Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Avani Terraces - Greenway
Life is looking up

Police guarding airport owners’ profits?

By Sideshowmatt123 - 31 January 2011 24

I noticed at the airport recently that two bicycle-mounted Australian Federal Police officers are stationed for long periods of time on the footpath, some distance along from the arrivals exit. They appear to be occupied in preventing cars from pulling in to pick up arriving passengers.

My question is whether it is appropriate for taxpayer-funded police officers (any estimates of the per diem cost of this dubious public service, including on-costs?) to be deployed in this fashion, forcing people to pay to park?

It seems like overkill, and a function that, insofar as it is necessary*, should be paid for by the airport owners, who collect the resulting carpark revenue. Surely a pair of private security guards would be sufficient to keep the traffic moving?

* a friend recounted that he drove to the footpath to collect his partner, who was dying of cancer and hardly able to breathe standing up. Despite my friend explaining his partner’s condition, the officer on duty moved him on with the threat of a fine.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
24 Responses to
Police guarding airport owners’ profits?
p1 9:32 am 01 Feb 11

deye said :

bigfeet said :

The Canberra rules have nothing to do with security and everything to do with money.

Or it could be that they just haven’t finished building everything yet and that when they do you will be able to drop off and pick up.

Maybe, but that assumes they will one day stop building more…

deye 9:18 am 01 Feb 11

bigfeet said :

The Canberra rules have nothing to do with security and everything to do with money.

Or it could be that they just haven’t finished building everything yet and that when they do you will be able to drop off and pick up.

toriness 8:25 am 01 Feb 11

p1 said :

Ahhh, it’s for security? I hope no one ever comes up with the idea of just blowing up themselves and the car while driving past….

i swear i submitted a constructive, thoughtful – maybe not positive – comment yesterday which didn’t appear. hoping it was my computer/internet connection rather than being moderated.

the security argument doesn’t wash with me when drop off is allowed at canberra airport (unless that has changed now?!), but not pick up. both involve a car stopping for less than a minute and person/luggage being loaded or unloaded. how is it a security risk to pick someone off, but dropping off is ok?

Special G 8:20 am 01 Feb 11

You should write a letter to Mr Snow about that. Tell us how it goes.

karmacarrier 7:01 am 01 Feb 11

Muttsybignuts said :

karmacarrier said :

I think that the underlying reason is one of security.
But it’s curious that they only seem to be there during daylight hours Monday to Friday.
Maybe terrorists don’t get overtime penalty rates.

No, they are there while ever planes are flying in and out. Just like they are at Parliament house, the Lodge, Foreign Affairs and any other place deemed protection worthy.

None in sight at 6.30 this morning.
Terminal full of departing passengers.
But no arrivals yet – so no-one trying to pick-up and avoid the short term parking impost.
Same security implications.
More curiouser.

bigfeet 6:52 am 01 Feb 11

Pandy said :

Funny thing is:

http://www.melbourneairport.com.au/To-From-the-Airport/Airport-Parking/Passenger-Drop-Off.html

Canberra is “sphecial” maybe?

Brisbane, Sydney, Adelaide, Rockhampton and Perth all have kerbside ‘drop-off’ and ‘pick up’ areas in front of the terminal. They are then only Aussie airports I have been to recently so can’t speak about the others.

I have also recently been to New Delhi, Mumbai, Madrid and Muscat airports all of which are at much greater risk of terrorism than Snowtown and they also have similar provisions.

The Canberra rules have nothing to do with security and everything to do with money.

Pandy 11:22 pm 31 Jan 11
Deref 7:04 pm 31 Jan 11

Time for the revolution.

The airport is public infrastructure. Time it was nationalised and returned to the public for the public benefit.

buzz819 5:17 pm 31 Jan 11

luther_bendross said :

I agree with OP, this seems a waste of AFP resources when road laws go blatantly disregarded all over town.

One thing you obviously need to be told. It is the AFP that provide security to Airports, but it comes out of the AFP National Budget. It has nothing to do with ACT Policing. A majority of the workers at the Airport are still currently Protective Services, these guys can’t do anything about the road rules, so get that out of your head.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site