Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Fly direct from
Canberra to New Zealand

Making life harder for paedos

By johnboy - 16 February 2012 34

Simon Corbell has announced he’s legislating today for more court powers when dealing with child sex offenders:

“Under these tough new measures, the bill proposes to increase maximum penalties, tighten reporting requirements and introduce new prohibition orders that will limit circumstances in which registered child sex offenders can be near children,” Mr Corbell said.

“Courts will have the power to ban offenders from being within a certain distance of a school or child care centre, engaging in some types of employment, or taking photographs of children.

“ACT Policing will be able to intervene in circumstances where there is evidence that the registered offender poses a risk to a child or children through breaching of this order without a reasonable excuse.”

The Magistrates Court will decide what behaviour will be prohibited after considering the behaviour and circumstances of the registered offender’s conduct.

“This intervention is aimed at protecting those children identified as at risk, and at addressing the rates of reoffending child sex offenders,” he said.

Mr Corbell announced that these amendments will also require registered offenders to report electronic communication identifiers not previously required, including email addresses and chat room usernames.

Penalties for offences are also being increased.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
34 Responses to
Making life harder for paedos
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Lookout Smithers 6:27 pm 17 Feb 12

colourful sydney racing identity said :

Lookout Smithers said :

The_TaxMan said :

Lookout Smithers said :

I would be willing to assume life might be already hard for perpetrators and victims. One versus the other in observation is not helpful for anyone.

Sorry but the fact that perpetrators are allowed to keep breathing is enough to make me ill. So ‘hard for perpetrators” who gives a rats arse about the perpetrators 🙁

Well if it matters that much to you then we will assume that you are hard at work looking for better ways to deal with this very confronting issue. I could not care less about perpetrators or victims myself. But I have no bright ideas on how to best tackle the issue. So I will just comment on the article the way it is written, rather than shout out on how much I pretend to give a shit.

You ‘could not care less’ about children who are victims of sexual abuse? You are not fit to be a member of our society.

Well I am glad that you don’t have a say in who is fit and who isn’t. I spent 5 years in court as a witness against a known repeat offender. I gave evidence for 7 others being the only one with evidence. I learnt about how courts render themselves largely inaffective regarding this issue. Im not going to go out and preach what is the way forward. I let the learned chaps like you stand around with moral tears for all the victims. You don’t have to cry if you don’t feel like it mate. Pfft. Expert.

I-filed 10:03 pm 16 Feb 12

JB – hmmm, law enforcement AND paedos. Did you think to check what matter might be slipping under the radar while this is being put out by the government?

Deref 8:56 pm 16 Feb 12

HenryBG said :

Proboscus said :

Deref said :

Roadrage77 said :

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

It’s interesting coming from a gubmint that believes that gaol is a last resort, reserved only for people who kill politicians – everyone else gets a finger-wagging.

But paedophilia has been so demonised that it, like “terrism”, is the perfect soft target for any pollie who wants an instant headline and easy votes.

I eagerly await the “won’t somebody think of the children” responses.

Paedophilia has been “demonised” because it is an atrocious act upon our most vulnerable.

But if you want to defend the scum who choose to conduct themselves in this way instead of applauding any legislation that protects kids – you’re a bigger tool than I gave you credit for.

Thank you. Saved me the trouble.

You’ll find there is a certain section of the community which is (at best) ambivalent about protecting children from sexual predators, and Deref’s contribution contained more than just an echo of that attitude.

That’s two. Thanks for proving my point so well.

I wonder who’s going to be first to charge me with actually being a paedophile.

Tooks 8:52 pm 16 Feb 12

Deref said :

Roadrage77 said :

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

It’s interesting coming from a gubmint that believes that gaol is a last resort, reserved only for people who kill politicians – everyone else gets a finger-wagging.

But paedophilia has been so demonised that it, like “terrism”, is the perfect soft target for any pollie who wants an instant headline and easy votes.

I eagerly await the “won’t somebody think of the children” responses.

Three paragraphs of rampant stupidity. Thanks for that.

HenryBG 7:51 pm 16 Feb 12

Proboscus said :

Deref said :

Roadrage77 said :

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

It’s interesting coming from a gubmint that believes that gaol is a last resort, reserved only for people who kill politicians – everyone else gets a finger-wagging.

But paedophilia has been so demonised that it, like “terrism”, is the perfect soft target for any pollie who wants an instant headline and easy votes.

I eagerly await the “won’t somebody think of the children” responses.

Paedophilia has been “demonised” because it is an atrocious act upon our most vulnerable.

But if you want to defend the scum who choose to conduct themselves in this way instead of applauding any legislation that protects kids – you’re a bigger tool than I gave you credit for.

Thank you. Saved me the trouble.

You’ll find there is a certain section of the community which is (at best) ambivalent about protecting children from sexual predators, and Deref’s contribution contained more than just an echo of that attitude.

Merle 7:25 pm 16 Feb 12

Proboscus said :

Alderney said :

Last Saturday, as I accompanied my 3 year old boy to gymnastics, it did cross my mind that if I took out the iphone to take a pics that I might be viewed with suspicion by the many other parents.

I therefore have no pics of my boy doing his first gym.

Not saying I don’t agree that our children deserve the best protection the State can offer from rock spiders, but in my situation is this what the world has come to?

As a parent I would have issues if you took photos of my children without my permission. I can’t understand why you wouldn’t take photos of your own child?

Seriously? You would have a problem with another parent taking pictures of their kid if yours just happened to also be in the shot? That’s nuts.

Deref 6:46 pm 16 Feb 12

Proboscus said :

Deref said :

Roadrage77 said :

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

It’s interesting coming from a gubmint that believes that gaol is a last resort, reserved only for people who kill politicians – everyone else gets a finger-wagging.

But paedophilia has been so demonised that it, like “terrism”, is the perfect soft target for any pollie who wants an instant headline and easy votes.

I eagerly await the “won’t somebody think of the children” responses.

Paedophilia has been “demonised” because it is an atrocious act upon our most vulnerable.

But if you want to defend the scum who choose to conduct themselves in this way instead of applauding any legislation that protects kids – you’re a bigger tool than I gave you credit for.

Wow – that was faster than I expected.

Perhaps you’d be kind enough to indicate that part where I defended paedophilia and/or paedophiles.

Proboscus 5:52 pm 16 Feb 12

Deref said :

Roadrage77 said :

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

It’s interesting coming from a gubmint that believes that gaol is a last resort, reserved only for people who kill politicians – everyone else gets a finger-wagging.

But paedophilia has been so demonised that it, like “terrism”, is the perfect soft target for any pollie who wants an instant headline and easy votes.

I eagerly await the “won’t somebody think of the children” responses.

Paedophilia has been “demonised” because it is an atrocious act upon our most vulnerable.

But if you want to defend the scum who choose to conduct themselves in this way instead of applauding any legislation that protects kids – you’re a bigger tool than I gave you credit for.

Deref 5:23 pm 16 Feb 12

Roadrage77 said :

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

It’s interesting coming from a gubmint that believes that gaol is a last resort, reserved only for people who kill politicians – everyone else gets a finger-wagging.

But paedophilia has been so demonised that it, like “terrism”, is the perfect soft target for any pollie who wants an instant headline and easy votes.

I eagerly await the “won’t somebody think of the children” responses.

Proboscus 5:17 pm 16 Feb 12

Pandamony said :

The sentencing model doesn’t offer a lot of protection for the community when the offender is eventually released. How about a model where if someone is assessed that they are likely to re-offend then they are not released, with an ongoing periodic reassessment process? That way the community will be protected until they are truly reformed.

You’re model has some merit for your normal, everyday, run of the mill criminal – unfortunately paedophiles cannot be reformed.

And because we’re in the ACT, the un-silent minority would predictably bang on about the lack of Human Rights, Privacy, etc, that they believe these scum bags deserve.

RaTTyRaTT 5:16 pm 16 Feb 12

Ironically the issue always that is skirted around in this is “why does the incidence of this continue” along with “what happens behind closed doors across canberra” is more worrying.
The simple and sad fact is that this kind of thing is usually a symptom of the family life at home disintegrating, from either internal or external issues, such as money problems, marital issues, external influence (supposed friends, etc!)
Because of that, to be blunt, we’re always going to have this group of criminals in society. The worst thing is that the amount of unreported abuse that goes on is (personal figure) roughly between 2 to 6 times as high.

I think while the abuse is wrong, other ways of approaching this need to be considered. Just labelling and discarding people, combined with making their lives miserable will further drive them down the path that they may have (in some cases) inadvertently stepped on. Especially as more and more the feeling of disempowerment by people (parents, fathers, grandparents, etc) is being felt through ‘benelovent legislation!’ Never mind fiscal pressures.

Note also, there are many ‘forms’ of child abuse, and in some cases (well publicised) children can be ‘accused’ of child abuse, and put on a sex offenders list for life. Explain how that will ‘help’ them to be ‘cured’ or protect the community from them? This issue is contentious, yet I agree with JonahBologna – we can’t just create an underclass of citizens.

I’m not a bleeding heart about this, seen too much myself to not get angry, but if we can’t approach this rationally – we’re not going to make a dent in it. Emotional response (egged on by media) will create a worse world for us all. I know the feeling where I can’t take pictures of my kids in public, because I had someone yell at me once – ‘he’ was standing off to one side, and thought I was taking pictures of ‘him’ – go figure. Had others say the same, so my amateur photography sticks to scenery from now on – people are too stupid to deal with.

Roadrage77 5:06 pm 16 Feb 12

Yet another attention-grabbing stunt from Corbell who’s determined to leave his initials in the pavement or die trying.

Political stunts like this merely foster moral panic amongst paranoid parents.

Pandamony 4:12 pm 16 Feb 12

The sentencing model doesn’t offer a lot of protection for the community when the offender is eventually released. How about a model where if someone is assessed that they are likely to re-offend then they are not released, with an ongoing periodic reassessment process? That way the community will be protected until they are truly reformed.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site