Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

New crime maps from ACT Policing

By johnboy - 24 February 2012 19

crime maps

Simon Corbell has announced a new crime map:

Mr Corbell launched ACT Policing’s latest web tool today at the ActewAGL Royal Canberra Show and said it was a great way to provide the community crime statistics by suburb, draw comparisons between suburbs and view crime trends over the past five years in a quick, easy and accurate way.

“It is important for the community to have access to accurate data on crime trends in a user-friendly format, and these maps make it easier to for people to understand crime trends in their area,” Mr Corbell said.

“Property crime is an area of criminality that is a concern to Canberrans, and the latest report card on policing services in the Territory shows a significant downward trend.

“Over the 2010-11 financial year, motor vehicle theft is down 37 per cent, burglary down 32 per cent and robbery down 22 percent.

“This is evidence that having a single source of data can allay misconceptions and fears about crime in our community.”

The maps are up on the ACT Policing website

Yikes! look at Belconnen go for Traffic infringements!

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
19 Responses to
New crime maps from ACT Policing
IrishPete 9:19 pm 24 Feb 12

To use this kind of information, you need to know the suburb’s background. Say for example there are a lot of assaults in Mitchell – well, it has a juvenile detention centre, so it would be no surprise. As a mainly industrial suburb, it has a very small residential population, making rates per head of population astronomically high.

Drug seizures in Hume? Try the car park at the prison.

Car thefts from Pialligo? Well, we leave cars parked there for weeks at the airport (though actually, the airport seems to be excluded from the map), and almost no-one lives there.

Assaults in Civic? Well, it’s full of intoxicated people after dark, and again few people live there so the rates per population are really high.

Single incidents can also have a big effect – vehicle-related deaths in Fyshwick – MULLY!

Statistics aren’t facts – they need interpretation.

For crimes of low frequency, being able to aggregate quarters to years or multiple years would be good, but I coudn’t work out how to do that.

Here endeth the patronising lesson.

IP

yellowsnow 9:14 pm 24 Feb 12

drfelonious said :

I missed the homicide in Holder that is listed as having occurred in 2011? No reference to it in a search of Google or even on this site.

if you look at the ACT policing definition of homicide on the mapping tool, you’ll see homicide includes murder, manslaughter and attempted murder. There was an axe wielding man around in Holder last year that got shot in the leg by police (and survived). Maybe he (or the person he was threatening to axe, presumably his partner) was the one ‘homicide’ statistic. I’m vaguely aware of another ‘incident’ in the suburb, but ultimately it was determined there were no ‘suspicious circumstances involved’ (police lingo for suicide)

Henry82 8:48 pm 24 Feb 12

Wow, Acton trumps most suburbs i plugged in. I suspect that has something to do with it’s distance from the city.

M0les 8:47 pm 24 Feb 12

Wow, an entire press-release in Gill Sans, that’s bold!

gooterz 6:42 pm 24 Feb 12

Its no wonder not many people live in Hume or Mitchell

The rates per 1000 population are:
Incident type Mitchell Hume
Homicide 0.00 0.00
Assault 2800.00 3500.00
Sexual assault 200.00 500.00
Offences against a person 0.00 0.00
Burglary 4400.00 6250.00
Robbery 200.00 0.00
Theft (excluding Motor Vehicles) 10200.00 11750.00
Motor vehicle theft 1800.00 1500.00
Property damage 7200.00 9000.00
Other offences 17200.00 23000.00
Traffic Infringement Notices 78000.00 131000.00
Road fatality 0.00 0.00
Road collision with injury 800.00 1250.00

Surely Rates per Area would be more appropriate

Innovation 6:00 pm 24 Feb 12

Very interesting map. I may have missed it but Oaks Estate and Duntroon appear to be missing.

dtc 4:07 pm 24 Feb 12

So my brief analysis suggests Forest, Chapman/Duffy, Macquarie and Macarthur are, relative to population, the lowest crime areas. But with O’Malley/Isaacs taking first prize

drfelonious 3:27 pm 24 Feb 12

I missed the homicide in Holder that is listed as having occurred in 2011? No reference to it in a search of Google or even on this site.

shadow boxer 3:22 pm 24 Feb 12

If you untick TIN’s to take the speed cameras out of the mix it reads much better.

Cool map though…

johnboy 3:07 pm 24 Feb 12

the effect on real estate prices on Catchpole street macquarie would be dramatic!

chewy14 3:05 pm 24 Feb 12

JonahBologna said :

As a spatial analyst, these maps are not very good. Crime is not the sort of phenomena that is suited to mapping at the suburb level.

I agree, I wish they were at street or block level.

That would be cool.

Tooks 2:51 pm 24 Feb 12

JonahBologna said :

As a spatial analyst, these maps are not very good. Crime is not the sort of phenomena that is suited to mapping at the suburb level.

Example 1:
If I steal a car at the ABC flats (Braddon), then smash it into another car in Civic, and then torch it in Deakin which suburb gets the stats?

Example 2:
There aren’t a lot of people that have addresses in Civic, so you can assume that the crimes aren’t committed by people that live there. Wouldn’t you like to know where the criminals live?

Example 1: Not sure how they’re doing their stats, but I’d imagine Braddon would get the SMV stat, Civic would get the prang stat, and Deakin would get the recovered SMV/arson stat.

Example 2: Personally, I care more about where the crooks are working than where they’re living.

qbngeek 2:41 pm 24 Feb 12

JonahBologna said :

As a spatial analyst, these maps are not very good. Crime is not the sort of phenomena that is suited to mapping at the suburb level.

Example 1:
If I steal a car at the ABC flats (Braddon), then smash it into another car in Civic, and then torch it in Deakin which suburb gets the stats?

Example 2:
There aren’t a lot of people that have addresses in Civic, so you can assume that the crimes aren’t committed by people that live there. Wouldn’t you like to know where the criminals live?

Answer 1
A theft logged in Braddon, dangerous driving (or similar) logged in Civic and an arson loged in Deakin.

Three different crimes in three different locations.

The second one is harder to overcome.

JonahBologna 2:28 pm 24 Feb 12

As a spatial analyst, these maps are not very good. Crime is not the sort of phenomena that is suited to mapping at the suburb level.

Example 1:
If I steal a car at the ABC flats (Braddon), then smash it into another car in Civic, and then torch it in Deakin which suburb gets the stats?

Example 2:
There aren’t a lot of people that have addresses in Civic, so you can assume that the crimes aren’t committed by people that live there. Wouldn’t you like to know where the criminals live?

Chop71 2:23 pm 24 Feb 12

WOW

Charnwood V Nicholls

Can’t be true

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au

Search across the site