18 January 2024

New Casey Market Town fast chargers a 'paradigm change' for electric vehicle infrastructure

| Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
152
Evie Networks CEO Chris Mills and Emissions Reduction Minister Shane Rattenbury

The Casey Market Town site is Evie Networks’ 200th site nationally, a milestone celebrated by CEO Chris Mills (left) and Water, Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister Shane Rattenbury. Photo: Supplied.

Casey Market Town is the latest Canberra location to be fitted with fast chargers as the electric vehicle (EV) uptake continues accelerating in the capital.

The four new charging bays, powered by two DC fast chargers from Evie Networks, are the first for the area.

Water, Energy and Emissions Minister Shane Rattenbury said while 12 to 18 months ago the ACT had been lagging when it came to EV charging infrastructure, the Territory had cleared the backlog.

“Certainly, I’ve seen fewer complaints coming in recent times … about the lack of charging infrastructure,” he said.

“We are seeing a growth in [electric] vehicles, so we need to keep increasing the number of charging [bays] available.”

There are already 160 charging bays across the ACT, powered by 135 chargers, provided by government and private enterprises.

The government wants to have 180 chargers built by 2025.

fast charging station at Casey Market Town

Four charging bays are available at Casey Market Town. Photo: Supplied.

Mr Rattenbury said the focus was on making sure chargers weren’t just located in Civic and town centres but were also available in smaller precincts.

He highlighted Casey Market Town as an example where the business’s initiative was meeting customer demand.

“This is something businesses across Canberra should be having a look at. Customers out there need to be able to charge their cars. They’re looking for the convenience,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“This is a terrific opportunity. You can pull up here, charge your car while you go across the road, do your shopping and have a coffee.

“There’s a good selection of shops here, and people can easily come and charge their vehicle while going about their weekly or daily business. That is an ideal set-up. That’s exactly the kind of convenience we want.”

READ ALSO Expansion of on-demand bus would benefit some, but researchers warn against going full-speed ahead

The Casey Market Town chargers are suitable for all types of EVs with CCS2 and CHAdeMO plugs, joining government-funded DC fast charging sites at the Royal Australian Mint and Hotel Realm.

However, there has been criticism that higher-density areas like Belconnen are missing out on public chargers.

The government has launched the Residential Strata EV Ready Pilot Study to explore installing EV chargers in apartment buildings, but Mr Rattenbury acknowledged not everyone could charge at home and that more infrastructure needed to be rolled out.

It’s not clear where the next public chargers will be built, but Evie Networks CEO Chris Mills said preparations were underway to build in Deakin and across the border in Queanbeyan.

“Certainly, with the more progressive policies coming out across [all levels] of government, we are seeing the take-up of electric vehicles is accelerating,” he said.

“Getting the infrastructure out there to give [people] the confidence, not only of the availability of the network but also the geographic spread, is really important.”

READ ALSO Warmer, dryer and roomier: ACT adopts new national building rules

Technologies are continuing to progress in the EV space, with Toyota previously signalling it wanted to roll out solid-state battery EVs globally before 2030.

These batteries are projected to last longer and take less time to charge than current options.

This has raised questions about what reinvestment might be needed in the EV charging space.

But Mr Mills said not all chargers will need to be replaced as technology changes.

He explained some places are more suited for slow chargers, such as outside restaurants or movie theatres, while highways would be places where faster charging would be expected for a “petrol-like experience”.

“So there’s a use case for each of those various types of chargers, so you don’t necessarily look to replace all existing ACT chargers [as things change],” Mr Mills said.

“That said, for us to change ACT chargers to make them faster in those locations that make sense … we would need to look at the availability of the electrical connection and whether or not the infrastructure would support the increased speed of the chargers.”

As for what’s available now, he said the Casey location ticked the boxes needed for customer experience when charging – it was safe and secure, accessible, and with good lighting and amenities while charging.

“It’s a paradigm change from petrol, where you went to the petrol station to get your petrol,” Mr Mills said.

“Now you do your shopping, and while you’re there, you get your charge.”

Join the conversation

152
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Gregg Heldon10:34 am 21 Jan 24

I’m amazed that Rattenbury knew where Casey was. Or did he have to be driven there?
Name three suburbs in West Belconnen, West Gungahlin or Tuggeranong Shane. Without assistance. Bet you can’t.

@Greg Heldon
While I’m not a fan of Rattenbury on any count, I fail to see the relevance of your comment.

As a long term Tuggeranong resident I would struggle to name any suburbs in West Belconnen or West Gunghalin … nevertheless, again – relevance to anything?

Gregg Heldon1:24 pm 21 Jan 24

Just interesting to see him out of his north Canberra bubble.

@Grekg Heldon
Sounds like a cheap shot to me, but if you say so.

Gregg Heldon9:48 am 22 Jan 24

Yep. It was.

Evie have increasing their supercharging prices. Petrol and diesel prices go up and down. Electricity prices never come down on superchargers:
https://www.drive.com.au/news/australian-electric-car-charging-networks-increase-prices/ – Feb 2023
https://thedriven.io/2023/07/11/evie-jacks-up-ev-charging-prices-due-to-rising-cost-of-energy/ – Jul 2023
https://autotalk.com.au/news/evie-public-ev-charger-price-increase – Jan 2024

You mean petrol prices have fallen over the last decade?

Or just another useless comment you wanted to make?

Here’s an explanation. This bloke is an engineer and lawyer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS9p48poss4

Explaining the inutilities of coal-fired power. Thanks.

So you believe that money collected from fuel excise paid at bowsers goes directly to building and maintaining roads? No – it goes into consolidated revenue, and from there funding is allocated in numerous directions, including capital projects unrelated to roads.

Do you know what else goes into the pool? GST, stamp duty, luxury car tax (and even cheap EVs may fall under that given their higher cost) and so on, also goes into the pool. And guess which of those taxes are applied on EV purchase and every time one is charged up at a third-party charger? All of them.

Do your research first before perpetuating the same social media rubbish.

My EV was bought to stealth ICE’rs. No range anxiety around Canberra. No biggy charging off peak. EVs are a blast 🏁

GrumpyGrandpa5:15 pm 20 Jan 24

Paul Maric from CarExpert has recently done a YouTube video answering criticisms of his EV vs ICE comparison.

The original video was based on 2 exactly the same BMWs; one ICE and one EV to remove variables.

He also verbally compared his own Telsa vs a Rav4 and in that case too, the EV was also more expensive to run.

One of the key points he made was that, sure, if people mapped out their trip to maximise free chargers (and partial charged from home) an EV could be cheaper, but if you just travelling from A to B and topping up where you could to avoid range anxiety, the EV would be more expensive. His comparison was done before the recent increases in pricing for fast charging.

After watching both videos, I believe that his approach was balanced.

EVs certainly have merit around town, if you can plug in at home or take advantage of your solar panels, but on a roadtrip, an ICE just might be better option.

Watch his videos.

There are plenty cheaper options than purposely chosen. But even if the best/available options for charging made it more expensive for a road trip, the price and convenience of charging at home more than balances that out.

Yes, but where do you do most of your driving? You’d only do road trips occasionally, unless you need to drive city-to-city regularly for your job.

Otherwise, it’s Evie which has heavily increased their prices, to the extent I’ll be avoiding that brand. Sadly though, if you own a non-Tesla EV then you’re reliant (at this point) on charging with either Evie or Chargefox on the road.

2024 will be an exciting year for new EVs, and the second-hand market will certainly grow. But until charging options reach critical mass in regional areas (there’s chargers to be built in Hay, for example, and Yass now has an additional 12 Tesla superchargers – 12!), ICE will alway look more attractive for travelling long distances.

“I believe that his approach was balanced”

Really.

Plan a comparison as follows: Plan something not representing over 99% of all vehicle trips. Choose those conditions to specifically disadvantage one vehicle while specifically advantaging the other*. Then, ignore the free or near free prior (and optional post-) fill-ups for one vehicle (neither an option for the other) and add maximum cost charging including wasting time over-charging instead.

I don’t even own an EV nor have immediate plans to buy one, yet anyone ought to be able to see the problems in that “test”.

* If you do not recognise what were the “specific [dis]advantages” to which I referred, you lack knowledge of the subject in the first place.

It’s a hopelessly biassed and tendentious “test”. By the way, both illustrated very bad (albeit prevalent) driving habits, often one hand on the wheel, looking vaguely about, using now-illegal hand held communication.

GrumpyGrandpa8:40 pm 21 Jan 24

Hi byline,
In a follow-up up video Paul Maric explained the rationale for the comparison video.
He acknowledged that for around the city, an EV is cheaper to run, particularly if you have solar at home etc.
He also said that if you were inclined to seek out free charging, extend your travel time and route, the EV’s running costs would be lower than in their comparison test.

His comparison was specific – get in your car and go. The BMWs were identical cars, except for the type of motor. He was trying to compare apples with apples.

This may not represent how typical EV drivers use their cars. I get that, but town driving and long road trips are different things. Even if you could charge for “free” using panels before you left home, you’d would be paying full-price on the way home.

There also seem to be a number of commentators arguing that they would seek out free charging. I’m not sure why people think their “fuel” source should be “free”? Someone has to pay for it, why not the user?

Maric’s argument was that if you are driving on a long trip, like Sydney to Melbourne with the family, you are more likely to be wanting to minimise your travel time and using fast chargers, avoiding range anxiety etc.
I think we all know what long trips are like with kids on board – you just want to get there.

I’m not anti-EV. In fact, I like the concept.
We have an old ICE and at some stage, I expect we’ll buy an EV or similar. hope our next car will be an EV. However, but in the absence of “free” chargers or being able to charge at home, the cost of charging is currently more expensive than petrol.

There also seem to be a number of commentators arguing that they would seek out free charging.

Paul Maric gave the same comparison using his own Telsa vs a Rav4.

Grumpy Grandpa,
If you can’t see how the comparison doesn’t consider the simple, real life behavioural choices that would significantly reduce the EVs trip cost then you’re just being blinkered.

“His comparison was specific – get in your car and go. The BMWs were identical cars, except for the type of motor. He was trying to compare apples with apples.”

Yes, the choices he made were specific. And almost all of them to the detriment of the EV cost, making it not remotely a like for like comparison.

It’s presenting an extreme and one sided example as if it represents a typical and common trip, where people wouldn’t even attempt to reduce their fuel costs through basic planning and deliberately choose the most expensive option.

It simply doesn’t reflect a common, real world situation.

“This may not represent how typical EV drivers use their cars”
No, it is not how 99% of ALL car drivers use their cars, whether EV or ICE.

The supposed comparison tells us that on rare occasions you have the potential to save one or two cents per km provided that you would otherwise act highly inefficiently (and I wholly disregard ‘free’ charging; even at home costs something) after an extravagant car choice which probably denies any concern with costs in the first place.

Paul Maric telling us he can construct a situation where short term cost is higher for EV is like us we can spend more on food at a restaurant than making dinner at home. In fact, the latter would be more relevant to daily life even though still a less probable event.

The whole of life cost savings for EV are real, regardless of where cost lumpiness falls from manufacturing through operating to disposal. Also, contrary to a weird post in another sub-thread here, you do not need an ICE to travel.

Capital Retro5:09 pm 20 Jan 24

If the transition to EVs is so self-fulfilling as Rattenbury says then why do the taxpayers (most of whom will never own an EV) have to pay for the infrastructure?

Ah, they don’t? This article is about an Evie installation.

Capital Retro2:14 pm 21 Jan 24

Do you mean an Evie installation on an ActewAGL structure?

Look at the leading image and report back to me.

@Capital Retro
I’d expect Evie are leasing or in some other way reimbursing ActewAGL in a commercial arrangement for the use of their infrastructure. So, while ACT Government has a share of the company, it’s still a ‘for profit’ enterprise and as such ACT taxpayers wouldn’t be out of pocket here.

Capital Retro10:36 pm 21 Jan 24

I expect that response means you are clutching at straws again, JS.

Still waiting for StuartM to report back.

@Capital Retro
Despite the fact that the article states that the chargers have been provided by businesses, you query why taxpayers have to pay for the infrastructure. And I’m the one ‘clutching at straws’, CR?
Ok, whatever you say.

Capital Retro12:10 pm 22 Jan 24

The article clearly says the chargers are “government-funded”.

The lengths you go to to defend the government makes me wonder if you are “government-funded” as well.

@Capital Retro
Geez, CR, do I actually have to read the article for you? You are obviously incapable of doing so.
“The four new charging bays, powered by two DC fast chargers from Evie Networks, are the first for the area.”
“He highlighted Casey Market Town as an example where the business’s initiative was meeting customer demand.”
“There are already 160 charging bays across the ACT, powered by 135 chargers, provided by government and private enterprises.” – note ‘and private enterprises’, as in this case.

… and I’m not defending the government at all – just correcting yet another of your falsehoods.

I went to the Casey shops, already noticed one of these chargers was being fixed by an electrican

3 weeks after opening half of the chargers won’t be working properly

And Evie has just put up their charging prices around 40% like all the other public EV infrastructure charger owners. Absolute irony still is that people are charging their EV’s at these charging stations from electricity that comes from fossil fuel power generation. Also if you can afford the minimum $6,000 cost you can put charging infrastructure in your garage avoiding the queue at Evie. Then property owners get the insurance levy on their household insurance because of the increased fire risk associated with home charging….. FACT!

@Rob
… and despite all of that negativity, Rob, EVs are still cheaper over the life of the vehicle than a comparable ICE. And the good thing that as the EV technology continues to improve the gap will get even wider.

Actually pretty light on facts. Charging is possible from a standard 10amp outlet sufficient for the average daily commute. $6000 is at the higher end of charger installation. Electric car fires are rare – rarer than ICE fires. https://www.evfiresafe.com/ for accurate info. Irony is driving a fuel burning car with upstream emissions that extend half way around the world and using grid mix electricity at home while pointing the finger at electric cars (that produce no tailpipe emissions) for using power from the same source.

Rob, there’s actually little to no FACT in your comment. Firstly, the electricity is from multiple sources including renewable energy, and the proportion will change over coming years.

Secondly, where did you get $6,000 from? What clap trap – you can plug your EV into a standard power socket if you need to and charge overnight. Further, a sparkie can install a dedicated 30a circuit to your garage if need be for waaaaay less than that (depending on distance from your meter, of course).

And finally, if you did your research properly, you will find that most Lithium battery fires occur with cheap scooter or ebike batteries, and the few EV battery fires (in comparison) have occured from damaged battery packs (noting most car battery packs are in a reinforced structure). The issue is that many inexpensive lithium battery packs are sold without over-charge protection, whereas all EV packs are “smart”. Reputable insurance companies are more concerned with charging scooters and ebikes than EVs.

After reading through this am not real sure if the recharge is a freebie ?
A bit of a way to travel to Casey, but worth it if no charge.

It’s ok. I have a pic of a Tesla plugged into a random powerpoint at Westfield Woden, so some EV owners are getting freebies.

Merc, it’s an Evie installation so chargable. When in doubt, download Plugshare to your phone and check the location description.

Elle Cehcker11:52 am 20 Jan 24

Charging an ev is actually more expensive than filling up on petrol and its getting worse….

https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-comparisons/900km-560-mile-electric-v-petrol-challenge-same-cars-same-driving-which-was-cheaper

What a bright future indeed.

And you believed that cherry picked article!!! … FACT check and you’ll see that the review chose the most inefficient EV against a very efficient ICE vehicle.
The review failed to acknowledge that the first 450 kms would have been charging from home at minimal cost (or zero cost if solar was used) compared to supercharging.
The reviewer also decided to charge on the road to 100% … no EV driver does that as it takes twice as long to charge the remaining 80% to 100% … charging to 80% takes 15 – 30mins .. just in time to have a bathroom break, cup of coffee, pie and treat the kids to a Maccas meal (while your car is charging) … then set off again fresh for the next 400 kms

@Elle Cehcker
Really? https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/are-electric-cars-cheaper-to-run-than-petrol-or-diesel-cars/

We can all cherry pick an instance, but it doesn’t prove an argument. And it even says in the article you refenced, “Being a road trip, you don’t have the luxury of charging at home where you may have solar or off-peak charge rates.”

GrumpyGrandpa4:59 pm 20 Jan 24

Paul Maric from CarExpert has recently done a YouTube video answering criticisms, such as yours.
The original video was based on 2 BMWs, because he wanted 2 exactly

Capital Retro5:12 pm 20 Jan 24

I can’t believe all you save the planet virtue signalers actually still eat Maccas and pies!

Evil.

GrumpyGrandpa. Paul Maric rationalised his choices. He failed entirely to validate his test design or utility. They are quite different things.

Capital Retro, please keep up with the mass of ordinary people moving further ahead of you.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.