16 December 2024

MyWay+ the latest tech embarrassment for government, and it's got to stop

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
38

Not so simple: MyWay+ issues are part of a pattern of tech snafus for government. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

What is it with IT tenders?

Sure, tech stuff is complex and way beyond most people’s limited comprehension, but these digital solutions are touted as long-time money savers that provide services at our fingertips.

In short, they are supposed to make our lives easier.

Yet, recent history in the ACT shows that not only do they end up costing us a motza, much more than the government expected, but in at least one case, there was nothing to show for $78 million, and in another, millions unaccounted for, or in the recent MyWay+ launch, the results are literally patchy.

READ ALSO ‘Radioactive distraction’: Dutton’s nuclear costings reignite energy debate

The Auditor-General’s take on the Digital Health Record procurement blowout – $66 million to $110 million – again highlights the perils of these tech tenders that promise so much but leave the taxpayer drained and empty-handed to boot.

The $78 million HR write-off, the Digital Health Record blowout and now the MyWay+ troubles are all highly embarrassing for the ACT Government, which appears to be held to ransom by tech firms who find wriggle room in their contractual obligations.

When problems emerge, contracts tend to get varied until the cost becomes so great that, like in the HR instance, government finally pulls the plug to cut its losses.

With MyWay+, it is still early days, but how long before NEC says that to make the system work the way it was supposed to, it will take more than updates and patches, and the $64 million contract will need to be upgraded?

At that point, one starts to wonder if just making the service free would be simpler and less expensive than building an elaborate architecture full of holes that need to be repaired.

Transport Canberra insists the system is settling down, but it does not say what is still going wrong. Those on the ground say MyWay+ is far from being there yet, and the issues run far deeper than what the government is willing to admit.

An Assembly committee has been given a wide brief to investigate the MyWay replacement program from go to whoa.

With both the now unrestrained Greens and the Canberra Liberals with strong political motivation to make life tough for Transport Minister Chris Steel and the government amid strong public interest, the inquiry hearings and findings should provide plenty of headlines and fascinating detail.

READ ALSO Worries for Steel as breadth of MyWay+ inquiry unveiled

Mr Steel’s political career may be on the line if the final report is damning. And you can bet the Auditor-General will want to take a look at it as well.

But the fallout from these digital failures goes much further. The public may lose faith in technology to solve practical problems and in government to manage such projects.

It is a big challenge for any government and the public service because of the huge amounts of taxpayer money involved and the potential productivity gains foregone.

The ACT Government needs to get on top of this.

Join the conversation

38
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Can’t believe Canberra people.
We get FREE transport but we still complain. IDIOTS

A Canberra Liberal is not an oxymoron5:43 pm 17 Dec 24

The system should never have been proceeded with in the first place. Why spend $70 million to collect $23 million annually? Transport Canberra already runs hugely subsidized by the taxpayer.
The biggest question is why was it ever implemented in the first place?
On the face of it, free transport would actually have been cheaper for taxpayers than this!
Politicians make some really stupid decisions time and again. And time and again, they keep getting re elected.

Without wishing to downplay the incompetence of the ACT government and bureaucracy in managing these sort of projects, I’d say that such incompetence is repeatedly demonstrated to varying degrees by all governments across Australia. The ACT is certainly not unique. In general government + IT = screwup.

Optus, Banks, CrowdStrike, and so on have all had mere update failures, with massive disruptions up to world wide. If, with enormous expertise available to them, they can’t always get even mere maintenance right, then isn’t it a bit of an over-reach to expect the ACT Government to do a lot better with whole new systems?
Ministers and elected Members are not automatically selected and voted in on outstanding IT expertise, nor is it reasonable to expect the Ministers to over-ride their Departments, and Contracts with micro-management. Infuriating as events are, the Ministers and Government should be, to be fair, cut some slack. One does wonder how the alternative potential Government(s) would have done it better. Especially if consultants and private sector contractors would be the go-to solutions.

Consider the phenomenon that most successful IT projects are created, managed, and maintained by techies for themselves.

HiddenDragon9:08 pm 16 Dec 24

“With both the now unrestrained Greens and the Canberra Liberals with strong political motivation to make life tough for Transport Minister Chris Steel and the government amid strong public interest…..”

In the interests of Canberra’s (very) long-suffering rates/taxpayers, let’s hope this is a sign of things to come and that the novel experience of being exposed to something approximating real accountability will have a suitably sobering effect on a government and a bureaucracy with a chronic addiction to biting off more than they can chew.

I’d like to see the Auditor-General have a look at all the books regarding the tram’s actual costs. Total costs, not just the construction and tram purchase costs.

Tom Worthington4:12 pm 16 Dec 24

Building computer based systems is very difficult. As a result many, perhaps most, such projects fail. We persist with digital solutions as when they do work they provide convenience and save money. But building them is really, really hard.

To build such systems you need staff and contractors with high level of expertise and experience. In the past I have worked on failed projects, later reviewed project for government to see which should be cancelled and later still acted as an expert witness in court cases when they weren’t cancelled in time.

Now I help train computer project students. They get to work in teams on small projects for real clients. Here thy can experience all of the frustrations of a project, in a safe environment. The ACT Government and its suppliers can hire those graduates.

I wonder if they take into count if elderly of disabled have mobility problems

in democracy you get the government you deserve. If you voted for them your stuck with them. Why do you think they did not release it before the election. My guess is they suspected it would be a dogs breakfast.

GrumpyGrandpa3:05 pm 16 Dec 24

As a frequent bus traveller, MyWay+ seems to have been overthought.
There are too many new features offered that the whole system appears to have been complex to design and too complex for consumers to use.
It would have been better to introduce a clone of MyWay, then over time add additional features. Alternatively, adopt Opal.
In the real world, anyone who has overseen as many disasters as Minister Steele, would be given their marching orders. Even in politics, you would expect a responsible Minister would be relieved of their portfolio.
The thing here is that these are taxpayer’s money that are being wasted.

ChrisinTurner2:02 pm 16 Dec 24

Imagine if the same process was allowed to happen to air-traffic-control software?

Reminds me of the UK Post Office

“The public may lose faith … and in government to manage such projects.” That horse has well and truly bolted. When will government take responsibility? When will the Transport Minister lose his job over the botched MyWay+?

Darryl Guise3:29 pm 16 Dec 24

Why? It has worked for most of us and was produced by private industry.

Gregg Heldon8:31 am 16 Dec 24

Chris Steele. It All leads back to him. CIT. The HR tech failure. Now My Way.
He needs to go but won’t because…. who else has Barr got?
And if Steele was to go completely (quit the Assembly), then count back gives his seat to the Libs, I believe. Happy to be told otherwise though.

@Gregg Heldon
On final preference distribution(https://www.elections.act.gov.au/elections/previous-assembly-elections/2024-election/distribution-of-preferences-2024/table2_Murrumbidgee-FINAL.pdf), the Liberal’s Amardeep SINGH was the last non-elected candidate to be excluded in Steel’s Murrumbidgee electorate.

So, I think you are right, if Steel was to go, assuming Singh is still interested in taking up the position, he would be the replacement on count back. Also happy to be told otherwise.

Gregg Heldon7:10 pm 17 Dec 24

How many more lives has Steele got then?
Ah, the Joys of a minority Government.

Software creation and implementation seems to be multiple iterations of write, test, re-write, test etc. Engineers are getting paid $100s per hour to do this without there being much accountability for getting it correct each time. Chuck in a couple of changes to business requirements during the process, it’s no wonder there’s cost blowouts.

There would appear to be a common thread to all of these stuff ups, including the CIT debacle – Chris Steel. Getting rid of him would be a quick way to improve the budget!

Equally common thread. All undertaken by private industry no doubt touting their superior expertise, capability, and experience.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.