The Canberra Times may have already decided the winner of the election, but the specific makeup of the Assembly remains a mystery.
So who are all these people who will be crowding your ballot and which are worthy of your prized “1” in the box by their name?
Fortunately at the expense of staggering quantities time and money RiotACT has compiled a list of worthy candidates.
These are the candidates who back their creativity, can express a vision in both verbal and non-verbal forms, manage time, resources, priorities, and not insignificant amounts of exhaustion.
It was open to all, these are the candidates who answered the call. I personally would vote for any of them over the candidates who weren’t up to it.
And so, in alphabetical order (Electorate, then first name) we present:
Brindabella
Andrew Wall, Liberal
—
Johnathan Davis, Green
—
Karl Maftoum, Labor
—
Mark Gibbons, Pirate
Ginninderra
Glen Takkenberg, Pirate
—
James Higgins, Green
—
Matthew Watts, Liberal
—
Yvette Berry, Labor
Molonglo
Alan Kerlin, Green
—
Mark Kulasingham, Labor
—
Meegan Fitzharris, Labor
—
Shane Rattenbury, Green
—
Stuart Biggs, Pirate
Special thanks to the candidates who donated Lego but were unable to make the build. Rebecca Cody and Tom Sefton
Loading ...
I’d love to see an assembly full of independents, collectively voting for the best outcomes for act residents, rather than the political point scoring nonsense that goes on these days.
As it happens glen, you have my vote and I wish you great success, the discourse is most encouraging.
While it may only be a token gesture, I felt enormous satisfaction in putting Pocock last.
Pirate Party FTW! Well, they may not win, but they seem to be the only sensible party and we need some independent blood in the Assembly to ensure things actually get done. All this not crossing the floor to vote a good idea with the Government or Opposition drives me crazy. Go Pirates!
P.S. I miss the Democrats.
screaming banshee said :
Have a read of this to get an idea why more CCTV isn’t really a good idea for fighting crime http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/cameras-eye-on-the-streets-is-little-more-than-pie-in-the-sky-20121004-2725n.html
Tracking every car movement to help solve one or two cases a year doesn’t seem like a good enough trade for me.
Even then, will it just create an increase in numberplate tampering and/or car theft in order to avoid tracking by the most serious criminals?
The difference between mass surveillance and a find my iPad app is end user control. The end user chooses to install it and enable it, and can disable it at will.
Collecting the data, whatever the safeguards, creates an opportunity for it to be misused.
You may not see the concern, because “why would anyone ever bother tracking me if I’m not doing anything wrong”?
I’ve met a number of activists now who are likely being monitored. They have haven’t done anything wrong either, yet the privacy of themselves and those around them has been compromised.
I don’t want to live in a world where everyone is tracked and monitored like a criminal.
Glen Takkenberg
Pirate Party ACT for Ginninderra
Kdowgg said :
*any* cause…
Glen, would you have an issue with a commercial property operating outward facing security cameras recording footage of people walking past said property. I am aware of a rather significant crime in which one such recording proved very useful evidence to the prosecution.
There have been quite a few incidents reported recently where access to records of cars that have travelled through an area could have proved very useful.
Skip forward to a future where cars drive themselves, communicating with a traffic management system and the cars around it resulting in much more efficient and safer vehicle flow. I am certain such a system will incorporate the recording of vehicle movements, if nothing else than to maintain a record of the management systems compliance with set standards.
While I can see the potential downside, I feel the potential benefits of such data retention can outweigh the downside. Like the tech reporter that had his data wiped using find my whatever due to social engineering, there is far greater benefit to the software as seen recently locally when a citizen found his stolen iPad.
screaming banshee said :
Point to point could stay as long as it’s effectiveness in road safety aims is proven, and we put into place assurances that the data collected is discarded as long as you aren’t detected speeding.
I emailed Simon Corbell about the cameras shortly after they were announced, and the response from him was basically: we promise to not do anything our report[1][2] told us we could theoretically do with it in the future.
Pirate Party ACT and it’s parent, Pirate Party Australia, completely opposes unwarranted mass surveillance [3].
Glen Takkenberg
Pirate Party ACT for Ginninderra
1. http://www.tams.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/204505/ACT_Forward_Design_Study.pdf
2. http://the-riotact.com/here-come-the-point-to-point-cameras/28233
3. http://pirateparty.org.au/wiki/Platform#Privacy_Rights
Masquara said :
Mmm, strangely, I think I prefer Masquara political to funny… (-:
Though there is still a slight political tinge to that line, a little like a smear of sauce on a very stale bun. I think it’s a variation of the sauce used in the traditional Japanese chicken dish called yakitori. Let’s call it yuckytory…
Now *that* was satisfyingly obscure.
Dammit taco, you had me right up until you said you want to take out point to point.
thebadtouch said :
I’m not sure what my Sydney-based mum would think of having been outed as a promoter of Canberra bands…
http://the-riotact.com/benefit-a-music-spectacular-held-jointly-at-the-pot-belly-and-the-basement/82752
poetix said :
Perhaps the post was referring to a dearth of good burghers in the People’s Republic of O’Connor?
astrojax said :
He’s not as funny as Kevin Philips BONG.
johnboy said :
or maybe no votes – he might stuff up his paper and it be counted as illegitimate – wouldn’t that be funny! 🙂
johnboy said :
Well he’s already got one guaranteed vote ….Mr.G!
DrKoresh said :
I’m sure I have witnessed the consumption of burgers at Duxton. I can’t vouch for their quality though, being a feeble muncher of soy-bean products. Their beetroot salad is nice.
PBO said :
Yep all rioters should vote for Poocock,even if he’s in another electorate!
Anyone voting for Pocock is robbing me of the satisfaction of seeing him get one solitary vote.
Do you really want to rob me of that satisfaction?
Bugger it, I will vote for Pocock just to see what happens.
poetix said :
No burgers in O’Connor these days, not good ones at least :'(
Kdowgg said :
Nice post Matt’s mum.
Kdowgg said :
Obvious sycophancy aside, I think Matt Watts was quite brave to submit himself to a grilling from Rioters. Both dorothy dixers and hairy ones were generally handled with honesty and not always towing the party line.
So given that there seems to be few others in Gininderra that are willing to do anything more than harass me at the Jamison shops, my preferences will be distributed amongst those who took the time to put themselves out there, building lego and answering random questions on RA.