Probing the polls: Seselja’s choice and arming yourself against COVID-19

Genevieve Jacobs 20 July 2021 11
Arm Yourself promotional poster

The Arm Yourself campaign has been criticised for lack of clear messaging. Image: Department of Health.

While the ACT has consistently elected one Liberal senator to the big house on the hill since self-government, the overwhelming majority of voters in our weekly poll are not happy with how Senator Zed Seselja currently represents our interests on territory rights.

Northern Territory Senator Sam McMahon had proposed a private members’ bill that would have allowed the two territories to legislate on voluntary assisted dying. But Senator Seselja indicated he would not support the bill, prompting a storm of commentary from voters who believe he should represent the majority’s wishes.

“I reckon Zed will ask for a referendum on assisted dying saying this is a decision for the people and he will pledge to support the result … then at the last minute, well, you know …,” said Mark Monterossa.

Frank Trapani wrote: “Senator Seselja may have a different stand on euthanasia and he is entitled to his own beliefs. But this is not a one-person decision or even a political or religious beliefs [decision]. This is a democratic vote for the rights of elderly people who want to go to a better place in their own way.”

READ ALSO: Why isn’t the ACT allowed to make our own laws about euthanasia?

We asked, Should Zed Seselja vote according to his own judgement or the will of the ACT voters? A total of 1617 readers voted.

Your options were to vote He’s elected to represent the wishes of the ACT community. This attracted one of the highest votes our polls have ever recorded, 92 per cent of the total or 1,483 votes. Alternatively, you could have voted He’s elected to use his judgement, not make a populist call. This attracted just 8 per cent of the total, or 134 votes.

This week, we’re wondering whether you think the new COVID-19 vaccination advertising is effective.

The Arm Yourself campaign – which urges Australians to “arm yourself”, “your family”, “your friends”, “your workmates”, “your community” – follows concerns from public health experts that the existing community messaging was lacklustre.

The campaign will be released on social media, billboards, television, print and radio, and aims to encourage more people to get vaccinated.

READ ALSO: Is the new COVID-19 ad campaign hitting the mark?

But marketing experts say the campaign may have already missed the mark.

Dr Andrew Hughes from the School of Business and Economics at the ANU says the Arm Yourself campaign fails to address the reality that people are highly motivated about vaccination but confused about what category they fit into, which vaccine to get and where they can access the jab.

“People are crying out for information,” he said. “It’s not that the ads themselves aren’t working. Without clear messaging, the whole campaign is not working.”

This week, we’re asking:

Do you think the government’s COVID-19 information campaign has been effective?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
11 Responses to Probing the polls: Seselja’s choice and arming yourself against COVID-19
TimboinOz TimboinOz 2:08 pm 02 Nov 21

I’m NOT confused about where to get vaccinated. We – in our 70s – were done twice by 02/08/21!

Those 62% folks haven’t tried to type – vaccinations in ACT – into their desktop. So, they are lying about being ‘confused’. The ACT IS one of the smarter connurbations in Australia.

Simon Trommestad Simon Trommestad 2:28 pm 21 Jul 21

The government’s message prompted me to search for a thwarting solution should vaccines ever become mandatory. However, even the Knight who said Ni has injectable buttocks at the end of his battle that ended in a draw, so my overreaction could prove to be an under-reaction.

    Timothy Bailey Timothy Bailey 3:38 pm 11 Aug 21

    I'd vote for mandatory vaccination, with confirmed medical exemptions from 'at least two' GPs, with serious evidence for that patient, readable by any other Dr. Because I see anti vaxing as antisocial, ill-informed / stupid, and selfish. I had a 36 hr period - over 3 days - of 'some' pain in my left leg, within 3 days of the first AZ jab, but it didn't stop me getting the second one, which was a snap. A vaccinated Simon Trommestad would be a good outcome.

    Simon Trommestad Simon Trommestad 4:05 pm 11 Aug 21

    But how will you deal with my wooden body?

Aldith Graves Aldith Graves 12:10 pm 21 Jul 21

The Feds have so badly handled the vaccination policy & advertising like this just rubs salt in wounds when people can’t access vaccines.

Announcing policies & policy changes without having a logistics plan in place & ready for immediate implementation is madness & a feature of this campaign from the start.

Daniel Duncan Daniel Duncan 11:44 pm 20 Jul 21

Go see your Dr and not a FB post for medical advice that is best for you.

Jay Annabel Jay Annabel 10:54 pm 20 Jul 21

Readers are overwhelmingly against the government getting their COVID-19 messages right.

Jesse Peter Jesse Peter 10:26 pm 20 Jul 21

'be afraid of the bug you have 99.9% chance of surviving, wait for the vaccine that doesn't prevent transmission and wears off in 3-4 months, be ready to get locked down hard if we have even ONE case, and no there's no back up plan'

    Heidi Tunks Heidi Tunks 10:49 pm 20 Jul 21

    Jesse Peter so, are you volunteering to get covid for us then

    David Murn David Murn 4:01 am 21 Jul 21

    If you don't want it, that's your choice. If you're prepared to take the risk if you catch it, that's your choice. If you infect your family or friends (some of who may be unable to get vaccinated), that's selfishness.

    Timothy Bailey Timothy Bailey 3:47 pm 11 Aug 21

    Jesse Peter - Please provide science for your claims. I am betting you can't and are making it up.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site