18 May 2021

'Scandalous waste': avalanche of submissions oppose War Memorial expansion

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
Redeveloped AWM

An artist’s impression of the redeveloped Australian War Memorial, showing the new Southern Entrance and Parade Ground. Image: Australian War Memorial.

A disgrace, a scandalous waste of money and vandalism – they are just some of the criticisms of the planned $500 million expansion of the Australian War Memorial in the first published batches of submissions to the National Capital Authority on the so-called early works application being assessed.

The NCA is the last approval hurdle for the project and has received 599 submissions. The Memorial argues that the expansion will allow it to tell the stories of more contemporary military and peacekeeping missions, and has bipartisan political support.

All bar one of the submissions opposed the proposed development, calling out, in particular, the notion that the demolition of Anzac Hall, major excavation and the removal of 65 trees could be considered early works when they are significant aspects of the redevelopment.

“Considering the three projects outlined above in isolation and calling them ‘early works’ appears to be a deliberate attempt to ‘play them down’ to avoid unwelcome public scrutiny and criticism,” one submission says.

“It is clear that by requesting approval for ‘early works’ … War Memorial management is attempting to place the project in a circumstance of ‘fait accompli’.”

READ ALSO Mice march on amid pleas for support from rural advocacy groups

Many submissions lament the destruction of Anzac Hall, with one saying the “early works amount to nothing short of vandalism” and others calling it unwarranted and unnecessary.

The proposed loss of mature eucalypts around the War Memorial also rates highly, with many saying it contravenes the NCA’s own Tree Management Policy.

One submission argues that the proposal is a test for the NCA, which must assess the heritage impacts of the proposal within the context of the National Capital Plan.

“If the NCA is to remain relevant in the management of the Canberra National Area, they must not see their role as necessarily acquiescent to DAWE [the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment] (or the PWC [the Public Works Committee]). The NCA must be in spirit, what they are in name, an [independent] authority; and make a separate, independent judgement on the heritage impact of this redevelopment proposal,” it says.

Many submissions are concerned at the direction the Memorial is taking towards becoming a museum or even a theme park with the creation of space for large bits of military hardware.

“The national capital should have a memorial to our war dead and their families, NOT a theme park or even a museum,” says one.

“A memorial should be a place of quiet reflection and dignity. These sentiments can be completely lost in a large-scale extravaganza.”

Some see the expanded Memorial becoming a glorification of war rather than a place to reflect on the nation’s losses and the horror of war.

“This project is a disgrace, transforming a peaceful space of grass and trees intended for reflection on the folly and human cost of war into a concrete wasteland celebrating killing and weaponry,” one says.

Many are appalled at the cost, calling for the $500 million to go to veterans’ health or other cultural institutions.

READ ALSO Missing your dogs while you’re at work? You might not be the only one

One suggests a series of infrastructure projects across the nation in memory of those lost in war: “In the small town in western New South Wales where I was born, they have a high school called ‘Hay War Memorial High School’ which serves to honour the memory of all those men from around Hay who went off to war and never came back …

“Rather than investing in this obscenely expensive expansion of the War Memorial, may I suggest that the money available be invested in better public schools, hospitals, libraries, perhaps dental clinics, each with a board recording the names of fellow citizens who died in war, or indeed the names of all those people, men or women, who left their communities to go off to serve.”

A consultation report addressing the matters raised in the submissions will be released to the public, but it is not expected that this will be finalised before the end of June.

Through the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act process, the Parliamentary Works Committee and the Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment have already given the redevelopment a tick.

To read the submissions, visit the NCA website.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
old canberran4:49 pm 20 May 21

Canberra is the object of much criticism by residents of the states for the amount of taxpayer money that is spent on Canberra. To spend $500 million on something in Canberra at this time when businesses and people need financial help is extremely poor timing and totally unjustifiable. I would not have thought after the heavy spending over the past 12 months that there would be any spare cash left for this project.

Capital Retro8:46 am 20 May 21

“A theme park in a cemetery now there’s an idea.”

It will compliment the already existing “theme park in a tree plantation” down the road.

As one whose family members who were most affected by their wartime experiences (from Gallipoli on) were the ones who eschewed any big-noting or fanfare in favour of quiet reflection, must admit the artist’s impression above is somewhat more encouraging than I’d feared, but would hope the bunkers to either side of the Hall of Memory include significantly enhanced research facilities, and would probably break up the expanse of parade ground (with a water feature perhaps) and ‘soften’ or get rid of the vertical columns, to avoid any hint of a Nuremberg feeling.

Diana Mary Napier10:43 am 21 May 21

The plans include a ferris wheel

“ A memorial should be a place of quiet reflection and dignity”, I can’t agree more, but I’ve been there when school excursions have descended and caused havoc. Visiting school kids should be easily identified as part of their school to ensure their behaviour aligns with the school’s ‘usual’ creeds and the respect that the Memorial deserves.

The activists have been busy. Many of the submissions have parroted the same rhetoric, indicating a centrally organised campaign. One of the submissions in batch (17 May 2021) says “I was shocked to learn of the proposed developments from a Greens newsletter”, pointing to the Greens as the origin of this negative campaign. One of the submissions in batch (13 May 2021) even includes the Greens email requesting submissions and suggesting what to say. The hypocrisy is glaring, as the Greens couldn’t wait to remove over 900 trees along Northbourne for the tram, but are now horrified to remove 60 trees to expand the Memorial.

Yes, its pretty much stamdard behaviour for these types of campaigns, through making multiple submissions of almost the same content, it makes it look like there is wide scale opposition and the media often doesn’t delve deeper than the overall numbers before developing their narrative.

Not sure what “type” of campaign you are suggesting as you didn’t make that clear – is it the “type” that objects to turning a memorial to remember the war dead into an armaments theme park? That type? As far as multiple submissions goes, there isn’t a point to be made here. Anyone has the right to put in a submission and if they happen to agree with words that someone else has drafted – well that’s their democratic right to do so.

I’ve literally explained what type of campaign i’m describing. A political one designed to make the opposition to the proposal look wider than it is. In this case by coordinating multiple submissions of the same content through a concerted drive.

But unfortunately for you, the proposal is compliant with the NCP and the government took it to the last election as part of their platform and were elected.

But you know, it’s like Paul Keating said “the dogs may bark, but the caravan rolls on”.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.