Mitchell to the City on ACTION

Sgt.Bungers 23 May 2009 22

This morning I had to drop my car in for a service in Mitchell. I then chose to take an ACTION bus to City Interchange to go to work. I caught the 56 bus at 8:46am from the North Western end of Mitchell. I got off the bus in the City Interchange at 9:18am. 32 minutes to travel 8.7km. An average of 16.3km/h. I then had to walk to my office closer to ANU, another 12 minutes thanks to the fun that is crossing Northbourne Avenue on foot, with signals timed for a 5-6 minute waiting time for pedestrians. All up, 9.3km took me 44 minutes using the fasted available means of public transport in peak hour, or 12.7km/h average.

My point, mainly that someone with average fitness could have jogged to the City from Mitchell in less time than it took me to utilise ACT public transport this morning. Someone with good fitness could have done it in 30% less time.

Should travel times like this be considered an acceptable caveat when utilising a cheap form of “environmentally friendly” transport? Is this really an attractive, acceptable, viable solution to getting us out of our less viable (long term) private means of transport?

If not, what can we do to improve environmentally friendly transport to and from the city from the North in peak hour? AM/PM bus lanes on Northbourne? 24h bus lanes on the median of Northbourne? Light Rail? A massive, free car park at EPIC, with express busses running every 2-3 minutes from it, into the City in peak hour? Completely flatten Canberra and rebuild it with the aim of fitting all residents into an 80% smaller footprint?

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
22 Responses to Mitchell to the City on ACTION
richardh9935 richardh9935 8:02 pm 06 Jul 09

High-speed Aerial Ropeways are the answer. Ski-lifts or gondolas are the things that hang off the aerial ropeway. All the engineering is in the ropeway, so that’s what the engineers call them.

Montreal will install one soon, mostly for transport, and a little bit of tourism. The Montreal people cite huge greenhouse and environmental benefits. Greenhouse because the nett momentum of the ropeway is close to zero. (Goings are about the same as comings, so it takes only a small amount of energy to keep it all spinning. Like a travelator.) Environmental impact is very low, because posts are about four square metres, and placed about every seventy metres.

We’d need a little innovation to develop junctions, so that gondolas could join and leave, using spur lines. A little GPS and microwave electronics, and we’re away with a world first.

What would it cost? A lot less than a highway.

So, look forward to a leather-seated personal gondola parked in your garage.

Hells_Bells74 Hells_Bells74 10:33 am 20 Jun 09

I just realised I was in the archives.. normally try to keep my thoughts to myself when it’s been a month almost since the last comments. Oops again..

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site