupancies on eligible RZ1 blocks larger than 800sqm to maximise land use in suburban zones.

This has had a poor take-up, with the industry saying 120 sqm is too small for new projects to be viable.

Ms Lee has also committed to reviewing the lease variation charge.

The Liberals will also promote mixed-use residential development in CZ2 and CZ3 retail precincts and trades areas such as Phillip to encourage residential development in established commercial centres.

“This is a good combination, a good balance in making sure we’re delivering to the Canberra market what they need and what they want,” Ms Lee said.

“And that is a combination of high-rise apartments like the ones we see here [in Gungahlin], as well as townhouses and, of course, the single dwellings that we know Canberrans want.”

Kowen Forest will be bulldozed for housing under the Liberals. It is about 30 km from the city centre. Photo: ACT Government

Ms Lee said the strategy would also be a boon for the ACT’s bottom line with land sales expected to bring in about $900 million in the first term of a Liberal government.

Ms Lee would not say when Kowen Forest would be developed and brushed off questions about urban sprawl and the cost of developing a new town centre some 30 km from the city centre.

She said the site was about the same distance as many of the suburbs in Tuggeranong from the city centre, and the development cost would be offset through a combination of land sales and revenue from rates, levies and land tax.

“The best thing about starting a district centre or a town centre from scratch is that we do have at our disposal the time to plan out what is going to work best for the community,” she said.

“That is going to take into consideration public transport access, that is going to take into consideration sewage, electricity, community services including health, education and recreation as well as, of course, a mixture of housing options to deliver that genuine choice that Canberrans need.”

Ms Lee said Kowen Forest was not ecologically sensitive but two nearby nature parks would be preserved.

She was confident that the engineering challenges to do with access to the area could be overcome.

Planning Minister Chris Steel said Labor already had a plan to deliver 30,000 new homes by 2030 in areas such as Molonglo Valley and within the existing urban footprint, including missing middle housing to be through planning changes in the next term.

“The Canberra Liberals have announced a plan for 25 years’ time that won’t deliver any new housing that we need right now and would develop a disconnected suburb that really requires quite significant work on utilities, a massive investment in new transport infrastructure, and that is completely reliant on New South Wales,” he said.

Mr Steel said the Canberra Liberals could not explain how they would bring those land releases in new suburbs forward.

“They’re already in the program, which sets out over 21,000 new dwellings that would be supported in the next five years,” Mr Steel said.

“We need to undertake more housing development within the existing urban footprint. Canberra is a very spread out place, and we can’t continue to sprawl out into the nature reserves or into areas like Kowen that are used by the community for recreation and have quite significant environmental significance.”

However, Labor would continue investigations on the western edge.

READ ALSO ACT Greens pledge to set compulsory minimum standards for all rental properties, including fixed heating

ACT Greens candidate for Ginninderra Jo Clay said developing a new town centre there and providing services and transport connections would be costly.

“Building on the outskirts of the city is expensive and it isolates people, making it difficult for them to access work, health, education and community services,” she said.

“It’s also really expensive to build new greenfields suburbs – it costs up to $60,000 more per dwelling because the government has to build new roads, sewerage and services for the new suburbs.

“How do they expect people to get to this new suburb? And at what cost? How are all these people going to get to work or to essential services like healthcare?”

ACT Greens Deputy Leader Rebecca Vassarotti also attacked the Liberals for leaving open the possibility of developing West Tuggeranong.

HIA Greg Wellers said Kowen Forest was a good solution and welcomed a long-term pipeline of land that would take the pressure off Canberrans who feel like every land sale will be the last.

“The ACT has to accept that the current approach to planning is pushing families into surrounding developments in NSW,” he said.

“We continue to support increasing density within the city’s existing footprint and have long said that the discussion shouldn’t be one or the other regarding infill or greenfield.”

Join the conversation

81
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
sportz fotos3:56 pm 23 Sep 24

Looks like a good plan to transition the Kowen Forest part of the Rally of Canberra into an urban tarmac rally, not to mention removing the good work that the Light Car Club of Canberra have done over the past years in Symonston with their Khanacross events.

Oh.. so… It is a choice between innovation and infrastructure with the Liberal visionary party for WE THE PEOPLE… or shoe box, infill and tiny homes from Labor/Greens as you squish in a wonky design around the forbidden to cut down (or $80,000 fine) protected trees on your own private property? Gee.. I dunno? Do I pick the brainer option? Liberal? Or the non brainer option at the ballot box? Oh der people. Vote Liberal… it’s a no brainer. Seriously. Labor/Greens priority is dead trees for possums to multiply and then run out on the road and die… road kill. So I equate this level of thinking to skid marks… a stain on the reputation of Canberra. A smear on my fair city. People not dead possums!!

Fair enough – Labor has Jack D. and the Libs have you.

Although Jack D.’s offerings are more coherent and readable, even if they do have more bias than a truck load of lawn bowls balls. I find Bindi’s posts difficult to read and understand – more of a rant than a post.

@DJA
Fair comment.

I guess Jack D. has a far greater investment in the promotion of his party.

Indeed, my “rants” are difficult for sensory types to understand. They require a high level of conceptual framework, visualization and intuitive thinking of the reader before the concept can be understood. It is because I am an INFJ personality type, an artist, social worker and teacher, with multiple degrees … So probably quite rare for the other 70% of extrovert and sensory types. Think about my comments as a rare gift of insight into the internal workings of the rarest personality type on the planet combined with a touch of art. I am sure you would also struggle in a gallery without everything explained for you in concrete lists, facts and procedures… so broaden your lense to a new reality, a vastly different paradigm, and the exquisite concepts my extraordinary brain can synthesize…. otherwise, look at it, learn it, move on…

I know, I will spell it out for you. The first part refers to the Liberal policy of removing the fire hazard of the pine trees and doing something different like building infrastructure. The second part refers to the current Labor/Greens multiple policies of urban infill, limiting secondary houses to shoe box sized 120 square tiny homes, and the Urban Forestry Act preventing the cutting down of 8 metre and above protected trees, even if they are on your private property, even if they are dead, widow maker trees to house possums etc whilst acquiring the 2 square metres under that tree in your own backyard as protected, so no parking cars under the tree. If you cut them down it is $80,000 in fines or ask permission $600… is that description/analysis enough? Now can I please be “permitted” to go back to synthesis which is the natural way of expression for highly conceptual artistic infj personality types?

Yes DJA, to understand me, you have to be across policies, do your research, lift your game, there’s a good sport. Lol.

People who wear their Meyers-Brigg personality assessment like a badge of honour don’t understand the Meyers-Brigg personality assessments.

Hmm, INFJ eh Bindi? So, you don’t think and you rush to judgement, right?

Worse, you think it makes sense.

Nothing there does.

The purpose of “Personality types” is not to define people or badge them, it is a communication tool. It was you seeking to understand me, so I kindly assisted you by referring to my perspective on reality as communicated by I.N.F.J. You seem to be stuck in needing to “define” people, which is concrete thinking. It is also “control”. So I take time to help you, and you still whinge. I don’t RANT. I am communicating MY OUTRAGE… politely. I am sorry if it makes you feel bad, but why do I have to pretend to be stupid to prevent stupid from feeling bad? Seriously. Do your research on policy, get across it, then get back to posting your own original ideas instead of criticism of mine.

Absolutely. Thanks so much for the compliment. Xx

Indeed, the whole concept of this post was to communicate the “nonsense” of the Labor/Greens multiple policies politely and artistically. Although you are all confused with this new type of commenting…. you are all talking about it.

Chris Steel might want to reflect on Labor and the Greens failure to release land in Kenny, inside the city footprint after 14 years before putting his foot in his mouth. Jo Clay should reflect on why it is that some 10,000 people call Googong home and ACT government responsibility for the lack of better options.

A bad idea on several levels but if it goes ahead lets hope two things happen.

Firstly lets not repeat the mistakes made in Molonglo and build the necessary infrastructure before the first dwelling has been completed.

Part of that would mean the already overdue duplication of Pialligo Avenue and replacement of every set of traffic lights and every roundabout between Sutton road and Parkes Way tunnel with overpass intersections. It would also mean talking to counterparts in NSW to have the same done to Sutton Road and improvements in traffic flow around Queanbeyan because that will be the main route between Kowen and Tuggeranong.

The second thing would be a significant proportion of residential land area be used for government housing.

Gregg Heldon10:14 pm 19 Sep 24

I drive past Kowen Forest on Kings Highway a few times every couple of months, and I always think to myself what a new Valley and town centre would look like there. And how many suburbs.
People will buy there. Close to HQJOC, Queanbeyan, the airport precinct and quick access to the coast, Goulburn and towns beyond.
I also like the part in the policy for quots for affordable and social housing. And over the counter land sales for the developing suburbs.
And anyone who works in Fyshwick or the Parliamentary Triangle would be interested in real estate in Symonston.

Surprising there is no comment on the impact on the commercial economy of Queanbeyan compared with Canberra. Queanbeyan looks to me as likely being the dominant beneficiary of a Kowen development.

Laurence De B. Anderson4:21 pm 19 Sep 24

And are they going to plant trees elsewhere to offset the massive carbon gain this will incur?

NSW has created Googong and South Jerra whose residents use ACT services but don’t pay ACT rates. There is no sign these developments will cease, so the ACT may as well get in on the act

All swings and roundabouts.

Every time an ACT resident drives out of the ACT it’s on NSW roads and using NSW services. Everything an ACT resident buys in a supermarket comes in via NSW roads on road damaging heavy vehicles but ACT residents aren’t paying for those roads.

Kowen has always been the forgotten district of the ACT and it’s great to see the Libs have the vision to finally open it up for development! 100,000 dwellings = 250,000 people according to latest average household size data! Very exciting proposition which will secure the future of Canberra’s housing supply for decades!

Do you have any ideas on how the Libs are going to pay for such a significant proposal and build the infrastructure needed to support such a large and disconnected suburb housing over 125,000 people? 30 kilometres from the city centre, this proposed new suburb currently has no facilities to support such a significant and unaffordable proposal. Infrastructure and environmental costs to get started would be astronomical including new roads, safety and fire reduction planning, water and sewage, electricity, schools, shops etc. etc.

Jack D,
What does the upfront cost matter? The economic benefits and growth will clearly be enormous.

Why are you always so rabidly negative to any forward thinking progressive proposal?

This development is clearly visionary, opening up new housing fronts to shape our city, providing essential housing for our growing population. Everyone will benefit.

Of course I don’t have to produce any evidence to support these assertions because anyone who disagrees is just a backwards thinking troglodyte, who doesn’t understand how “visionary” thinking has shaped our country into what it is today.

Amanda Kiley7:29 am 20 Sep 24

How does Labor pay for everything? Increased rates and taxes. If you read the article “land sales expected to bring in about $900 million in the first term of a Liberal government”. Then ongoing rates from the area.

Incidental Tourist3:36 pm 19 Sep 24

Kowen is the only remaining district-scale pocket of land in ACT with good proximity to Brindabella business park, Airport, Fyshwick, and Civic. As Canberra keeps growing new Kowen district is a question of “when” not “if”.

Housing is a critical issue throughout Australia and should be above political point scoring. If the Liberals had their say, they would be bulldozing and ripping into every vacant parcel of land in and around the Territory.

I remember well this proposal being floated by the Liberals at the last election with Alistair Coe in the media talking up development on vacant land in nature reserves from Weston Creek to the border, including Murrumbidgee, Namadgi National Park and Kowen Forest. He promised that a government led by him would cut through any red and green tape to ensure this happened. It appears this is another thought bubble from the Liberals with Elizabeth Lee now resurrecting the party’s policies from previous elections.

The costs of building infrastructure to support such a large and disconnected suburb at Kowen with no current facilities, 30 kilometres from our city centre and housing over 125,000 new residents would be astronomical and unaffordable. New roads, safety and fire reduction planning, public transport, water and sewage, electricity, schools, shops and sporting facilities are just a few that come to mind.

This new policy announcement from the Liberals stops people focusing on the party’s lack of policy substance. The party’s election commitments including this proposal now exceeds over $2b including a new stadium and convention centre. They have promised to reduce rates and taxes but silent on what services and public service jobs they will slash to fund these promises. The party has made no commitments to health or many other policy areas including support for the building of a new North side hospital planned for the next term of government.

How much exactly will the infrastructure cost Jack?

You must have some studies on the area that you’ve read?

Strange though that you mention the $2 billion dollars of Liberal election promises without mentioning the ALPs promises are significantly larger.

I agree that is a bad idea to add to Canberra’s sprawl. While Kowen Forest is not as bad as West Tuggeranong, it’s still pretty bad. What no one has mentioned, is that apart from the initial costs in creating the infrastructure for 100,000 residents, spread out in single family plots (think roads, pipes, electric wires, etc), you have the ongoing costs of maintaining it all. The cheaper rates in a location like Kowen would not cover it. It would be a big money loser for the territory in the long run.

wildturkeycanoe2:28 pm 19 Sep 24

Unless they have a plan to make Pialligo Avenue three lanes in each direction, Kowen is not the place for new housing.

Why do politicians of all parties keep on wanting to grow the population of the ACT, apart from the obvious that more rate payers give them more power (rate payers’ money to spend).

Maybe it’s time to draw a line and say no new housing areas will be developed in the ACT, and work with adjoining areas to develop housing etc there?

Thanks! The most intelligent comment so far. We have to discourage, not encourage, over-population in general, and in beautiful Canberra’s case we have to discourage anyone trying to turn it into another Sydney or Melbourne sprawl at the expense of the natural environment.

Call me dumb but building east of the airport seems like good use of ACT land. It’s definitely better than leaving the greenfield suburbs across the border which means our hospitals etc are used without collecting the rates, GST receipts etc because of the border. And yes there’s nothing there at the moment but it’s not that far away. By my calculation (using google maps) it’s 17km from civic to the other side of the nature escarpment using existing roads. 22 minute drive currently without the infrastructure upgrades that would obviously go into supporting that. You’ve also already got the existing infrastructure of Queanbeyan directly south.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.