Police Wrap – 3 April

johnboy 3 April 2009 4

1. The ongoing disappointment of Acting Superintendent Daryl Neit:

    ACT Policing’s head of Traffic Operations, Acting Superintendent Daryl Neit, has expressed his disappointment and concern over some Canberra motorists failing to heed the warnings about drink-driving.

    His comments came after the release of drink-driving statistics for the first quarter of 2009, which showed that 400 drivers tested positive for alcohol in the ACT.

    This is only a slight improvement over the same three-month period in 2008, in which 424 drivers tested positive.

    A/Supt Neit said the frustration for police was that a small proportion of Canberra’s motorists appeared willing to risk drink-driving in the full knowledge that the decision could result in themselves or others being killed or maimed on the roads.

    “In the ACT, around one in every 40 drivers screened with a roadside breath-test results in a positive test for alcohol,” a/Supt Neit said.

    “That’s simply not acceptable. So the challenge for police and the community is to make drink-driving a repugnant practice; as if the drink-driver was armed and intent on doing harm to others.

    “Only through making drink-driving reviled by everyone in the community are we likely to see a major reduction in road trauma related to drink-driving.”

    A/Supt Neit’s warning comes a week before the busy Easter holiday travel period, when double demerit points will be applied to all speeding and seat belt offences.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
4 Responses to Police Wrap – 3 April
Punter Punter 2:54 pm 03 Apr 09

Ant, I agree, Mr Neit does make a good point when he says it’s not the roads fault. How many cars are able to drive on that road without losing control? I am certain in most collisions, there is some fault attributed to a driver weather it be drink driving, speeding, inattention or otherwise. If it’s a funny voice which gets your attention then I guess it must have worked.

vandam vandam 2:44 pm 03 Apr 09

Positive for prohibited amount ie; 1 in 40 go to court.

And to be honest they do 1 in 40 and that isn’t even trying. If they were to just target pissed drivers, the ratio would be more like 1 in 4.

Ari Ari 10:56 am 03 Apr 09

In the ACT, around one in every 40 drivers screened with a roadside breath-test results in a positive test for alcohol

Positive test for any alcohol, or positive for a prohibited amount?

ant ant 10:38 am 03 Apr 09

Mr Neit is a disappointed man. Actually, he says a lot of worthwhile things, although he has a rather funny voice. The other night on the news, he was commenting on the double fatality in Chisholm, that car crash. He said quite forcefully that the road didn’t do it, it was a good road and it didn’t attack anyone, it was the DRIVER. Nice point.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter


Search across the site