23 October 2013

No jail time for the sex skypers

| johnboy
Join the conversation
30

The ABC reports that Daniel McDonald and Dylan Deblaquiere will serve no jail time for their grotty capers at ADFA, merely suffer ruined lives:

Today in the ACT Supreme Court, Justice John Neild handed McDonald two 12-month good behaviour bonds and Deblaquiere one 12-month good behaviour bond.

Deblaquiere has already left the military, while it is understood the ADF will make a decision about McDonald’s ongoing employment now that the sentence has been handed down.

Join the conversation

30
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Nothing excuses the behaviour of McDonald and Deblaquiere – the two are grubs of the highest order. Whether they deserved prison or not is rightly a decision for the Courts, the only entity that has seen all the evidence and is able to weigh all the issues before making a decision.

The comments from ‘contributors’ Robertson and Masquara are deserving of a response – if only to address the factual inaccuracies. McDonald is about to be discharged from the Australian Defence Force so he will not be welcomed back to ADFA to continue his studies. Even had he been acquitted it would be very unlikely he would have been returned to ADFA – if nothing else he would be too old to recommence as a first year so some other solution would have been required. Further, had the civil criminal case failed both individuals almost certainly would have faced the military system which would have ended in their discharge from the service.

Contrary to Robertson’s statements ADFA hasn’t been operating for over 30 years. It opened in 1986 and since then over 6500 young men and women have graduated and commenced careers in the ADF. A number of those officers have been killed, wounded or injured serving overseas in war zones or in the inevitable training accidents that occur. I would be very keen to see Robertson stand in front of the families and friends of the dead and injured and repeat his claim that their sons/daughters/mates were ‘revolting little grots’ or not ‘real soldiers’.Stating that ‘ADFA and its grots has very little to do with the people who risk their lives to defend our country and its values’ is grammatically incorrect, factually wrong and clearly highlights the author’s half-witted ignorance. It’s also relevant to note that both of these morons (McDonald and Deblaquiere) had been at ADFA for a grand total of 8 weeks. That strongly suggests their behaviour had much more to do with who they were before joining Defence then any influence cultural issues at ADFA may have had.

Smearing all ADFA cadets and graduates as ‘revolting grots’ is grossly unfair and akin to stating that all RiotAct keyboard warriors are gutless, brainless toads who contribute nothing and steal valuable oxygen with every breath they take. While that may be true for the Robertson’s of this world the reality is it isn’t representative of 99.9% of other contributors.

Stevian said :

Robertson said :

Deref said :

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This tells us everything that we need to know about ADFA.

ADFA has been a haven for revolting little grots for at least the last 30 years. Defence is full of ex-ADFA graduates continuing to exude their worthless values on all about them.

I’m reminded of something written if memory serves by Rudyard Kipling

It’s “Tommy this” and “Tommy that”
and “Tommy by and by”
But it’s “God Bless you Mr Atkins”
when the bullets start to fly

(That from memory so may not be precise, but it’s close enough)

Oh look – somebody who confuses real soldiers with ADFA cadets.

ADFA and its grots has very little to do with the people who risk their lives to defend our country and its values….as demonstrated by this episode.

Robertson said :

Deref said :

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This tells us everything that we need to know about ADFA.

ADFA has been a haven for revolting little grots for at least the last 30 years. Defence is full of ex-ADFA graduates continuing to exude their worthless values on all about them.

I’m reminded of something written if memory serves by Rudyard Kipling

It’s “Tommy this” and “Tommy that”
and “Tommy by and by”
But it’s “God Bless you Mr Atkins”
when the bullets start to fly

(That from memory so may not be precise, but it’s close enough)

http://faxmentis.org/html/kipling.html

“For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, wait outside”;
But it’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide,
The troopship’s on the tide, my boys, the troopship’s on the tide,
O it’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide.”

Deref said :

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This tells us everything that we need to know about ADFA.

ADFA has been a haven for revolting little grots for at least the last 30 years. Defence is full of ex-ADFA graduates continuing to exude their worthless values on all about them.

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

Source please?

thebrownstreak699:18 am 24 Oct 13

miz said :

This court result sends a poor message – even if you get caught, society will impose zero consequences. I am appalled.

The court has been sending this message for quite a while in the ACT. Unfortunately.

Masquara said :

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This is s***.

Shame we can’t we spell out “s***” when we have the s***s and are describing s***s …

Not only do Public Service computers block emails containing naughty words, now they check if you are entering them at the keyboard while you type…

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This tells us everything that we need to know about ADFA.

This court result sends a poor message – even if you get caught, society will impose zero consequences. I am appalled.

Queen_of_the_Bun12:04 am 24 Oct 13

steveu said :

These fellas learnt a painful lesson. Incredible how Gillard created legislation and got it through in a week to get the men brought before the courts. God help them if it was rape. Which it wasn’t. It does appear to be fraternisation as well which I’m pretty sure is frowned upon at ADFA. I would presume the victim in this case would be brought to account for her part in the act. Not that she would ever be named as it may harm her reputation.

Not sure that they have learnt a painful lesson:

While detailing the facts of the case, Acting Justice Nield noted the pair’s actions were vulgar and they had not expressed remorse.

“Neither offender said anything to the complainant when what had happened became known to show regret or remorse for what they did,” he said.

“Neither stood up in court after the complainant read her victim impact statement to say they regret what they did.”

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-23/sentence-expected-in-adf-skype-sex-case/5039296?section=act

Queen_of_the_Bun11:41 pm 23 Oct 13

caf said :

steveu said :

caf said :

Please point out exactly what legislation you are referring to. It is my understanding that they were charged under existing ACT statutes.

I will not point out exactly which legislation I am referring to, however I will refer you to the charge of “using a carriage service in a way which was offensive” which was I believe enacted through commonwealth legislation.

(http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/adfa-skype-scandal-cadets-sentenced-avoid-jail-20131023-2w0hz.html#ixzz2iWaMqtdX)

Yes, that is indeed a part of Commonwealth legislation, but it certainly wasn’t rushed through for this case – that part of the Criminal Code was last amended in 2004.

(The “act of indecency” that McDonald was additionally found guilty of is under ACT law).

Well said.

Of course steveu won’t outline the legislation he is talking about, because he’s talking bollocks.

Masquara said :

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This is s***.

Shame we can’t we spell out “s***” when we have the s*** and are describing s***s …

steveu said :

caf said :

Please point out exactly what legislation you are referring to. It is my understanding that they were charged under existing ACT statutes.

I will not point out exactly which legislation I am referring to, however I will refer you to the charge of “using a carriage service in a way which was offensive” which was I believe enacted through commonwealth legislation.

(http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/adfa-skype-scandal-cadets-sentenced-avoid-jail-20131023-2w0hz.html#ixzz2iWaMqtdX)

Yes, that is indeed a part of Commonwealth legislation, but it certainly wasn’t rushed through for this case – that part of the Criminal Code was last amended in 2004.

(The “act of indecency” that McDonald was additionally found guilty of is under ACT law).

Apparently one of the perpetrators is being welcomed back to continue his ADFA studies.

This is s***.

steveu said :

The point I have made is that these fellas have learnt their lesson, and been punished.

But do not forget that ‘fraternisation’ is as pointed out by Thumper, is grounds for disciplinary action. She did get into an ‘arrangement’ with one of the guys. These men did the wrong thing. But so did she.

She did a wrong thing in agreeing to have sex with the bloke, which is Not OK, as far as the military is concerned, but young people having sex is not exactly headline news for the rest of us. Yes, the military have different standards etc etc, but still…

He did a vile and disgusting and treacherous betrayal of trust and intimacy, which I reckon is probably Not OK for anybody in the community. Equating what she did with what he did is fatuous.

If some bloke did that to my daughter I’d give him a beating.

And if I understand other reports correctly, one of these turds was also responsible for forcing other young men to engage in homosexual acts as part of becoming involved with the ADFA rugby team. WTF is that about? I worked at ADFA for a couple of years, and I’m wondering what the hell is going on out at that place?

p1 said :

Deref said :

Australia’s finest.

These guys are to the officers of the ADF what first year law students are to judges.

Well said.

Yes, gentlemen, having consensual sex that’s against your workplace rules is just as bad as filming it and showing it to various third parties without the consent of your partner.

It’s the sex that was the problem here, not the unapproved pornography. In fact, I am looking at naked pictures of your sister right now. She’s a slut for letting this happen to her.

steveu said :

Incredible how Gillard created legislation and got it through in a week to get the men brought before the courts.

Existing legislation was used. No new legislation was created.

I’m not sure what you are referring to.

Deref said :

Australia’s finest.

These guys are to the officers of the ADF what first year law students are to judges.

caf said :

Please point out exactly what legislation you are referring to. It is my understanding that they were charged under existing ACT statutes.

I will not point out exactly which legislation I am referring to, however I will refer you to the charge of “using a carriage service in a way which was offensive” which was I believe enacted through commonwealth legislation.

(http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/adfa-skype-scandal-cadets-sentenced-avoid-jail-20131023-2w0hz.html#ixzz2iWaMqtdX)

I would expect the decision on McDonald’s future with the ADF was made long ago. Now the court case is over, it can be announced and carried out.

Just glad I know their names what these scum bags look like. This mud is going to stick for a long time.

Im suprised one of them even considered sleeping with a woman, considering he prefers to receive gobbies from new footy team members.

steveu said :

These fellas learnt a painful lesson. Incredible how Gillard created legislation and got it through in a week to get the men brought before the courts.

Please point out exactly what legislation you are referring to. It is my understanding that they were charged under existing ACT statutes.

Australia’s finest.

The point I have made is that these fellas have learnt their lesson, and been punished.

But do not forget that ‘fraternisation’ is as pointed out by Thumper, is grounds for disciplinary action. She did get into an ‘arrangement’ with one of the guys. These men did the wrong thing. But so did she.

thebrownstreak691:33 pm 23 Oct 13

Proboscus said :

steveu said :

These fellas learnt a painful lesson. Incredible how Gillard created legislation and got it through in a week to get the men brought before the courts. God help them if it was rape. Which it wasn’t. It does appear to be fraternisation as well which I’m pretty sure is frowned upon at ADFA. I would presume the victim in this case would be brought to account for her part in the act. Not that she would ever be named as it may harm her reputation.

You’re right – the lesson these grubs learned was that you can treat women like dirt and get away with it.

Fraternisation is severely frowned upon and is grounds for disciplinary action.

Forget the disciplinary action – didn’t the victim of this incident get bullied out of the ADF?

I understand the victim was already in the poo for another incident of fraternising, and probably left after realising that a good career would be difficult with these things on her record.

It’s a real shame. There’s no upside for the people involved in these situations, one can only hope the standard has been raised a bit for others.

steveu said :

These fellas learnt a painful lesson. Incredible how Gillard created legislation and got it through in a week to get the men brought before the courts. God help them if it was rape. Which it wasn’t. It does appear to be fraternisation as well which I’m pretty sure is frowned upon at ADFA. I would presume the victim in this case would be brought to account for her part in the act. Not that she would ever be named as it may harm her reputation.

You’re right – the lesson these grubs learned was that you can treat women like dirt and get away with it.

Fraternisation is severely frowned upon and is grounds for disciplinary action.

Forget the disciplinary action – didn’t the victim of this incident get bullied out of the ADF?

These fellas learnt a painful lesson. Incredible how Gillard created legislation and got it through in a week to get the men brought before the courts. God help them if it was rape. Which it wasn’t. It does appear to be fraternisation as well which I’m pretty sure is frowned upon at ADFA. I would presume the victim in this case would be brought to account for her part in the act. Not that she would ever be named as it may harm her reputation.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.